The causal sets programme is an approach to
quantum gravity. Its founding principle is that spacetimeis fundamentally discrete and that the spacetime points are related by a partial order. This partial order has the physical meaning of the causality relations between spacetime points.
The programme is based on a theoremD. Malament, " [http://link.aip.org/link/?JMAPAQ/18/1399/1 The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime] ", Journal of Mathematical Physics, July 1977, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp. 1399-1404] by
David Malamentwhich states that if there is a map between two past and future distinguishingspacetimes which preserves their causal structurethen the map is a conformal isomorphism. The conformal factor that is left undetermined is related to the volume of regions in the spacetime. This volume factor can be recovered by specifying a volume element for each spacetime point. The volume of a spacetime region could then be found by counting the number of points in that region.
Causal sets was initiated by
Rafael Sorkinwho continues to be the main proponent of the programme. He has coined the slogan "Order + Number = Geometry" to characterise the above argument. The programme provides a theory in which spacetime is fundamentally discrete while retaining local Lorentz invariance.
A causal set (or causet) is a set with a partial order relation which is
* Locally finite: cardfor all . Here card() denotes the
cardinalityof a set .
Given a causal set we may ask whether it can be "embedded" into a
Lorentzian manifold. An embedding would be a map taking elements of the causal set into points in the manifold such that the order relation of the causal set matches the causal ordering of the manifold. A further criterion is needed however before the embedding is suitable. If, on average, the number of causal set elements mapped into a region of the manifold is proportional to the volume of the region then the embedding is said to be "faithful". In this case we can consider the causal set to be 'manifold-like'
A central conjecture to the causal set programme is that the same causal set cannot be faithfully embedded into two spacetimes which are not similar on large scales. This is called the "hauptvermutung", meaning 'fundamental conjecture'. It is difficult to define this conjecture precisely because it is difficult to decide when two spacetimes are 'similar on large scales'.
Modelling spacetime as a causal set would require us to restrict attention to those causal sets which are 'manifold-like'. Given a causal set this is a difficult property to determine.
The difficulty of determining whether a causal set can be embedded into a manifold can be approached from the other direction. We can create a causal set by sprinkling points into a Lorentzian manifold. By sprinkling points in proportion to the volume of the spacetime regions and using the causal order relations in the manifold to induce order relations between the sprinkled points, we can produce a causal set which (by construction) can be faithfully embedded into the manifold.
To maintain Lorentz invariance this sprinkling of points must be done randomly using a
Poisson process. Thus the probability of sprinkling points into a region of volume is
where is the density of the sprinkling.
Sprinkling points in on a regular lattice would not keep the number of points proportional to the region volume.
Some geometrical constructions in manifolds carry over to causal sets. When defining these we must remember to rely only on the causal set itself, not on any background spacetime into which it might be embedded. For an overview of these constructions, see G, Brightwell, R. Gregory, " [http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v66/p260 Structure of random discrete spacetime] ", Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 260 - 263 (1991)] .
A "link" in a causal set is a pair of elements such that but with no such that .
A "chain" is a sequence of elements such that for . The length of a chain is , the number of relations used.
We can use this to define a
geodesicbetween two causal set elements. A geodesic between two elements is a chain consisting only of links such that
# The length of the chain, , is maximal over all chains from to .In general there will be more than one geodesic between two elements.
Myrheim J. Myrheim, [http://doc.cern.ch//archive/electronic/kek-scan//197808143.pdf CERN preprint] TH-2538 (1978)] first suggested that the length of such a geodesic should be directly proportional to the proper time along a timelike geodesic joining the two spacetime points. Tests of this conjecture have been made using causal sets generated from sprinklings into flat spacetimes. The proportionality has been shown to hold and is conjectured to hold for sprinklings in curved spacetimes too.
Much work has been done in estimating the manifold
dimensionof a causal set. This involves algorithms using the causal set aiming to give the dimension of the manifold into which it can be faithfully embedded. The algorithms developed so far are based on finding the dimension of a Minkowski spacetimeinto which the causal set can be faithfully embedded.
*Myrheim-Meyer dimensionThis approach relies on estimating the number of -length chains present in a sprinkling into -dimensional Minkowski spacetime. Counting the number of -length chains in the causal set then allows an estimate for to be made.
