Type II supernova

The expanding remnant of SN 1987A, a Type II-P supernova in the Large Magellanic Cloud. NASA image.

A Type II supernova (plural: supernovae) results from the rapid collapse and violent explosion of a massive star. A star must have at least 9 times, and no more than 40–50 times the mass of the Sun for this type of explosion.[1] It is distinguished from other types of supernova by the presence of hydrogen in its spectrum. Type II supernovae are mainly observed in the spiral arms of galaxies and in H II regions, but not in elliptical galaxies.[2]

Massive stars generate energy by the nuclear fusion of elements. Unlike the Sun, these stars possess the mass needed to fuse elements that have an atomic mass greater than hydrogen and helium, albeit at increasingly high temperatures and pressure, and for increasingly shorter periods of time. The degeneracy pressure of electrons and the energy generated by these fusion reactions is sufficient to counter the force of gravity and prevent the star from collapsing. The star fuses increasingly higher mass elements, starting with hydrogen and then helium, until finally a core of iron and nickel is produced. Fusion of iron or nickel produces no net energy, so further fusion is unable to take place, leaving the nickel-iron core inert.

When the mass of the inert core exceeds the Chandrasekhar limit of about 1.44 solar masses, electron degeneracy alone is no longer sufficient to counter gravity. A cataclysmic implosion takes place within seconds, in which the outer core reaches an inward velocity of up to 23% of the speed of light and the inner core reaches temperatures of up to 100 billion kelvin. Neutrons and neutrinos are formed via reversed beta-decay, releasing about 1046 joules (100 foes) in a ten-second burst. The collapse is halted by neutron degeneracy, causing the implosion to bounce outward. The energy of this expanding shock wave is sufficient to detach the surrounding stellar material, forming a supernova explosion, while the shock wave and extreme conditions briefly allows the production of elements heavier than iron.[3] Because of the underlying mechanism, the resulting variable star is also described as a core-collapse supernova.

There exist several categories of Type II supernova explosions, which are categorized based on the resulting light curve—a graph of luminosity versus time—following the explosion. Type II-L supernovae show a steady (linear) decline of the light curve following the explosion, whereas Type II-P display a period of slower decline (a plateau) in their light curve followed by a normal decay. Type Ib and Ic supernovae are a type of core-collapse supernova for a massive star that has shed its outer envelope of hydrogen and (for Type Ic) helium. As a result they appear to be lacking in these elements.

Contents

Formation

The onion-like layers of a massive, evolved star just before core collapse. (Not to scale.)

Stars far more massive than the sun evolve in more complex ways. In the core of the sun, hydrogen is fused into helium, releasing thermal energy which heats the sun's core and provides pressure that supports the sun's layers against collapse in a process known as hydrostatic equilibrium. The helium produced in the core accumulates there since temperatures in the core are not yet high enough to cause it to fuse. Eventually, as the hydrogen at the core is exhausted, fusion starts to slow down and gravity causes the core to contract. This contraction raises the temperature high enough to initiate a shorter phase of helium fusion, which accounts for less than 10% of the star's total lifetime. In stars with less than eight solar masses, the carbon produced by helium fusion does not fuse, and the star gradually cools to become a white dwarf.[4][5] White dwarf stars, if they have a near companion, may then become Type Ia supernovae.

A much larger star, however, is massive enough to create temperatures and pressures needed to cause the carbon in the core to begin to fuse once the star contracts at the end of the helium-burning stage. The cores of these massive stars become layered like onions as progressively heavier atomic nuclei build up at the center, with an outermost layer of hydrogen gas, surrounding a layer of hydrogen fusing into helium, surrounding a layer of helium fusing into carbon via the triple-alpha process, surrounding layers that fuse to progressively heavier elements. As a star this massive evolves, it undergoes repeated stages where fusion in the core stops, and the core collapses until the pressure and temperature is sufficient to begin the next stage of fusion, reigniting to halt collapse.[4][5]

