A carbon sink is reservoir of
carbonthat accumulates and stores carbon for an indefinite period. The main natural sinks are:
# Absorption of carbon dioxide by the
Photosynthesisby plants and algae
The process by which carbon sinks remove CO2 from the atmosphere is known as carbon
sequestration. Public awareness of the significance of CO2 sinks has grown since passage of the Kyoto Protocol, which promotes their use as a form of carbon offset.
Because growing vegetation absorbs
carbon dioxide, the Kyoto Protocolallows countries that have large areas of forest (or other vegetation) to deduct a certain amount from their emissions, thus making it easier for them to achieve the desired net emission levels.
Some countries seek to trade emission rights in carbon emission markets, purchasing the unused carbon emisson allowances of other countries. If overall limits on greenhouse gas emission are put into place, "cap-and-trade" market mechanisms are purported to find cost-effective ways to reduce emissions. [cite web | url=http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-RPT-Renewables.pdf | archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070604191032/http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-RPT-Renewables.pdf | archivedate=2007-06-04 | title=Electricity, Renewables, and Climate Change: Searching for a Cost-Effective Policy | author=Karen Palmer and Dallas Burtraw | publisher=
Resources for the Future|format=PDF] There is as yet no carbon audit regimefor all such markets globally, and none is specified in the Kyoto Protocol. National carbon emissons are self-declared.
Clean Development Mechanism, only afforestationand reforestationare eligible to produce carbon audit regimes (CERs) in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (2008–2012). Forest conservation activities or activities avoiding deforestation, which would result in emission reduction through the conservation of existing carbon stocks, are not eligible at this time. [Manguiat, M. S. Z., Verheyen, R., Mackensen, J. & Scholz, G. (2005), "Legal aspects in the implementation of CDM forestry projects", number 59 in ‘IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Papers’, IUCN. Available from: http://www.iucn.org/themes/law/pdfdocuments/EPLP59EN.pdf] Also, agricultural carbon sequestration is not possible yet. [Rosenbaum, K. L., Schoene, D. & Mekouar, A. (2004), "Climate change and the forest sector. Possible national and subnational legislation", number 144 in ‘FAO Forestry Papers’, FAO. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5647e/y5647e00.HTM]
torage in vegetation and soils
Carbon stored in soils oxidizes rapidly; this, in addition to high rainfall levels, is the reason why tropical jungles have very thin organic soils. The forest eco-system may eventually become carbon neutral. Forest fires release absorbed carbon back into the atmosphere, as does deforestation due to rapidly increased oxidation of soil organic matter.Fact|date=September 2008
The dead trees, plants, and moss in
peatbogs undergo slow anaerobic decompositionbelow the surface of the bog. This process is slow enough that in many cases the bog grows rapidly and fixes more carbon from the atmosphere than is released. Over time, the peat grows deeper. Peat bogs inter approximately one-quarter of the carbon stored in land plants and soils. [cite web | last =Chester | first =Bronwyn | authorlink = | coauthors = | title =The case of the missing sink | work = | publisher=McGill Reporter |date= 20 April 2000| url =http://www.mcgill.ca/reporter/32/15/roulet/ | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2008-07-08]
Under some conditions, forests and peat bogs may become sources of CO2, such as when a forest is flooded by the construction of a hydroelectric dam. Unless the forests and peat are harvested before flooding, the rotting vegetation is a source of CO2 and
methanecomparable in magnitude to the amount of carbon released by a fossil-fuel powered plant of equivalent power. [cite web | url=http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7046 | title=Hydroelectric power's dirty secret revealed | publisher= New Scientist| date= 24 February 2005| accessdate=2008-07-08 | author=Duncan Graham-Rowe]
Regenerative agriculture, if practiced on the planet’s 3.5 billion tillable acres, could sequester up to 40% of current CO2 emissions. [A [http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/files/Rodale_Research_Paper.pdf report] recently released by [http://www.hero-farmers.org/ Rodale Institute] and based on nearly 30 years of research in its side-by-side studies of organic and conventional agriculture.] [ [http://www.grist.org/feature/2008/05/09/index.html?source=rss Timothy LaSalle of Rodale on the surprising climate benefits of organic farming | By Anna Lappé | Grist | Grist Feature | 09 May 2008 ] ] Agricultural carbon sequestration has the potential to substantially mitigate global warming impacts. When using biologically based regenerative practices, this dramatic benefit can be accomplished with no decrease in yields or farmer profits. Organically managed soils can convert carbon dioxide from a greenhouse gas into a food-producing asset.
