# Axiom of pairing

In

axiomatic set theory and the branches oflogic ,mathematics , andcomputer science that use it, the**axiom of pairing**is one of theaxiom s ofZermelo-Fraenkel set theory .**Formal statement**In the

formal language of the Zermelo-Frankel axioms, the axiom reads::$forall\; A\; ,\; forall\; B\; ,\; exist\; C\; ,\; forall\; D\; ,\; [\; D\; in\; C\; iff\; (D\; =\; A\; or\; D\; =\; B)]$or in words::Given any set "A" and any set "B", there is a set "C" such that, given any set "D", "D" is a member of "C"if and only if "D" is equal to "A" or "D" is equal to "B".or in simpler words::Given two sets, there is a set whose members are exactly the two given sets.

**Interpretation**What the axiom is really saying is that, given two sets "A" and "B", we can find a set "C" whose members are precisely "A" and "B".We can use the

axiom of extensionality to show that this set "C" is unique.We call the set "C" the "pair" of "A" and "B", and denote it {"A","B"}.Thus the essence of the axiom is::Any two sets have a pair.{"A","A"} is abbreviated {"A"}, called the "singleton" containing "A".Note that a singleton is a special case of a pair.The axiom of pairing also allows for the definition of

ordered pairs . For any sets $a$ and $b$, theordered pair is defined by the following::$(a,\; b)\; =\; \{\; \{\; a\; \},\; \{\; a,\; b\; \}\; \}.,$

Note that this definition satisfies the condition

:$(a,\; b)\; =\; (c,\; d)\; iff\; a\; =\; c\; and\; b\; =\; d.$

Ordered "n"-tuples can be defined recursively as follows:

:$(a\_1,\; ldots,\; a\_n)\; =\; ((a\_1,\; ldots,\; a\_\{n-1\}),\; a\_n).!$

**Non-independence**The axiom of pairing is generally considered uncontroversial, and it or an equivalent appears in just about any alternative

axiomatization of set theory. Nevertheless, in the standard formulation of theZermelo–Fraenkel set theory , the axiom of pairing follows theaxiom schema of replacement applied to any given set with two or more elements, and thus it is sometimes omitted. The existence of such a set with two elements, such as { {}, { {} } }, can be deduced either from theaxiom of empty set and theaxiom of power set or from theaxiom of infinity .**Generalisation**Together with the

axiom of empty set , the axiom of pairing can be generalised to the following schema::$forall\; A\_1\; ,\; ldots\; ,\; forall\; A\_n\; ,\; exist\; C\; ,\; forall\; D\; ,\; [D\; in\; C\; iff\; (D\; =\; A\_1\; or\; cdots\; or\; D\; =\; A\_n)]$that is::Given any finite number of sets "A"_{1}through "A"_{"n"}, there is a set "C" whose members are precisely "A"_{1}through "A"_{"n"}.This set "C" is again unique by the axiom of extension, and is denoted {"A"_{1},...,"A"_{"n"}}.Of course, we can't refer to a "finite" number of sets rigorously without already having in our hands a (finite) set to which the sets in question belong.Thus, this is not a single statement but instead a schema, with a separate statement for each

natural number "n".

*The case "n" = 1 is the axiom of pairing with "A" = "A"_{1}and "B" = "A"_{1}.

*The case "n" = 2 is the axiom of pairing with "A" = "A"_{1}and "B" = "A"_{2}.

*The cases "n" > 2 can be proved using the axiom of pairing and theaxiom of union multiple times.For example, to prove the case "n" = 3, use the axiom of pairing three times, to produce the pair {"A"_{1},"A"_{2}}, the singleton {"A"_{3}}, and then the pair "A"_{1},"A"_{2}},{"A"_{3}.The axiom of union then produces the desired result, {"A"_{1},"A"_{2},"A"_{3}}. We can extend this schema to include "n"=0 if we interpret that case as theaxiom of empty set .Thus, one may use this as an

axiom schema in the place of the axioms of empty set and pairing. Normally, however, one uses the axioms of empty set and pairing separately, and then proves this as atheorem schema. Note that adopting this as an axiom schema will not replace theaxiom of union , which is still needed for other situations.**Another alternative**Another axiom which implies the axiom of pairing in the presence of the

axiom of empty set is :$forall\; A\; ,\; forall\; B\; ,\; exist\; C\; ,\; forall\; D\; ,\; [D\; in\; C\; iff\; (D\; in\; A\; or\; D\; =\; B)]$.Using {} for "A" and "x" for B, we get {"x"} for C. Then use {"x"} for "A" and "y" for "B", getting {"x,y"} for C. One may continue in this fashion to build up any finite set. And this could be used to generate allhereditarily finite set s without using theaxiom of union .**References***Paul Halmos, "Naive set theory". Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1960. Reprinted by Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974. ISBN 0-387-90092-6 (Springer-Verlag edition).

*Jech, Thomas, 2003. "Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded". Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.

*Kunen, Kenneth, 1980. "Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs". Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-86839-9.

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*

### Look at other dictionaries:

**Axiom of regularity**— In mathematics, the axiom of regularity (also known as the axiom of foundation) is one of the axioms of Zermelo Fraenkel set theory and was introduced by harvtxt|von Neumann|1925. In first order logic the axiom reads::forall A (exists B (B in A)… … Wikipedia**Axiom of union**— In axiomatic set theory and the branches of logic, mathematics, and computer science that use it, the axiom of union is one of the axioms of Zermelo Fraenkel set theory, stating that, for any set x there is a set y whose elements are precisely… … Wikipedia**set theory**— the branch of mathematics that deals with relations between sets. [1940 45] * * * Branch of mathematics that deals with the properties of sets. It is most valuable as applied to other areas of mathematics, which borrow from and adapt its… … Universalium**Kripke–Platek set theory**— The Kripke–Platek axioms of set theory (KP) (IPAEng|ˈkrɪpki ˈplɑːtɛk) are a system of axioms of axiomatic set theory, developed by Saul Kripke and Richard Platek. The axiom system is written in first order logic; it has an infinite number of… … Wikipedia**Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory**— Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, with the axiom of choice, commonly abbreviated ZFC, is the standard form of axiomatic set theory and as such is the most common foundation of mathematics.ZFC consists of a single primitive ontological notion, that of… … Wikipedia**Implementation of mathematics in set theory**— This article examines the implementation of mathematical concepts in set theory. The implementation of a number of basic mathematical concepts is carried out in parallel in ZFC (the dominant set theory) and in NFU, the version of Quine s New… … Wikipedia**Constructible universe**— Gödel universe redirects here. For Kurt Gödel s cosmological solution to the Einstein field equations, see Gödel metric. In mathematics, the constructible universe (or Gödel s constructible universe), denoted L, is a particular class of sets… … Wikipedia**List of axioms**— This is a list of axioms as that term is understood in mathematics, by Wikipedia page. In epistemology, the word axiom is understood differently; see axiom and self evidence. Individual axioms are almost always part of a larger axiomatic… … Wikipedia**List of mathematics articles (A)**— NOTOC A A Beautiful Mind A Beautiful Mind (book) A Beautiful Mind (film) A Brief History of Time (film) A Course of Pure Mathematics A curious identity involving binomial coefficients A derivation of the discrete Fourier transform A equivalence A … Wikipedia**Binary set**— A binary set is a set with (exactly) two distinct elements, or, equivalently, a set whose cardinality is two.Examples: * The set { a , b } is binary. * The set { a , a } is not binary, since it is the same set as { a }, and is thus a singleton.In … Wikipedia