Core-burning nuclear fusion stages for a 25-solar mass star
Process Main fuel Main products 25 M star[6]
Temperature
(Kelvin)
Density
(g/cm3)
Duration
hydrogen burning hydrogen helium 7×107 10 107 years
triple-alpha process helium carbon, oxygen 2×108 2000 106 years
carbon burning process carbon Ne, Na, Mg, Al 8×108 106 103 years
neon burning process neon O, Mg 1.6×109 107 3 years
oxygen burning process oxygen Si, S, Ar, Ca 1.8×109 107 0.3 years
silicon burning process silicon nickel (decays into iron) 2.5×109 108 5 days

Core collapse

The factor limiting this process is the amount of energy that is released through fusion, which is dependent on the binding energy that holds together these atomic nuclei. Each additional step produces progressively heavier nuclei, which release progressively less energy when fusing. In addition from carbon-burning onwards energy loss via neutrino production becomes significant, leading to a higher rate of reaction than would otherwise take place.[7] This continues until nickel-56 is produced, which decays radioactively into cobalt-56 and then iron-56 over the course of a few months. As iron and nickel have the highest binding energy per nucleon of all the elements,[8] energy cannot be produced at the core by fusion, and a nickel-iron core grows.[5][9] This core is under huge gravitational pressure. As there is no fusion to further raise the star's temperature to support it against collapse, it is supported only by degeneracy pressure of electrons. In this state, matter is so dense that further compaction would require electrons to occupy the same energy states. However, this is forbidden for identical fermion particles, such as the electron—a phenomenon called the Pauli exclusion principle.

When the core's mass exceeds the Chandrasekhar limit, degeneracy pressure can no longer support it, and catastrophic collapse ensues.[10] The outer part of the core reaches velocities of up to 70,000 km/s (23% of the speed of light) as it collapses toward the center of the star.[11] The rapidly shrinking core heats up, producing high-energy gamma rays that decompose iron nuclei into helium nuclei and free neutrons via photodisintegration. As the core's density increases, it becomes energetically favorable for electrons and protons to merge via inverse beta decay, producing neutrons and elementary particles called neutrinos. Because neutrinos rarely interact with normal matter they can escape from the core, carrying away energy and further accelerating the collapse, which proceeds over a timescale of milliseconds. As the core detaches from the outer layers of the star, some of these neutrinos are absorbed by the star's outer layers, beginning the supernova explosion.[12]

For Type II supernovae, the collapse is eventually halted by short-range repulsive neutron-neutron interactions, mediated by the strong force, as well as by degeneracy pressure of neutrons, at a density comparable to that of an atomic nucleus. Once collapse stops, the infalling matter rebounds, producing a shock wave that propagates outward. The energy from this shock dissociates heavy elements within the core. This reduces the energy of the shock, which can stall the explosion within the outer core.[13]

The core collapse phase is so dense and energetic that only neutrinos are able to escape. As the protons and electrons combine to form neutrons by means of electron capture, an electron neutrino is produced. In a typical Type II supernova, the newly formed neutron core has an initial temperature of about 100 billion kelvin; 105 times the temperature of the sun's core. Much of this thermal energy must be shed for a stable neutron star to form; otherwise the neutrons would "boil away". This is accomplished by a further release of neutrinos.[14] These 'thermal' neutrinos form as neutrino-antineutrino pairs of all flavors, and total several times the number of electron-capture neutrinos.[15] The two neutrino production mechanisms convert the gravitational potential energy of the collapse into a ten second neutrino burst, releasing about 1046 joules (100 foes).[16]

Through a process that is not clearly understood, about 1044 joules (1 foe) is reabsorbed by the stalled shock, producing an explosion.[a][13] The neutrinos generated by a supernova were actually observed in the case of Supernova 1987A, leading astronomers to conclude that the core collapse picture is basically correct. The water-based Kamiokande II and IMB instruments detected antineutrinos of thermal origin,[14] while the gallium-71-based Baksan instrument detected neutrinos (lepton number = 1) of either thermal or electron-capture origin.