In 2006, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion were estimated at nearly 6.5 billion tons. If a 2,000 lb/ac/year sequestration rate was achieved on all convert|434000000|acre|km2 of cropland in the United States, nearly 1.6 billion tons of carbon dioxide would be sequestered per year, mitigating close to one quarter of the country's total fossil fuel emissions. This is the emission-cutting equivalent of taking one car off the road for every two acres under 21st Century regenerative agricultural management (based on a vehicle average of 15,000 miles per year at 23 mpg; U.S. EPA
Oceansare natural CO2 sinks, and represent the largest active carbon sink on Earth. This role as a sink for CO2 is driven by two processes, the solubility pumpand the biological pump. [cite journal
last = Raven | first = J. A. | authorlink = | coauthors = P. G. Falkowski | title = Oceanic sinks for atmospheric CO2 | journal = Plant Cell & Environment | volume = 22 | issue = | pages = 741–755 | publisher = | year = 1999 | url = | doi = | id = | accessdate = ] The former is primarily a function of differential CO2 solubility in
seawaterand the thermohaline circulation, while the latter is the sum of a series of biological processes that transport carbon (in organic and inorganic forms) from the surface euphotic zone to the ocean's interior. A small fraction of the organic carbon transported by the biological pump to the seafloor is buried in anoxic conditions under sediments and ultimately forms fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas.
At the present time, approximately one third [cite journal | last = Takahashi | first = T. | authorlink = | coauthors = S. C. Sutherland, C. Sweeney, A. Poisson, N. Metzl, B. Tilbrook, N. Bates, R. Wanninkhof, R. A. Feely, C. Sabine, J. Olafsson and Y. C. Nojiri | title = Global sea-air CO2 flux based on climatological surface ocean "p"CO2, and seasonal biological and temperature effects | journal = Deep Sea Research II | volume = 49 | issue = | pages = 1601–1622 | publisher = | year = 2002 | url = | doi = | id = | accessdate = ] of
anthropogenicemissions are estimated to be entering the ocean. The solubility pump is the primary mechanism driving this, with the biological pump playing a negligible role. This stems from the limitation of the biological pump by ambient light and nutrients required by the phytoplanktonthat ultimately drive it. Total inorganic carbonis not believed to limit primary productionin the oceans, so its increasing availability in the ocean does not directly affect production (the situation on land is different, since enhanced atmospheric levels of CO2 essentially "fertilize" land plant growth). However, ocean acidificationby invading anthropogenic CO2 may affect the biological pump by negatively impacting calcifying organisms such as coccolithophores, foraminiferansand pteropods. Climate changemay also affect the biological pump in the future by warming and stratifying the surface ocean, thus reducing the supply of limiting nutrients to surface waters.
Carbon as plant
organic matteris sequestered in soils, and soils contain more carbon than is contained in vegetation and the atmosphere combined. [cite web | last =Swift | first =Roger S. | authorlink = | coauthors = | title =Soil Science - Abstract: Volume 166(11) November 2001 p 858-871 SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON BY SOIL. | work = | publisher = | month =November | year =2001 | url =http://www.soilsci.com/pt/re/soilsci/abstract.00010694-200111000-00010.htm;jsessionid=Lz5GXHt22sF0RQH0PlT5NRRzkQ344VBrJCr9522nbHdPSJPy7kcn!1151209438!181195628!8091!-1 | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2007-02-23] Plant litteraccumulates as organic matter in soils, and is degraded by chemical weatheringand biological degradation. More recalcitrant organiccarbon polymers such as cellulose, hemi-cellulose, lignin, aliphatic compounds, waxes and terpenoidsare collectively retained as humus. [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V67-4PKG610-2&_user=866177&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=866177&md5=fc8af43e2355ab834430eebc8b81ef1d] Leaf litterand humusis rapidly oxidized and poorly retained in sub-tropicaland tropical climateconditions due to high temperatures and extensive leaching by rainfall. This is part of the reason why tropical soils under jungles are so thin, despite the rapid accumulation of organic material on the jungle floor. Areas where shifting cultivationor slash and burnagriculture are practiced are generally only fertile for 2–3 years before they are abandoned. These tropical jungles are similar to coral reefs in that they are highly efficient at conserving and circulating necessary nutrients, which explains their lushness in a nutrient desert.Fact|date=May 2007 The mass of organic carbon retained in many agricultural areas world-wide have been severely depleted due to intensive farming practices. Grasslandscontribute to soil organic matter, mostly in the form of their extensive fibrous root mats. Due in part to the climactic conditions of these regions (e.g. cooler temperatures and semi-arid to arid conditions), these soils can accumulate significant quantities of organic matter. This can vary based on variances in rainfall, the length of the winter season, and the frequency of naturally occurring lightning-induced grass-fires. While these fires release carbon dioxide, they improve the quality of the grass-lands overall, in turn increasing the amount of carbon retained in the retained humic material. They also deposit carbon directly to the soil in the form of char that does not significantly degrade back to carbon dioxide.