*Midpoint-scaling dimensionThis approach relies on the relationship between the proper time between two points in Minkowski spacetime and the volume of the spacetime interval between them. By computing the maximal chain length (to estimate the proper time) between two points and and counting the number of elements such that (to estimate the volume of the spacetime interval) the dimension of the spacetime can be calculated.
These estimators should give the correct dimension for causal sets generated by high-density sprinklings into -dimensional Minkowski spacetime. Tests in conformally-flat spacetimesD.D. Reid, "Manifold dimension of a causal set: Tests in conformally flat spacetimes", Phys.Rev. D67 (2003) 024034, ] have shown these two methods to be accurate.
An ongoing task is to develop the correct dynamics for causal sets. These would provide a set of rules that determine which causal sets correspond to physically realistic
spacetimes. The most popular approach to developing causal set dynamics is based on the " sum-over-histories" version of quantum mechanics. This approach would perform a "sum-over-causal sets" by "growing" a causal set one element at a time. Elements would be added according to quantum mechanical rules and interferencewould ensure a large manifold-like spacetime would dominate the contributions. The best model for dynamics at the moment is a classical model in which elements are added according to probabilities. This model, due to David Rideout and Rafael Sorkin, is known as "classical sequential growth" (CSG) dynamics [D.P. Rideout, R.D. Sorkin; "A classical sequential growth dynamics for causal sets", Phys. Rev D, 6, 024002 (2000) ] . The classical sequential growth model is a way to generate causal sets by adding new elements one after another. Rules for how new elements are added are specified and, depending on the parameters in the model, different causal sets result.
Causal set theory bibliography
* [http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0601121 The causal set approach to quantum gravity] a review article by Joe Henson on causal sets
* [http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v59/p521 Space-time as a causal set] - one of the first papers by Luca Bombelli, Joohan Lee, David Meyer, and Rafael D. Sorkin
* [http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/causal_sets/index.html Geometry from order: causal sets] - non-technical article by Rafael D. Sorkin on [http://www.einstein-online.info/en Einstein Online]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Causal set theory bibliography — Main article: Causal Sets This Causal Set Theory Bibliography is intended to aid causal set research. It gathers together academic papers, books, talks and PhD theses related to causal set theory and is intended to help readers find references… … Wikipedia
Causal dynamical triangulation — Beyond the Standard Model Standard Model … Wikipedia
Causal structure — This article is about the possible causal relationships among points in a Lorentzian manifold. For classification of Lorentzian manifolds according to the types of causal structures they admit, see Causality conditions. In mathematical physics,… … Wikipedia
General relativity — For a generally accessible and less technical introduction to the topic, see Introduction to general relativity. General relativity Introduction Mathematical formulation Resources … Wikipedia
List of mathematics articles (C) — NOTOC C C closed subgroup C minimal theory C normal subgroup C number C semiring C space C symmetry C* algebra C0 semigroup CA group Cabal (set theory) Cabibbo Kobayashi Maskawa matrix Cabinet projection Cable knot Cabri Geometry Cabtaxi number… … Wikipedia
Spacetime — For other uses of this term, see Spacetime (disambiguation). Two dimensional analogy of spacetime distortion. Matter changes the geometry of spacetime, this (curved) geometry being interpreted as gravity. White lines do not represent the… … Wikipedia
Loop quantum gravity — Not to be confused with the path integral formulation of LQG, see spin foam. This article is about LQG in its Canonical formulation.. Beyond the Standard Model … Wikipedia
Rafael Sorkin — Rafael Dolnick Sorkin is an American physicist. He is professor emeritus of physics at Syracuse University and the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, and a Fellow of the American Physical Society. He is best known as initiator and main… … Wikipedia
Causality (physics) — Causality [Green, Celia (2003). The Lost Cause: Causation and the Mind Body Problem . Oxford: Oxford Forum. ISBN 0 9536772 1 4. Includes three chapters on causality at the microlevel in physics.] [Bunge, Mario (1959). Causality: the place of the… … Wikipedia
Order theory — For a topical guide to this subject, see Outline of order theory. Order theory is a branch of mathematics which investigates our intuitive notion of order using binary relations. It provides a formal framework for describing statements such as… … Wikipedia