Within a massive, evolved star (a) the onion-layered shells of elements undergo fusion, forming a nickel-iron core (b) that reaches Chandrasekhar-mass and starts to collapse. The inner part of the core is compressed into neutrons (c), causing infalling material to bounce (d) and form an outward-propagating shock front (red). The shock starts to stall (e), but it is re-invigorated by neutrino interaction. The surrounding material is blasted away (f), leaving only a degenerate remnant.

When the progenitor star is below about 20 solar masses—depending on the strength of the explosion and the amount of material that falls back—the degenerate remnant of a core collapse is a neutron star.[11] Above this mass the remnant collapses to form a black hole.[5][17] The theoretical limiting mass for this type of core collapse scenario is about 40–50 solar masses. Above that mass, a star is believed to collapse directly into a black hole without forming a supernova explosion,[18] although uncertainties in models of supernova collapse make calculation of these limits uncertain.

Theoretical models

The Standard Model of particle physics is a theory which describes three of the four known fundamental interactions between the elementary particles that make up all matter. This theory allows predictions to be made about how particles will interact under many conditions. The energy per particle in a supernova is typically one to one hundred and fifty picojoules (tens to hundreds of MeV).[19] The per-particle energy involved in a supernova is small enough that the predictions gained from the Standard Model of particle physics are likely to be basically correct. But the high densities may require corrections to the Standard Model.[20] In particular, Earth-based particle accelerators can produce particle interactions which are of much higher energy than are found in supernovae,[21] but these experiments involve individual particles interacting with individual particles, and it is likely that the high densities within the supernova will produce novel effects. The interactions between neutrinos and the other particles in the supernova take place with the weak nuclear force, which is believed to be well understood. However, the interactions between the protons and neutrons involve the strong nuclear force, which is much less well understood.[22]

The major unsolved problem with Type II supernovae is that it is not understood how the burst of neutrinos transfers its energy to the rest of the star producing the shock wave which causes the star to explode. From the above discussion, only one percent of the energy needs to be transferred to produce an explosion, but explaining how that one percent of transfer occurs has proven very difficult, even though the particle interactions involved are believed to be well understood. In the 1990s, one model for doing this involved convective overturn, which suggests that convection, either from neutrinos from below, or infalling matter from above, completes the process of destroying the progenitor star. Heavier elements than iron are formed during this explosion by neutron capture, and from the pressure of the neutrinos pressing into the boundary of the "neutrinosphere", seeding the surrounding space with a cloud of gas and dust which is richer in heavy elements than the material from which the star originally formed.[23]

Neutrino physics, which is modeled by the Standard Model, is crucial to the understanding of this process.[20] The other crucial area of investigation is the hydrodynamics of the plasma that makes up the dying star; how it behaves during the core collapse determines when and how the "shock wave" forms and when and how it "stalls" and is reenergized.[24] Computer models have been very successful at calculating the behavior of Type II supernovae once the shock has been formed. By ignoring the first second of the explosion, and assuming that an explosion is started, astrophysicists have been able to make detailed predictions about the elements produced by the supernova and of the expected light curve from the supernova.[25][26][27]

Light curves

This graph of the luminosity as a function of time shows the characteristic shapes of the light curves for a Type II-L and II-P supernova.

When the spectrum of a Type II supernovae is examined, it normally displays Balmer absorption lines—the characteristic frequencies where hydrogen atoms absorbs energy. The presence of these lines are used to distinguish this category of supernova from a Type Ia supernova.