Enhancing natural sequestration
Forests are carbon stores, and they are carbon dioxide sinks when they are increasing in density or area. In Canada's boreal forests as much as 80% of the total carbon is stored in the soils as dead organic matter. [CFS Science Policy Note May, 2007 url=http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/news/473] Tropical
reforestationcan mitigate global warming until all available land has been reforested with mature forests. However, the global cooling effect of carbon sequestration by forests is partially counterbalanced in that reforestation can decrease the reflection of sunlight ( albedo). Mid-to-high latitude forests have a much lower albedo during snow seasons than flat ground, thus contributing to warming. Modeling that compares the effects of albedo differences between forests and grasslands suggests that expanding the land area of forests in temperate zones offers only a temporary cooling benefit. [cite web | url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6184577.stm | title=Care needed with carbon offsets | author=Jonathan Amos | publisher= BBC| accessdate=2008-07-08] [cite web | url=https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2005/NR-05-12-04.html | title=Models show growing more forests in temperate regions could contribute to global warming | date= 5 December 2005
publisher=Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | accessdate=2008-07-08] [cite journal | author=S. Gibbard, K. Caldeira, G. Bala, T. J. Phillips, and M. Wickett | title = Climate effects of global land cover change | journal=Geophysical Research Letters | volume=32 | month=December | year=2005] [cite web | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12460485?dopt=abstractplus | title=Forests, carbon and global climate | author=Y. Malhi, P. Meir, and S. Brown | publisher=Institute of Ecology and Resource Management | date=
15 August 2002| accessdate=2008-07-08]
In the United States in 2004 (the most recent year for which EPA statistics [cite web | url=http://epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html | title=U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reports | publisher=EPA | accessdate=2008-07-08] are available), forests sequestered 10.6% (637 teragramscite web | url=http://epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads06/06LULUCF.pdf | title=Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry | publisher=EPA | accessdate=2008-07-08|format=PDF] ) of the carbon dioxide released in the United States by the combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas; 5657 teragramscite web | url=http://epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads06/06ES.pdf | title=Executive Summary | publisher=EPA | accessdate=2008-07-08|format=PDF] ). Urban trees sequestered another 1.5% (88 teragrams). To further reduce U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by 7%, as stipulated by the
Kyoto Protocol, would require the planting of "an area the size of Texas[8% of the area of Brazil] every 30 years". [William H. Schlesinger, dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences at Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina.] Carbon offsetprograms are planting millions of fast-growing trees per year to reforest tropical lands, for as little as $0.10 per tree; over their typical 40-year lifetime, one million of these trees will fix 0.9 teragrams of carbon dioxide [cite web | url=http://www.treesftf.org/about/cooling.htm | title=About Us: Global Cooling Center | publisher=Trees for the Future] .In Canada, reducing timber harvesting would have very little impact on carbon dioxide emissions because of the combination of harvest and stored carbon in manufactured wood products along with the regrowth of the harvested forests. Additionally, the amount of carbon released from harvesting is small compared to the amount of carbon lost each year to forest fires and other natural disturbances. [ CFS Science Policy Note May, 2007 url=http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/news/473]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changeconcluded that "a sustainable forest management strategy aimed at maintaining or increasing forest carbon stocks, while producing an annual sustained yield of timber fibre or energy from the forest, will generate the largest sustained mitigation benefit." [cite web | url=http://www.ipcc.ch/ | title=IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) ]
Life expectancy of forests varies throughout the world, influenced by tree species, site conditions and natural disturbance patterns. In some forests carbon may be stored for centuries, while in other forests carbon is released with frequent stand replacing fires. Forests that are harvested prior to stand replacing events allow for the retention of carbon in manufactured forest products such as lumber. However, only a portion of the carbon removed from logged forests ends up as durable goods and buildings. The remainder ends up as sawmill by-products such as pulp, paper and pallets, which often with incineration (resulting in carbon release into the atmosphere) at the end of their lifecycle. For instance, of the 1,692 teragrams of carbon harvested from forests in Oregon and Washington (U.S) from 1900 to 1992, only 23% is in long-term storage in forest products. [cite web | url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/u51867621j8307m7/ | title=Harmon, Harmon, Ferrell and Brooks. Modeling Carbon Stores in Oregon and Washington Forest Products 1900–1992. Climate Change 33:521-550 (1996).]
One way to increase the carbon sequestration efficiency of the oceans is to add micrometre-sized iron particles in the form of either
hematite(iron oxide) or melanterite(iron sulfate) to certain regions of the ocean. This has the effect of stimulating growth of plankton. Iron is an important nutrient for phytoplankton, usually made available via upwelling along the continental shelves, inflows from rivers and streams, as well as deposition of dust suspended in the atmosphere. Natural sources of ocean iron have been declining in recent decades, contributing to an overall decline in ocean productivity (NASA, 2003). Yet in the presence of iron nutrients plankton populations quickly grow, or 'bloom', expanding the base of biomassproductivity throughout the region and removing significant quantities of CO2 from the atmosphere via photosynthesis. A test in 2002 in the Southern Oceanaround Antarcticasuggests that between 10,000 and 100,000 carbon atoms are sunk for each iron atom added to the water. More recent work in Germany (2005) suggests that any biomass carbon in the oceans, whether exported to depth or recycled in the euphotic zone, represents long-term storage of carbon. This means that application of iron nutrients in select parts of the oceans, at appropriate scales, could have the combined effect of restoring ocean productivity while at the same time mitigating the effects of human caused emissions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Because the effect of periodic small scale phytoplankton blooms on ocean ecosystems is unclear, more studies would be helpful. Phytoplankton have a complex effect on cloud formation via the release of substances such as
dimethyl sulfide(DMS) that are converted to sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere, providing cloud condensation nuclei, or CCN. But the effect of small scale plankton blooms on overall DMS production is unknown.
