Helsinki Headline Goal

The Helsinki Headline Goal was a military capability target set for 2003 during the December 1999 Helsinki European Council meeting.Gustav LINDSTROM, "The Headline Goal", April 2006, [] ] There was much interest in the idea of a single EU military force, and inaccurate characterisations of the initiative (which were not much more than some headquarters arrangements and a list of theoretically available national forces) led to inaccurate journalistic ideas about the 'European Rapid Reaction Force', to give one example. [ [,6512,400394,00.html Derek Brown, The Guardian, 11 April 2001, "The European Rapid Reaction Force"] and Philip Butterworth-Hayes, [ Aerospace America February 2001, "The Rapid Reaction Force: What does it bode?"] ] Following the initial declaration in December 1999, the formal agreement on the Headline Goal was reached on November 22, 2004 and according to statements made by EU officials the first units will be deployable in 2007. 60,000 soldiers have been available since January, 1st of 2007 which are deployable for at least a year.

In 2004, a new target was set: the "Headline Goal 2010".


The Headline Goal was built upon an earlier bilateral Franco-British Joint Declaration adopted at St. Malo in December 1998.Colin Robinson, [ "The European Union's "Headline Goal" - Current Status"] , Center for Defense Information, May 23, 2002 ] The St. Malo Declaration said that the European Union ought to have the capability for “autonomous action backed up by credible military forces” as part of a common defence policy. The St. Malo Declaration laid the political foundation between France and the Great Britain, which in turn facilitated the launch of the European Security and Defence Policy and the formulation of the Headline Goal.

Headline Goal 2003

Under this plan, the European Union pledged itself during the Helsinki summit to be able to deploy rapidly and then sustain forces capable of the full range of Petersberg tasks (as set out in the Amsterdam Treaty), including the most demanding, in operations up to corps level (up to 15 brigades or 50,000-60,000 persons) in order to be capable of intervening in any crisis that could occur in an area where European interests are affected. [WEU, "European strategic lift capabilities - reply to the annual report of the Council", 5 December 2001, [] ] The aim was to make those forces self-reliant, deployable within 60 days and over 4,000 km, and sustainable in the field for a year. This means the force would actually have to number around 180,000 troops so as to provide rotating replacements for the initial forces. The Petersberg tasks include humanitarian and rescue tasks; peacekeeping tasks; and tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peacemaking. [EUROPEAN UNION, "Petersberg tasks", n.d., [] ] EU-led forces assembled in response to a crisis would last only for the duration of the crisis and it would be up to the member states themselves to decide whether, when and how to contribute troops.

The Petersberg tasks, which outline the duties of the ERRF, have been expanded from humanitarian, rescue, and peacekeeping and peacemaking to include 'joint disarmament operation', 'military advice and assistance tasks' and 'post-conflict stabilisation'. It also states that, "all these tasks may contribute to the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories." [ [ EUISS: redirection from old site ] ]

Headline Force Catalogue

From the Petersberg task scenarios envisaged, the EU Military Staff generated the "Helsinki Headline Catalogue" which specifies which capabilities are required in each of 144 capability areas. In November 2000, the European Union held a Capabilities Commitment Conference in Brussels, which elicited commitments for over 100,000 (existing) troops that were declared available for what became known as the Helsinki Force Catalogue. A year later, a Capabilities Improvement Conference was held during which further military forces and 5,000 police were added to the catalogue.

European Capability Action Plan

During the December 2001 Laeken summit, the EU launched the European Capabilities Action Plan (ECAP) in order to remedy European capability shortfalls. [WEU, "ESDP developments and the Headline Goal 2010 − reply to the annual report of the Council", 15 June 2005, [] ] It involved initially some 20 panels composed of military experts from the member states which put forward plans and proposals in order to fill the identified shortfalls (e.g. by acquiring new equipment or optimising existing capabilities, in particular through cooperation at European level).

Headline Goal 2010

As the Helsinki Headline Goal became fulfilled, the European Council of June 2004 approved to further develop the EU’s military crisis management capability and a new target was set: the "Headline Goal 2010". [FINNISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, "HEADLINE GOAL 2010", n.d., [] ] EU members made the commitment that by the year 2010, at the latest, they would be capable of responding "with swift and decisive action applying a fully coherent approach" to the whole spectrum of crisis management operations covered by the Treaty of the EU and the 2003 EU Security Strategy (i.e. humanitarian and rescue tasks, disarmament operations, support to third countries in combating terrorism, peacekeeping tasks and tasks of combat forces in crisis management, and peacemaking). The EU also aims to address the shortfalls from the previous headline goal (e.g. gaps related to strategic airlift and sealift) which are still considered to be a limiting factor to the operability of the designated forces, especially in more demanding crisis management operations.

ee also

*European Gendarmerie Force
*European Union rapid reaction mechanism
*European Security and Defence Policy
*Berlin Plus agreement


External links

*EU Council Secretariat, [ Background- Development of European Military Capabilities: The Force Catalogue 2006] , November 2006
*European Commission, [ "ESDP: Commission proposes Rapid Reaction Facility to mobilise civilian crisis instruments", 11 April 2000]
* [ Foreign Policy Research Center report]

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Common Security and Defence Policy — European Union This article is part of the series: Politics and government of the European Union …   Wikipedia

  • European Security and Defence Policy — The European Security and Defence Policy or ESDP is a major element of the Common Foreign and Security Policy pillar of the European Union (EU). The ESDP is the successor of the European Security and Defence Identity under NATO, but differs in… …   Wikipedia

  • Common Foreign and Security Policy — This article deals with the workings of European Union foreign policy. For the relations between the European Union and third countries, see Foreign relations of the European Union. European Union This a …   Wikipedia

  • Military of the European Union — The coat of arms of the EU military staff Service branches EUMS …   Wikipedia

  • European Union battlegroups — (EU BGs) are military forces under the direct control of the European Council, each consisting of at least 1500 combat soldiers. Fifteen battlegroups have been established, most of which consist of multi national countributions. The groups rotate …   Wikipedia

  • Switzerland–European Union relations — Euro Swiss relations European Union …   Wikipedia

  • European integration — European Union This article is part of the series: Politics and government of the European Union …   Wikipedia

  • Eurofor — Active 1995 Country …   Wikipedia

  • Visa policy in the European Union — A specimen Schengen visa. A Schengen visa entitles the holders to travel throughout the 25 member Schengen Area All European Union member states, with the exception of Ireland and the United Kingdom, have a unified visa system as part of the… …   Wikipedia

  • Rapid reaction force — A rapid reaction force is a military or police unit designed to respond in very short time frames to emergencies. When used in reference to police forces such as SWAT teams, the time frame is minutes, while in military applications, such as with… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.