When the luminosity of a Type II supernova is plotted over a period of time, it shows a characteristic rise to a peak brightness followed by a decline. These light curves have an average decay rate of 0.008 magnitudes per day; much lower than the decay rate for Type Ia supernovae. Type II are sub-divided into two classes, depending on the shape of the light curve. The light curve for a Type II-L supernova shows a steady (linear) decline following the peak brightness. By contrast, the light curve of a Type II-P supernova has a distinctive flat stretch (called a plateau) during the decline; representing a period where the luminosity decays at a slower rate. The net luminosity decay rate is lower, at 0.0075 magnitudes per day for Type II-P, compared to 0.012 magnitudes per day for Type II-L.[28]

The difference in the shape of the light curves is believed to be caused, in the case of Type II-L supernovae, by the expulsion of most of the hydrogen envelope of the progenitor star.[28] The plateau phase in Type II-P supernovae is due to a change in the opacity of the exterior layer. The shock wave ionizes the hydrogen in the outer envelope—stripping the electron from the hydrogen atom—resulting in a significant increase in the opacity. This prevents photons from the inner parts of the explosion from escaping. Once the hydrogen cools sufficiently to recombine, the outer layer becomes transparent.[29]

Type IIn supernovae

The "n" denotes narrow, which indicates the presence of intermediate or very narrow width H emission lines in the spectra. In the intermediate width case, the ejecta from the explosion may be interacting strongly with gas around the star – the circumstellar medium. [30][31] There are indications that they originate as stars similar to Luminous blue variables with large mass losses before exploding.[32] SN 2005gl is one example of Type IIn; SN 2006gy, an extremely energetic supernova, may be another example.[33]

Type IIb supernovae

A Type IIb supernova has a weak hydrogen line in its initial spectrum, which is why it is classified as a Type II. After the initial peak in its light curve there is a second peak that has a spectrum which more closely resembles a Type Ib supernova. The progenitor could have been a giant star which lost most of its hydrogen envelope due to interactions with a companion in a binary system, leaving behind the core that consisted almost entirely of helium.[34] As the ejecta of a Type IIb expands, the hydrogen layer quickly becomes more transparent and reveals the deeper layers.[34] The classic example of a Type IIb supernova is Supernova 1993J,[35][36] while another example is Cassiopeia A.[37]

Hypernovae (collapsars)

The core collapse of sufficiently massive stars may not be halted. Degeneracy pressure and repulsive neutron-neutron interactions can only support a neutron star whose mass does not exceed the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit of very roughly 4 solar masses.[38] Above this limit, the core collapses to directly form a black hole,[18] perhaps producing a (still theoretical) hypernova explosion. In the proposed hypernova mechanism (known as a collapsar) two extremely energetic jets of plasma are emitted from the star's rotational poles at nearly light speed. These jets emit intense gamma rays, and are one of many candidate explanations for gamma ray bursts.[39]