Other nutrients such as nitrates, phosphates, and silica as well as iron may cause ocean fertilization. There has been some speculation that using pulses of fertilization (around 20 days in length) may be more effective at getting carbon to ocean floor than sustained fertilization. [cite web | url=http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/p25.pdf | title=Sequestration of CO2 by ocean fertilization | author=Michael Markels, Jr and Richard T. Barber | publisher=NETL Conference on Carbon Sequestration | date=May 14–17, 2001 | accessdate=2008-07-08 |format=PDF]
There is some controversy over seeding the oceans with iron however, due to the potential for increased toxic phytoplankton growth (e.g. "
red tide"), declining water quality due to overgrowth, and increasing anoxia in areas harming other sea-life such as zooplankton, fish, coral, etc. [cite web | url=http://www.greenseaventure.com/Questions_Concerns.html | title=Questions and Concerns | publisher=GreenSea Venture | accessdate=2008-07-08] [cite journal | url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T8F-4DH2JCT-1&_user=10&_coverDate=12%2F30%2F2004&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=013c171e38287b45b13181a8fb73aa03 | title=Effects of selenium, iron and cobalt addition to growth and yessotoxin production of the toxic marine dinoflagellate Protoceratium reticulatum in culture | doi = 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.08.014 | journal=Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology | author=Simon M. Mitrovica, Monica Fernández Amandia, Lincoln McKenzieb, Ambrose Fureya and Kevin J. James | volume=313 | issue=2 | date= 30 December 2004| pages=337–351 | accessdate=2008-07-08]
Since the 1850s, a large proportion of the world's grasslands have been tilled and converted to croplands, allowing the rapid oxidation of large quantities of soil organic carbon. However, in the United States in 2004 (the most recent year for which EPA statistics are available), agricultural soils including pasture land sequestered 0.8% (46 teragrams) as much carbon as was released in the United States by the combustion of fossil fuels (5988 teragrams). The annual amount of this sequestration has been gradually increasing since 1998.
Methods that significantly enhance carbon sequestration in soil include
no-till farming, residue mulching, cover cropping, and crop rotation, all of which are more widely used in organic farmingthan in conventional farming. [cite web | url=http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/July05/organic.farm.vs.other.ssl.html | title=Organic farming produces same corn and soybean yields as conventional farms, but consumes less energy and no pesticides, study finds | author=Susan S. Lang | date= 13 July, 2005| accessdate=2008-07-08] [Pimentel, David, et al, Bioscience: 55:7, July 2005] Because only 5% of US farmland currently uses no-till and residue mulching, there is a large potential for carbon sequestration. [cite journal |quotes= |last=Lal |first=R |authorlink= |coauthors=et al |year=2004 |month=April |title=Managing Soil Carbon |journal=Science |volume=304 |issue= |pages=393 |id= |url=http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/304/5669/393?maxtoshow=&HITS=&hits=&RESULTFORMAT=&author1=Morgan%2C+mg&fulltext=soil&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT | doi = 10.1126/science.1093079 |accessdate= |pmid=15087532 ] Conversion to pastureland, particularly with good management of grazing, can sequester even more carbon in the soil. Terra preta, an anthropogenic, high-carbon soil, is also being investigated as a sequestration mechanism. By pyrolysing biomass, about half of its carbon can be reduced to charcoal, which can persist in the soil for centuries, and makes a useful soil amendment, especially in tropical soils (" biochar" or "agrichar"). [cite web | url=http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/biochar/Biochar_home.htm | title=Biochar: the new frontier | author=Johannes Lehmann | accessdate=2008-07-08] cite news | first=Mark | last=Horstman | title=Agrichar – A solution to global warming? | date=2007-09-23 | publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation | url =http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s2012892.htm | work =ABC TV Science: Catalyst | accessdate = 2008-07-08 ]
Controlled burns on far north Australian savannas can result in an overall carbon sink. One working example is the West Arnhem Fire Management Agreement, started to bring "strategic fire management across 28,000 km² of Western Arnhem Land". Deliberately starting controlled burns early in the dry season results in a mosaic of burnt and unburnt country which reduces the area of burning compared with stronger, late dry season fires. In the early dry season there are higher moisture levels, cooler temperatures, and lighter wind than later in the dry season; fires tend to go out overnight. Early controlled burns also results in a smaller proportion of the grass and tree biomass being burnt. cite web|url=http://savanna.ntu.edu.au/information/arnhem_fire_project.html |title=West Arnhem Land Fire Abatement Project |accessdate=2008-07-08 |work=Savanna Information |publisher=Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre ] Emission reductions of 256,000 tonnes of CO2 have been made as at 2007. cite web|url=http://savanna.ntu.edu.au/news/topical_savannas109.html |title=Eureka Win for West Arnhem Land Fire Project |accessdate=2008-07-08 |work=Savanna Information |publisher=Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre ]
For carbon to be sequestered artificially (i.e. not using the natural processes of the carbon cycle) it must first be captured, "or" it must be significantly delayed or prevented from being re-released into the atmosphere (by combustion, decay, etc.) from an existing carbon-rich material, by being incorporated into an enduring usage (such as in construction). Thereafter it can be passively stored "or" remain productively utilized over time in a variety of ways.
