In physics, Carroll's paradox arises when considering the motion of a falling rigid rod that is specially constrained. Considered one way, the angular momentum stays constant; considered in a different way, it changes. It is named after Michael M. Carroll who first published it in 1984.

Explanation

Consider two concentric circles of radius $r_1$ and $r_2$ as might be drawn on the face of a wall clock. Suppose a uniform rigid heavy rod of length $l=|r_2-r_1|$ is somehow constrained between these two circles such that one end of the rod remains on the inner circle and the other remains on the outer circle. Motion of the rod along these circles, acting as guides, is frictionless. The rod is held in the three o'clock position so that it is horizontal, then released.

Now consider the angular momentum:

# After release, the rod falls. Being constrained, it must rotate as it moves. When it gets to a vertical six o'clock position, it has lost potential energy and, because the motion is frictionless, will have gained kinetic energy. It therefore possesses angular momentum.
# The reaction force on the rod from either circular guide is frictionless, so it must be directed along the rod; there can be no component of the reaction force perpendicular to the rod. Taking moments about the center of the rod, there can be no moment acting on the rod, so its angular momentum remains constant. Because the rod starts with zero angular momentum, it must continue to have zero angular momentum for all time.

An apparent resolution of this paradox is that the physical situation cannot occur. To maintain the rod in a radial position the circles have to exert an infinite force. In real life it would not be possible to construct guides that do not exert a significant reaction force perpendicular to the rod.

ee also

References

* Victor Namias. "On an apparent paradox in the motion of a smoothly constrained rod", American Journal of Physics, 54(5), May 1986.
* M. M. Carroll. "Singular constraints in rigid-body dynamics", American Journal of Physics, 52(11), Nov 1984, pp 1010-1012.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

### Look at other dictionaries:

• Lewis Carroll — Charles Lutwidge Dodgson Born 27 January 1832(1832 01 27) Daresbury, Halton, Cheshire, England Died …   Wikipedia

• Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel — is a mathematical paradox about infinite sets presented by German mathematician David Hilbert (1862–1943). The Paradox of the Grand Hotel Consider a hypothetical hotel with infinitely many rooms, all of which are occupied that is to say every… …   Wikipedia

• Condorcet-Paradox — Das Condorcet Paradoxon (auch „Problem der zyklischen Mehrheiten“, „Arrow s Paradox“ oder „paradox of voting“ genannt) ist ein nach Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat, Marquis de Condorcet benanntes Paradoxon bei Wahlverfahren, das sich vor allem …   Deutsch Wikipedia

• Boy or Girl paradox — The Boy or Girl problem is a well known example in probability theory: * A random two child family whose older child is a boy is chosen. What is the probability that the younger child is a girl? * A random two child family with at least one boy… …   Wikipedia

• What the Tortoise Said to Achilles — is a brief dialogue by Lewis Carroll which playfully problematises the foundations of logic. The title alludes to one of Zeno s paradoxes of motion, in which Achilles could never overtake the tortoise in a race. In Carroll s dialogue, the… …   Wikipedia

• List of paradoxes — This is a list of paradoxes, grouped thematically. Note that many of the listed paradoxes have a clear resolution see Quine s Classification of Paradoxes.Logical, non mathematical* Paradox of entailment: Inconsistent premises always make an… …   Wikipedia

• Список парадоксов — …   Википедия

• Black hole — For other uses, see Black hole (disambiguation). Simulated view of a black hole (center) in front of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Note the gravitat …   Wikipedia