See also


References

  1. ^ Gilmore, Gerry (2004). "The Short Spectacular Life of a Superstar". Science 304 (5697): 1915–1916. doi:10.1126/science.1100370. PMID 15218132. 
  2. ^ Ridge, Oak (2011-03-07). "Solving the Mystery of the Most Violent Event in the Universe: A Core-Collapse Supernovas Explosion". http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2011/03/-magnetic-fields-of-supernovas-beyond-human-comprehension.html. Retrieved 2011-03-09. 
  3. ^ Staff (2006-09-07). "Introduction to Supernova Remnants". NASA Goddard/SAO. http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/objects/snrs/snrstext.html. Retrieved 2007-05-01. 
  4. ^ a b Richmond, Michael. "Late stages of evolution for low-mass stars". Rochester Institute of Technology. http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys230/lectures/planneb/planneb.html. Retrieved 2006-08-04. 
  5. ^ a b c d Hinshaw, Gary (2006-08-23). "The Life and Death of Stars". NASA Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Mission. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101stars.html. Retrieved 2006-09-01. 
  6. ^ Woosley, S.; Janka, H.-T. (2006-01-12). "The Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae". Nature Physics 1 (3): 147–154. arXiv:astro-ph/0601261. Bibcode 2005NatPh...1..147W. doi:10.1038/nphys172. 
  7. ^ Clayton, Donald (1983). Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226109534. http://books.google.com/books?id=8HSGFThnbvkC. 
  8. ^ Fewell, M. P. (1995). "The atomic nuclide with the highest mean binding energy". American Journal of Physics 63 (7): 653–658. Bibcode 1995AmJPh..63..653F. doi:10.1119/1.17828. 
  9. ^ Fleurot, Fabrice. "Evolution of Massive Stars". Laurentian University. http://nu.phys.laurentian.ca/~fleurot/evolution/. Retrieved 2007-08-13. 
  10. ^ Lieb, E. H.; Yau, H.-T. (1987). "A rigorous examination of the Chandrasekhar theory of stellar collapse". Astrophysical Journal 323 (1): 140–144. Bibcode 1987ApJ...323..140L. doi:10.1086/165813. 
  11. ^ a b Fryer, C. L.; New, K. C. B. (2006-01-24). "Gravitational Waves from Gravitational Collapse". Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics. http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-2/. Retrieved 2006-12-14. 
  12. ^ Hayakawa, Takehito, Hayakawa, T.;; Iwamoto, N.; Kajino, T.; Shizuma, T.; Umeda, H.; Nomoto, K. (2006). "Principle of Universality of Gamma-Process Nucleosynthesis in Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions". The Astrophysical Journal 648 (1): L47–L50. Bibcode 2006ApJ...648L..47H. doi:10.1086/507703. 
  13. ^ a b Fryer, C. L.; New, K. B. C. (2006-01-24). "Gravitational Waves from Gravitational Collapse, section 3.1". Los Alamos National Laboratory. http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-2&page=articlesu6.html. Retrieved 2006-12-09. 
  14. ^ a b Mann, Alfred K. (1997). Shadow of a star: The neutrino story of Supernova 1987A. New York: W. H. Freeman. p. 122. ISBN 0716730979. http://www.whfreeman.com/GeneralReaders/book.asp?disc=TRAD&id_product=1058001008&@id_course=1058000240. 
  15. ^ Gribbin, John R.; Gribbin, Mary (2000). Stardust: Supernovae and Life – The Cosmic Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 173. ISBN 9780300090970. http://yalepress.yale.edu/yupbooks/book.asp?isbn=9780300090970. 
  16. ^ Barwick, S.; Beacom, J. et al. (2004-10-29). "APS Neutrino Study: Report of the Neutrino Astrophysics and Cosmology Working Group" (PDF). American Physical Society. http://www.aps.org/policy/reports/multidivisional/neutrino/upload/Neutrino_Astrophysics_and_Cosmology_Working_Group.pdf. Retrieved 2006-12-12. 
  17. ^ Michael, Chris L. (2003). "Black Hole Formation from Stellar Collapse". Classical and Quantum Gravity 20 (10): S73–S80. Bibcode 2003CQGra..20S..73F. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/309. 
  18. ^ a b Fryer, Chris L. (1999). "Mass Limits For Black Hole Formation". The Astrophysical Journal 522 (1): 413–418. arXiv:astro-ph/9902315. Bibcode 1999ApJ...522..413F. doi:10.1086/307647. 
  19. ^ Izzard, R. G.; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Tout, C. A. (2004). "Formation rates of core-collapse supernovae and gamma-ray bursts". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 348 (4): 1215. arXiv:astro-ph/0311463. Bibcode 2004MNRAS.348.1215I. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07436.x. 
  20. ^ a b Rampp, M.; Buras, R.; Janka, H.-Th.; Raffelt, G. (February 11–16, 2002). "Core-collapse supernova simulations: Variations of the input physics". Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on "Nuclear Astrophysics". Ringberg Castle, Tegernsee, Germany. pp. 119–125. Bibcode 2002nuas.conf..119R. 