For example, upon harvesting, wood (as a carbon-rich material) can be immediately burned or otherwise serve as a fuel, returning its carbon to the atmosphere, "or" it can be incorporated into construction or a range of other durable products, thus sequestering its carbon over years or even centuries. One ton of dry wood is equivalent to 1.8 tons of Carbon dioxide.
Indeed, a very carefully-designed and durable, energy-efficient and energy-capturing building has the potential to sequester (in its carbon-rich construction materials), as much as or more carbon than was released by the acquisition and incorporation of all its materials and than will be released by building-function "energy-imports" during the structure's (potentially multi-century) existence. Such a structure might be termed "carbon neutral" or even "carbon negative". Building construction and operation (electricity usage, heating, etc) are estimated to contribute nearly "half" of the annual human-caused carbon additions to the atmosphere. [cite web | last =| first =| authorlink = | coauthors = | title=Climate Change, Global Warming, and the Built Environment - Architecture 2030| work = | publisher = | date =| url =http://www.architecture2030.org | format = | doi = | accessdate = 2007-02-23]
Natural-gaspurification plants often already have to remove carbon dioxide, either to avoid dry iceclogging gas tankers or to prevent carbon-dioxide concentrations exceeding the 3% maximum permitted on the natural-gas distribution grid.
Beyond this, one of the most likely early applications of carbon capture is the capture of carbon dioxide from
flue gases at power stations (in the case of coal, this is known as " clean coal"). A typical new 1000-MW coal-fired power stationproduces around 6 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. Adding carbon capture to existing plants can add significantly to the costs of energy production; scrubbing costs aside, a 1000-MW coal plant will require the storage of about 50 million barrels of carbon dioxide a year. However, scrubbing is relatively affordable when added to new plants based on coal gasificationtechnology, where it is estimated to raise energy costs for households in the United States using only coal-fired electricity sources from 10 cents per kWh to 12 cents. [cite journal | title=Can We Bury Global Warming? | author=Robert H. Socolow | journal= Scientific American| month=July | year=2005 | pages=42]
Currently, capture of carbon dioxide is performed on a large scale by absorption of carbon dioxide onto various amine-based solvents. Other techniques are currently being investigated, such as
pressure swing adsorption, temperature swing adsorption, gas separation membranes, and cryogenics. Recent pilot studies include flue capture and conversion to baking sodaand use of algaefor conversion to fuel or feed.
In coal-fired power stations, the main alternatives to retrofitting amine-based absorbers to existing power stations are two new technologies: coal gasification combined-cycle and
Oxy-fuel combustion. Gasification first produces a " syngas" primarily of hydrogenand carbon monoxide, which is burned, with carbon dioxide filtered from the flue gas. Oxy-fuel combustion burns the coal in oxygeninstead of air, producing only carbon dioxide and water vapour, which are relatively easily separated. Some of the combustion products must be returned to the combustion chamber, either before or after separation, otherwise the temperatures would be too high for the turbine.
Another long-term option is carbon capture directly from the air using
hydroxides. The air would literally be scrubbed of its CO2 content. This idea offers an alternative to non-carbon-based fuels for the transportation sector.
Examples of carbon sequestration at coal plants include converting carbon from smokestacks into baking soda, [utility company [http://www.luminant.com/ Luminant] 's pilot version at its [http://www.luminant.com/plants/big_brown.aspx Big Brown Steam Electric Station] in
Fairfield, Texas] [ [http://www.skyonic.com/theCompany.php Skyonic] plans to circumvent storage problems of liquid CO2 by storing baking soda in mines, landfills, or simply to be sold as industrial or food-grade baking soda.] and algae-based carbon capture, circumventing storage by converting algae into fuel or feed. [ [http://www.greenfuelonline.com/index.html GreenFuel Technologies Corp.] ]
Another proposed form of carbon sequestration in the ocean is direct injection. In this method, carbon dioxide is pumped directly into the water at depth, and expected to form "lakes" of liquid CO2 at the bottom. Experiments carried out in moderate to deep waters (350 - 3600 m) indicate that the liquid CO2 reacts to form solid CO2
clathrate hydrates, which gradually dissolve in the surrounding waters.
