A radiological weapon (or radiological dispersion device, RDD) is any weapon that is designed to spread
radioactive materialwith the intent to kill, and cause disruption upon a city or nation. It is primarily known as a dirty bombbecause it is not a true nuclear weaponand does not yield the same destructive power. It uses conventional explosives to spread radioactive material, most commonly the spent fuels from nuclear power plants or radioactive medical waste.
Radiological weapons have been suggested as a possible weapon of terrorism used to create panic and casualties in densely populated areas. They could also render a great deal of property useless for an extended period, unless costly
remediationwas undertaken. The radiological source and quality greatly impacts the effectiveness of a radiological weapon.
Factors such as: energy and type of radiation,
half-life, size of explosion, availability, shielding, portability, and the role of the environment will determine the effect of the radiological weapon. Radioisotopes that pose the greatest security risk include: SimpleNuclide|Link|Caesium|137, used in radiological medical equipment, SimpleNuclide|Link|Cobalt|60, SimpleNuclide|Link|Americium|241, SimpleNuclide|Link|Californium|252, SimpleNuclide|Link|Iridium|192, SimpleNuclide|Link|Plutonium|238, SimpleNuclide|Link|Strontium|90, and SimpleNuclide|Link|Radium|226. All of these isotopes, except for the latter, are created in nuclear power plants. While the amount of radiation dispersed from the event will likely be minimal, the fact of any radiation may be enough to cause panic and disruption.
The history of radioactive weaponry may be traced to a 1943 memo to Brigadier General Leslie Groves of the
Manhattan Project. Transmitting a report entitled, "Use of Radioactive Materials as a Military Weapon," the memo states:
cquote|"As a gas warfare instrument the material would ... be inhaled by personnel. The amount necessary to cause death to a person inhaling the material is extremely small. It has been estimated that one millionth of a gram accumulating in a person's body would be fatal. There are no known methods of treatment for such a casualty.... It cannot be detected by the senses; It can be distributed in a dust or smoke form so finely powdered that it will permeate a standard gas mask filter in quantities large enough to be extremely damaging...."
"Radioactive warfare can be used [...] To make evacuated areas uninhabitable; To contaminate small critical areas such as rail-road yards and airports; As a radioactive poison gas to create casualties among troops; Against large cities, to promote panic, and create casualties among civilian populations."
"Areas so contaminated by radioactive dusts and smokes, would be dangerous as long as a high enough concentration of material could be maintained.... they can be stirred up as a fine dust from the terrain by winds, movement of vehicles or troops, etc., and would remain a potential hazard for a long time."
"These materials may also be so disposed as to be taken into the body by ingestion instead of inhalation. Reservoirs or wells would be contaminated or food poisoned with an effect similar to that resulting from inhalation of dust or smoke. Four days production could contaminate a million gallons of water to an extent that a quart drunk in one day would probably result in complete incapacitation or death in about a month's time."
The United States, however, chose not to pursue radiological weapons during World War II, though early on in the project considered it as a backup plan in case nuclear fission proved impossible to tame. Some US policymakers and scientists involved in the project felt that radiological weapons would qualify as chemical weapons and thus violate international law.
One possible way of dispersing the material is by using a “
dirty bomb,” a conventional explosive which disperses radioactive material. Dirty bombs are not a type of nuclear weapon, which requires a nuclear chain reactionand the creation of a critical mass. Whereas a nuclear weapon will usually create mass casualties immediately following the blast, a dirty bomb scenario would initially cause only minimal casualties from the conventional explosion.
radiological warfarethat do not rely on any specific weapon, but rather on spreading radioactive contamination via a food chainor water table, seem to be more effective in some ways, but share many of the same problems as chemical warfare.