  21. ^ The OPAL Collaboration; Ackerstaff, K. et al. (1998). "Tests of the Standard Model and Constraints on New Physics from Measurements of Fermion-pair Production at 189 GeV at LEP". [Submitted to] The European Physical Journal C 2 (3): 441–472. doi:10.1007/s100529800851. http://publish.edpsciences.com/articles/epjc/abs/1998/05/epjc851/epjc851.html. Retrieved 2007-03-18. 
  22. ^ Staff (2004-10-05). "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004". Nobel Foundation. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2004/public.html. Retrieved 2007-05-30. 
  23. ^ Stover, Dawn (2006). "Life In A Bubble". Popular Science 269 (6): 16. 
  24. ^ Janka, H.-Th.; Langanke, K.; Marek, A.; Martinez-Pinedo, G.; Mueller, B. (2006). "Theory of Core-Collapse Supernovae". Bethe Centennial Volume of Physics Reports [submitted] 142 (1–4): 229. arXiv:astro-ph/0612072. Bibcode 1993JHyd..142..229H. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(93)90012-X. 
  25. ^ Blinnikov, S.I.; Röpke, F. K.; Sorokina, E. I.; Gieseler, M.; Reinecke, M.; Travaglio, C.; Hillebrandt, W.; Stritzinger, M. (2006). "Theoretical light curves for deflagration models of type Ia supernova". Astronomy and Astrophysics 453 (1): 229–240. arXiv:astro-ph/0603036. Bibcode 2006A&A...453..229B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054594. 
  26. ^ Young, Timothy R. (2004). "A Parameter Study of Type II Supernova Light Curves Using 6 M He Cores". The Astrophysical Journal 617 (2): 1233–1250. arXiv:astro-ph/0409284. Bibcode 2004ApJ...617.1233Y. doi:10.1086/425675. 
  27. ^ Rauscher, T.; Heger, A.; Hoffman, R. D.; Woosley, S. E. (2002). "Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars With Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics". The Astrophysical Journal 576 (1): 323–348. arXiv:astro-ph/0112478. Bibcode 2002ApJ...576..323R. doi:10.1086/341728. 
  28. ^ a b Doggett, J. B.; Branch, D. (1985). "A Comparative Study of Supernova Light Curves". Astronomical Journal 90: 2303–2311. Bibcode 1985AJ.....90.2303D. doi:10.1086/113934. 
  29. ^ "Type II Supernova Light Curves". Swinburne University of Technology. http://cosmos.swin.edu.au/lookup.html?e=typeiisupernovalightcurves. Retrieved 2007-03-17. 
  30. ^ Filippenko, A. V. (1997). "Optical Spectra of Supernovae". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 35: 309–330. Bibcode 1997ARA&A..35..309F. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309.  edit
  31. ^ Pastorello, A.; Turatto, M.; Benetti, S.; Cappellaro, E.; Danziger, I. J.; Mazzali, P. A.; Patat, F.; Filippenko, A. V.; Schlegel, D. J.; Matheson, T. (2002). "The type IIn supernova 1995G: interaction with the circumstellar medium". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 333 (1): 27–38. arXiv:astro-ph/0201483. Bibcode 2002MNRAS.333...27P. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05366.x. 
  32. ^ Michael Kiewe; Avishay Gal-Yam; Iair Arcavi; Leonard; Emilio Enriquez; Bradley Cenko; Fox; Dae-Sik Moon et al. (2010). "Caltech Core-Collapse Project (CCCP) observations of type IIn supernovae: typical properties and implications for their progenitor stars". arXiv:1010.2689 [astro-ph.CO]. 
  33. ^ Smith, N.; Chornock, R.; Silverman, J. M.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J. (2010). "SPECTRAL EVOLUTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY TYPE IIn SUPERNOVA 2006gy". The Astrophysical Journal 709 (2): 856. Bibcode 2010ApJ...709..856S. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/856.  edit
  34. ^ a b Utrobin, V. P. (1996). "Nonthermal ionization and excitation in Type IIb supernova 1993J". Astronomy and Astrophysics 306 (5940): 219–231. Bibcode 1996A&A...306..219U. 
  35. ^ Nomoto, K.; Suzuki, T.; Shigeyama, T.; Kumagai, S.; Yamaoka, H.; Saio, H. (1993). "A type IIb model for supernova 1993J". Nature 364 (6437): 507. Bibcode 1993Natur.364..507N. doi:10.1038/364507a0.  edit
  36. ^ Chevalier, R. A.; Soderberg, A. M. (2010). "TYPE IIb SUPERNOVAE WITH COMPACT AND EXTENDED PROGENITORS". The Astrophysical Journal 711: L40. Bibcode 2010ApJ...711L..40C. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/711/1/L40.  edit
  37. ^ Krause, O.; Birkmann, S.; Usuda, T.; Hattori, T.; Goto, M.; Rieke, G.; Misselt, K. (2008). "The Cassiopeia A supernova was of type IIb". Science 320 (5880): 1195–1197. Bibcode 2008Sci...320.1195K. doi:10.1126/science.1155788. PMID 18511684.  edit
  38. ^ Bombaci, I. (1996). "The maximum mass of a neutron star". Astronomy and Astrophysics 305: 871–877. Bibcode 1996A&A...305..871B. 
  39. ^ "Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts and Hypernovae Conclusively Linked". European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere (ESO). 2003-06-18. http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2003/pr-16-03.html. Retrieved 2006-10-30. 