This method, too, has potentially dangerous environmental consequences. The carbon dioxide does react with the water to form
carbonic acid, H2CO3; however, most (as much as 99%) remains as dissolved molecular CO2. The equilibrium would no doubt be quite different under the high pressure conditions in the deep ocean. In addition, if deep-sea bacterial methanogensthat reduce carbon dioxide were to encounter the carbon dioxide sinks, levels of methanegas may increase, leading to the generation of an even worse greenhouse gas [ [http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0428/p01s04-wogi.html Potent greenhouse-gas methane has been rising | csmonitor.com ] ] .The resulting environmental effects on benthiclife forms of the bathypelagic, abyssopelagicand hadopelagiczones are unknown. Even though life appears to be rather sparse in the deep ocean basins, energy and chemical effects in these deep basins could have far-reaching implications. Much more work is needed here to define the extent of the potential problems.
Carbon storage in or under oceans may not be compatible with the
Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter[cite web | url=http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2005-07-04a.7044.h | title=Carbon Sequestration | author=Norman Baker and Ben Bradshaw | accessdate=2008-07-08 | date= 4 July 2005] .
An additional method of long-term ocean-based sequestration is to gather
crop residuesuch as corn stalks or excess hay into large weighted bales of biomass and deposit it in the alluvial fanareas of the deep ocean basin. Dropping these residues in alluvial fans would cause the residues to be quickly buried in silt on the sea floor, sequestering the biomass for very long time spans. Alluvial fans exist in all of the world's oceans and seas where river deltas fall off the edge of the continental shelfsuch as the Mississippi alluvial fan in the gulf of Mexicoand the Nile alluvial fan in the Mediterranean Sea. A downside, however, would be an increase in aerobic bacteria growth due to the introduction of biomass, leading to more competition for oxygen resources in the deep sea, similar to the oxygen minimum zone.
The method of "geo-sequestration" or "geological storage" involves injecting carbon dioxide directly into underground geological formations. Declining
oil fields, saline aquifers, and unminable coal seams have been suggested as storage sites. Caverns and old mines that are commonly used to store natural gas are not considered, because of a lack of storage safety.
CO2 has been injected into declining oil fields for more than 40 years, to increase oil recovery. This option is attractive because the storage costs are offset by the sale of additional oil that is recovered. Typically, 10-15% additional recovery of the original oil in place is possible. Further benefits are the existing infrastructure and the geophysical and geological information about the oil field that is available from the oil exploration. All oil fields have a geological barrier preventing upward migration of oil. As most oil and gas has been in place for millions to tens of millions of years, depleted oil and gas reservoirs can contain carbon dioxide for millennia. Identified possible problems are the many 'leak' opportunities provided by old oil wells, the need for high injection pressures and acidification which can damage the geological barrier. Other disadvantages of old oil fields are their limited geographic distribution and depths, which require high injection pressures for sequestration. Below a depth of about 1000 m, carbon dioxide is injected as a supercritical fluid, a material with the density of a liquid, but the viscosity and diffusivity of a gas.Unminable coal seams can be used to store CO2, because CO2 absorbs to the coal surface, ensuring safe long-term storage. In the process it releases methane that was previously adsorbed to the coal surface and that may be recovered. Again the sale of the methane can be used to offset the cost of the CO2 storage, although release or burning of methane would of course at least partially offset the obtained sequestration result.
Saline aquifers contain highly mineralized brines and have so far been considered of no benefit to humans except in a few cases where they have been used for the storage of chemical waste. Their advantages include a large potential storage volume and relatively common occurrence reducing the distance over which CO2 has to be transported. The major disadvantage of saline aquifers is that relatively little is known about them compared to oil fields. To keep the cost of storage acceptable the geophysical exploration may be limited, resulting in larger uncertainty about the structure of a given aquifer. Unlike storage in oil fields or coal beds, no side product will offset the storage cost. Leakage of CO2 back into the atmosphere may be a problem in saline-aquifer storage. However, current research shows that several "trapping mechanisms" immobilize the CO2 underground, reducing the risk of leakage.
A major research project examining the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide is currently being performed at an oil field at Weyburn in south-eastern
Saskatchewan. In the North Sea, Norway's Statoilnatural-gas platform Sleipnerstrips carbon dioxide out of the natural gas with amine solvents and disposes of this carbon dioxide by geological sequestration. Sleipner reduces emissions of carbon dioxide by approximately one million tonnes a year. The cost of geological sequestration is minor relative to the overall running costs. As of April 2005, BPis considering a trial of large-scale sequestration of carbon dioxide stripped from power plant emissions in the Miller oilfieldas its reserves are depleted.