Radiological weapons are widely considered to be militarily useless for a state-sponsored army and are initially not hoped to be used by any military forces. Firstly, the use of such a weapon is of no use to an occupying force, as the target area becomes uninhabitable. Furthermore, area-denial weapons are generally of limited use to an attacking army, as it slows the rate of advance. However, there are new proofs regarding the usage of radiological weapons espcially projectiles with depleted uranium being used widely by the occupying forces in Iraq and Afghanistan leading to fatal illnesses observed by the soldiers like Gulf war syndrome.Finally, like
biological weapons, radiological weapons can take days to act on the opposing force, especially causing cancer to a larger population and increase in the statistics of the birth defects. They therefore not only fail in neutralizing the opposing force instantly, but they also allow time for massive retaliation which has been observed in Iraq.
dirty bombis a radiological weapon dispersed with conventional explosives.
There is currently (as of
2007) an ongoing debate about the damage that terrorists using such a weapon might inflict. Many experts believe that a dirty bombsuch that terrorists might reasonably be able to construct would be unlikely to harm more than a few people and hence it would be no more deadly than a conventional bomb. Hence, this line of argument goes, the objectively dominant effect would be the moral and economic damage due to the massive fear and panic such an incident would spur. On the other hand, some believe that the fatalities and injuries might be in fact much more severe. This point is, e.g., made by physicists Peter D Zimmermanet al. ( King's College London) who reexamined the Goiânia accidentwhich is arguably comparable. (Ref.: [http://www.nature.com/nsu/040503/040503-3.html Nature Science Update of 5 May 2004] )
Weapons of mass destruction
* [http://qualitychoices.us/stevemoyer/docs/rdd.htm Radiological Preparedness]
* [http://alsos.wlu.edu/qsearch.aspx?browse=warfare/Radiological+Dispersal+Devices+(RDD) Annotated bibliography for radiological dispersal devices (RDD) from the Alsos Digital Library for Nuclear Issues]
* Cuger Brant; A VERY DIRTY BUSINESS; thriller: Scenario and effects of ‘Dirty Bomb’ going off in Tunbridge Wells, Kent [http://www.amazon.com/dp/1424135389/]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
radiological weapon — radiologinis ginklas statusas T sritis apsauga nuo naikinimo priemonių apibrėžtis MNG, kurio veikimas pagrįstas radioaktyviųjų medžiagų naudojimu žmonėms pažeisti, aplinkai, technikai ir kt. objektams užteršti. Radiologinį ginklą sudaro↑ kovinės… … Apsaugos nuo naikinimo priemonių enciklopedinis žodynas
radiological weapon — noun A weapon, often a bomb designed to achieve injury or contamination of a target using by dispersing harmful radioisotopes … Wiktionary
Radiological warfare — is any form of warfare involving deliberate radiation poisoning, without relying on nuclear fission or nuclear fusion.Radiological weapons are normally considered weapons of mass destruction, and are very commonly equated with a radiological bomb … Wikipedia
Weapon of mass destruction — For the Hip hop album, see Weapons of Mass Destruction (album). Weapons of mass destruction … Wikipedia
weapon of mass destruction — (WMD) The term used to describe a massive weapon with the capacity to kill indis criminately large numbers of people. The phrase broadly includes nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. It entered widespread popular usage in relation to the… … Glossary of UK Government and Politics
weapon of mass destruction — noun A chemical, biological, radiological nuclear or other weapon that is designed to cause death or serious injury to large numbers of civilians … Wiktionary
Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear — For the cyanogen bromide molecular formula, see CBrN. CBRN (pronounced C BORN or C BURN) is an initialism for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear. It is used to refer to situations in which any of these four hazards have presented… … Wikipedia
Chemical weapon designation — Chemical, biological, and radiological warfare agents are sometimes assigned what is termed a military symbol. Military symbols evolved out of the First World War from the British in part for secrecy, and to simplify reference to chemicals by… … Wikipedia
Nuclear weapon design — The first nuclear weapons, though large, cumbersome and inefficient, provided the basic design building blocks of all future weapons. Here the Gadget device is prepared for the first nuclear test: Trinity. Nuclear weapon designs are physical,… … Wikipedia
nuclear weapon(s) accident — An unexpected event involving nuclear weapons or radiological nuclear weapon components that results in any of the following; a. accidental or unauthorized launching, firing, or use by United States forces or United States supported allied forces … Military dictionary