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Type Ia supernova — A Type Ia supernova is a sub category of cataclysmic variable stars that results from the violent explosion of a white dwarf star. A white dwarf is the remnant of a star that has completed its normal life cycle and has ceased nuclear fusion.… …   Wikipedia

  • Supernova (disambiguation) — Supernova or Super Nova may mean:cience and astronomy* Supernova, an astronomical event, a type of stellar explosionAssociated with this type of event are: * Type Ia supernova * Type Ib and Ic supernovae * Type II supernova * Supernova remnant *… …   Wikipedia

  • Supernova — This article is about the astronomical event. For other uses, see Supernova (disambiguation). Multiwavelength X ray, infrared, and optical compilation image of Kepler s supernova remnant, SN 1604. A supernova is a stellar explosion that is more… …   Wikipedia

  • Supernova — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Supernova (homonymie). La supernova SN 1994D (le point blanc brillant en bas à gauche de l image), dans la partie externe du disque de la galaxie spirale NGC 4526. Une supernov …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Supernova SN 2006gy — SN 2006gy SN2006gy Données d observation (Époque 2000.0) Type de la supernova IIn Type de rémanent Résidu compact Galaxie hôte NGC 1260 Constellation …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Type Ib and Ic supernovae — [ cite web author=Malesani, D. et al | year=2008 url=http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008arXiv0805.1188M title=Early spectroscopic identification of SN 2008D publisher=Cornell University accessdate=2008 05 22 ] [cite web author=Soderberg, A.M. et… …   Wikipedia

  • Supernova de tipo Ia — Una supernova de tipo Ia es una subcategoría de estrellas variables que se producen después de la violenta explosión de una enana blanca. Las enanas blancas son los restos de estrellas que han completado su ciclo normal de vida y han cesado su… …   Wikipedia Español

  • Supernova par production de paires — Une supernova par production de paires est une théorie établie à la fin des années 1960 par Z. Barkat et ses collaborateurs, ainsi que Gary S. Fraley. Elle concernerait les étoiles particulièrement massives, excédant au moins 140 masses solaires …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Supernova Cosmology Project — The Supernova Cosmology Project is one of two research teams that determined the likelihood of an accelerating universe and therefore a positive Cosmological constant. This discovery was named Breakthrough of the Year for 1998 by Science Magazine …   Wikipedia

  • Type 1c — Supernova Pour les articles homonymes, voir Supernova (homonymie). La supernova SN 1994D (le point blanc brillant en bas à gauche de l image), dans la partie externe du disque de la galaxie spi …   Wikipédia en Français


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.