In October 2007, the
Bureau of Economic Geologyat The University of Texas at Austinreceived a 10-year, $38 million subcontract to conduct the first intensively monitored, long-term project in the United States studying the feasibility of injecting a large volume of CO2 for underground storage ["Bureau of Economic Geology Receives $38 Million for First Large-Scale U.S. Test Storing Carbon Dioxide Underground" [http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/news/rels/102407.html] ] . The project is a research program of the [http://www.sseb.org/currentprograms/cpa_cmi.htm Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB)] , funded by the National Energy Technology Laboratoryof the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The SECARB partnership will demonstrate CO2 injection rate and storage capacity in the Tuscaloosa-Woodbinegeologic system that stretches from Texas to Florida. Beginning in fall 2007, the project will inject CO2 at the rate of one million tons per year, for up to 1.5 years, into brine up to convert|10000|ft|m below the land surface near the Cranfield oil fieldabout convert|15|mi|km east of Natchez, Mississippi. Experimental equipment will measure the ability of the subsurface to accept and retain CO2.
Mineral sequestration aims to trap carbon in the form of solid
carbonatesalts. This process occurs slowly in nature and is responsible for the deposition and accumulation of limestone(calcium carbonate) over geologic time. Carbonic acidin groundwater slowly reacts with complex silicatesto dissolve calcium, magnesium, alkalisand silicaand leave a residue of clay minerals. The dissolved calcium and magnesium react with bicarbonateto precipitate calcium and magnesium carbonates, a process that organisms use to make shells. When the organisms die, their shells are deposited as sediment and eventually turn into limestone. Limestones have accumulated over billions of years of geologic time and contain much of Earth's carbon. Ongoing research aims to speed up similar reactions involving alkali carbonates ["Carbon-capture Technology To Help UK Tackle Global Warming", "ScienceDaily" July 27, 2007, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070727091001.htm] .
One proposed reaction is that of the rock
dunite, or its hydrated equivalent serpentinitewith carbon dioxide to form the carbonate mineral magnesite, plus silica and iron oxide ( magnetite).
Serpentinite sequestration is favored because of the non-toxic and predictable nature of magnesium carbonate. However, the ideal reaction (reaction 1) takes place only with extremely
magnesium-rich olivineor serpentineminerals. The presence of ironin the olivine or serpentine will reduce the efficiency of the circuit and reactions 2 and 3 must take place, producing a slagof silicaand magnetite.
"Mg-Olivine + Water + Carbon dioxide → Serpentine + Magnesite + Silica "
:(Mg)2SiO4 + nH2O + CO2 → Mg3 [Si2O5(OH)4] + MgCO3 + SiO2 + H2O (This is a non stoichiometric reaction just to show the principle).
"Fe-Olivine + Water + Carbonic acid → Serpentine + Magnetite + Magnesite + Silica ":4(Fe,Mg)2SiO4 + nH2O + H2CO3 → 2Mg3 [Si2O5(OH)4] + 2Fe3O4 + 2MgCO3 + SiO2 + H2O
"Serpentine + carbon dioxide → Magnesite + silica + water"
:Mg3 [Si2O5(OH)4] + 3CO2 → 3MgCO3 + 2SiO2 + 2H2O
Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks
Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks is a
metal-organic frameworkcarbon dioxide sink which could be used to keep industrial emissions of carbon dioxideout of the atmosphere. [ [http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/02/15/tech-carbon-capture.html CBC News] article "New materials can selectively capture CO2, scientists say" published February 15, 2008]
Carbon capture and storage
Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change
North American Carbon Program
* [http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/carboncapture/carbonsequestration.html Carbon Sequestration News] Recent news articles on CO2 capture and storage.
* [http://www.beg.utexas.edu/environqlty/co201.htm Gulf Coast Carbon Center] University of Texas at Austin research center that investigates geologic storage of anthropogenic carbon dioxide in the Gulf Coast region.
* [http://www.sinkswatch.org/ SinksWatch] - An initiative to track and scrutinize carbon sink projects
* [http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/index.html National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Carbon Sequestration Home Page]
* [http://cdiac2.esd.ornl.gov/ U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science Carbon Sequestration Research Programs]
*cite web |url=http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/carbon_seq/2005_roadmap_for_web.pdf |title= U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory - Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap |archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20070604191032/http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/carbon_seq/2005_roadmap_for_web.pdf |archivedate=2007-06-04|format=PDF
* [http://www.offsetopportunity.com/ The Carbon Offset Opportunity Program: A Tool for Collaborative Carbon Sequestration Project Development]
* [http://sequestration.mit.edu/ Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies Program at MIT]
* [http://www.co2captureandstorage.info/ International industry R&D group focussed on CO2 sequestration]
* [http://www.co2captureproject.org/reports/reports.htm CO2 Capture Project]
* [http://www.princeton.edu/~cmi/ Carbon Mitigation Initiative]
* [http://www.sseb.org/currentprograms/cpa_cmi.htm Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB)]
* [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1195633.htm 'Catalyst' on Australian science TV on geosequestration]
* [http://www.nacarbon.org/ The U.S. North American Carbon Program]
* [http://pangea.stanford.edu/~mhesse/NewsLinks.html Collection of recent news articles on CO2 capture and storage]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2784227.stm Synthetic Trees Could Purify Air]
* [http://www.casmgs.colostate.edu/ The Consortium for Agricultural Soil Mitigation of Greenhouse Gases]
* [http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/sccs/ Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage Research]
* [http://www.ceem.unsw.edu.au/content/documents/Diesendorf_Coal-Geoseq.pdf Can geosequestration save the coal industry?]
* [http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1901661.htm Short documentary on Australian research into limits on carbon uptake by trees]
* FAO (2004) [http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5738e/y5738e00.htm Carbon sequestration in dryland soils]
*IEA Reports: [http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/putcback.pdf Putting carbon back into the ground (pdf)] and [http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/oceanrep.pdf Ocean storage of CO2 (pdf)]
*Haszeldine (2005) [http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/research/subsurface/diagenesis/CO2_sites_biofuel.pdf Deep geological CO2 storage: principles, and prospecting for bio-energy disposal sites (pdf)]
*The Role of Carbon in Agricultural Soils "in" Carbon Sequestration - A Better Alternative for Climate Change? Chapter 1: Agricultural Sinks (1999) University of Maryland [http://www.puaf.umd.edu/faculty/nelson/carbseq/pdf/1.pdf pdf format] [http://www.puaf.umd.edu/faculty/nelson/carbseq/CHAPTER%201.doc doc format]
* Schlesinger, W.H. 1991. "Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change". Academic Press, San Diego.
* [http://www.mcgill.ca/reporter/32/15/roulet/ Peat bogs may be soaking up 10 to 20% of the excess CO2 generated by human activity]
* [http://saga.pmel.noaa.gov/review/dms_climate.html DMS and Climate]
* [http://www.ilea.org/birdsey/index.html Carbon Store in U.S. Forests]
* [http://pangea.stanford.edu/~mhesse/NewsLinks.html Collection of recent news articles on CO2 capture and storage]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3930245.stm Britain entertains the idea]
Seattle Times", 20 February 2004, [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001861641_carbon19.html Canada pumps CO2 underground] Dead link|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001861641_carbon19.html|date=July 2008(Weyburn oil field)
* [http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0624/p02s02-usgn.html United States pumps CO2 underground]
24 April 2005[http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/apr/24/environment.environment Seabed supplies a cure for global warming crisis]
* [http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/fact_sheets/t2_21.shtml Tyndall Centre - Assessing the potential for geological carbon sequestration in the UK]
* [http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/29/climate.change.soda/index.html "Baking soda could help save planet" - Luminant pilot in Texas]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
carbon sink — UK US noun [C] ► ENVIRONMENT an area of forest which is large enough to absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide from the air and therefore to reduce the effect of global warming: »Healthy forests are carbon sinks, pulling in more greenhouse gases… … Financial and business terms
carbon sink — noun An area, rich in natural flora, that absorbs more carbon dioxide than it produces • • • Main Entry: ↑carbon … Useful english dictionary
carbon sink — n a large area of forest that is believed to help the environment by taking in ↑carbon from the air so that the effects of ↑global warming are reduced … Dictionary of contemporary English
carbon sink — /kabən ˈsɪŋk/ (say kahbuhn singk) noun a natural or human made reservoir able to store carbon for a long period of time, thus reducing the level of greenhouse gases. A natural carbon sink may be a large area of vegetation, such as a protected… … Australian English dictionary
carbon sink — UK / US noun [countable] Word forms carbon sink : singular carbon sink plural carbon sinks an ocean, forest, or other area of vegetation (= plants and trees) that helps to protect the environment by taking in large amounts of carbon dioxide from… … English dictionary
Carbon sink — A reservoir that absorbs or takes up released carbon from another part of the carbon cycle. The four sinks, which are regions of the Earth within which carbon behaves in a systematic manner, are the atmosphere, terrestrial biosphere (usually… … Energy terms
carbon sink — noun Ecology a forest, ocean, or other natural environment viewed in terms of its ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere … English new terms dictionary
Carbon sequestration — is the capture of carbon dioxide (CO2) and may refer specifically to: The process of removing carbon from the atmosphere and depositing it in a reservoir.  When carried out deliberately, this may also be referred to as carbon dioxide removal,… … Wikipedia
Carbon dioxide — Carbon dioxide … Wikipedia
Carbon dioxide equivalent — (CDE) and Equivalent carbon dioxide (or CO2) are two related but distinct measures for describing how much global warming a given type and amount of greenhouse gas may cause, using the functionally equivalent amount or concentration of carbon… … Wikipedia