An insurgency is a violent internal uprising against a sovereign government that lacks the organization of a revolution. Its definition is similar to that of "resistance," but has different connotations. Usage of the term varies widely, and is highly subjective. For example, from the perspective of US leaders, the Viet Cong in the Vietnam War were insurgents. [ [Pentagon Papers] http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pentagon/pent11.htm] But according to the majority of the population of South Vietnam, they were leaders of the nationalist resistance movement to US occupation. [ [American Power and the New Mandarins] ]
The following discussion illustrates how the definition becomes blurred under political influence.
The French expert on Indochina and Vietnam,
Bernard Fall, entitled one of his major books "Street without joy: insurgency in Indochina, 1946-63". citation
title = Street without joy: insurgency in Indochina, 1946-63
first = Bernard B. | last = Fall
publisher = Literature House (China)
edition = 3rd
year = 1964] Fall himself, however, wrote later on that "revolutionary warfare" might be a more accurate term. citation
title = The Theory and Practice of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency
first = Bernard B. | last = Fall
date = April 1965 Issue
journal = U.S.
Naval War CollegeReview
url = http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/navy/art5-w98.htm] Insurgency has been used for years in professional military literature. Under the British, the situation in Malaya (now Malaysia) was often called the "Malayan insurgency". citation
title = Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam: Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife
journal = Military Review
date = May-June, 2004
first = Lester W. | last =Grau
url =http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PBZ/is_2004_May-June/ai_n6123976 ] , or "the Troubles" in
Northern Ireland. Insurgencies have existed in many countries and regions, including the Philippines, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Kashmir, Yemen, Djibouti, Colombia, Sri Lanka, and Democratic Republic of the Congo, the American colonies of Great Britain, and the Confederate States of America.citation
title = A Proof-of-Concept Model for Evaluating Insurgency Management Policies Using the System Dynamics Methodology
journal = Strategic Insights
first = Edward G., Jr. | last = Anderson
url = http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2007/Aug/andersonAug07.asp] Each had different specifics but share the property of an attempt to disrupt the central government by means considered illegal by that government. North points out, however, that insurgents today need not be part of a highly organized movement:
"Some are networked with only loose objectives and mission-type orders to enhance their survival. Most are divided and factionalized by area, composition, or goals. Strike one against the current definition of insurgency. It is not relevant to the enemies we face today. Many of these enemies do not currently seek the overthrow of a constituted government...weak government control is useful and perhaps essential for many of these “enemies of the state” tosurvive and operate."citation
title = Redefining Insurgency
first = Chris | last = North
journal = Military Review
date = January-February 2008
url = http://usacac.army.mil/CAC/milreview/English/JanFeb08/NorthINSIGHTSJanFeb08.pdf
publisher = U.S. Army Combined Arms Center]
Iraqi insurgencyhas been used to describe the guerillaresistance to the US-led coalition forces and the new Iraqi Government in Iraqcitation
url = http://www.comw.org/warreport/fulltext/03alexander.pdf
title = The Iraqi Insurgent Movement
first1 = Christopher | last1 =Alexander | first2 = Charles | last2 = Kyle | first3 =William | last3 = McCallister
publisher = Commonwealth Institute
date = November 14, 2003]
A variety of terms, none precisely defined, all fall under the category of insurgency: rebellion, uprisings, etc. The value of the formal models discussed below is to have a taxonomy to categorize insurgencies. No two insurgencies are identical. The basis of the insurgency can be political, economic, religious, or ethnic, or a combination of factors. For example, "
The Troubles" of Northern Ireland are most often described as Protestantversus Catholic, but there was significant economic disparity that contributed to the conflict. Fall as well as the United States Marine Corpshave used "small wars"; the Marine "Small Wars Manual" was a pre-World War II classic reference.citation
year = 1940
url = http://www.smallwars.quantico.usmc.mil/sw_manual.asp
title = Small Wars Manual
United States Marine Corps] The Northern Irish situation has been called terrorism,citation
url = http://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page24.html
title = Northern Ireland |publisher = MI5 |accessdate = 2007-10-02] an
ethnic conflict,cite web |url = http://www.passia.org/seminars/2004/John-Coakley-Ireland-Seminar.htm |first = John |last= Coakley |title = Ethnic Conflict and the Two-state Solution: The Irish Experience of Partition |accessdate = 2007-10-02] a guerrilla war,cite web |url = http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0920/p01s01-woiq.html |title= Classic Guerrilla war forming in Iraq |first = Brad |last = Knickerbocker |work = Christian Science Monitor |date = 2004-09-20|accessdate = 2007-10-02] a low intensity conflict, and sometimes a civil war. The term Irish Civil Waris, however, more often used for the 1922-1923 conflict.
Iraq is not unique in having only a government and multiple sets of insurgents. Historic insurgencies, such as the
Russian Civil War, have been multipolar rather than a straightforward model made up of two sides. While the Angolan Civil Warhad two main sides, MPLAand UNITA. FLEC, however, was a simultaneous separatist movement for the independence of the Cabindaregion. Multipolarity extends the definition of insurgency to situations where there is no recognized authority, as in the Somali Civil War, especially the period, from 1998 to 2006, where it broke into quasi-autonomous smaller states, fighting among one another in changing alliances.
Working toward definition
If there is a rebellion against an constituted authority (for example an authority recognised as such by the United Nations) and those taking part in the rebellion are not recognised as
belligerents then the rebellion is an insurgency. [ Oxford English Dictionarysecond edition 1989 "insurgent B. n. One who rises in revolt against constituted authority; a rebel who is not recognized as a belligerent."] However not all rebellions are insurgencies, as state of belligerency may exist between one or more sovereign states and rebel forces. For example during the American Civil War, the Confederate States of America, was not recognized as a sovereign state, but it was recognized as a belligerent power, and thus Confederate warships were given the same rights as United States warships in foreign ports.
When insurgency is used to describe a movement's unlawfulness by virtue of not being authorized by or in accordance with the
lawof the land, its use is neutral. However when it is used by a state or another authority under threat, "insurgency" often also carries an implication that the rebels cause is illegitimate, whereas those rising up will see the authority itself as being illegitimate.
The use of the term insurgency does recognise the political motivation of those who participate in an insurgency, while the term
brigandryimplies no political motivation. If an uprising has little support (for example those who continue to resist towards the end of an armed conflict when most of their allies have surrendered) then such a resistance may be described as brigandry and those who participate as brigands. [Francis Lieber, Richard Shelly Hartigan "Lieber's Code and the Law of War", Transaction Publishers, 1983 ISBN 0913750255, 9780913750254. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7eRfPo2jvx8C&pg=PA95&lpg=PA95 p. 95] ] [ Oxford English Dictionarysecond edition 1989 brigandry "1980 Guardian Weekly 28 Dec. 14/2 Today the rebels wound, mutilate, and kill civilians: where do you draw the fine line between subversion and brigandry?"]
The distinction on whether an uprising is an insurgency or a belligerency has not been as clearly codified as many other areas covered by the internationally accepted laws of war for two reasons. The first is that international law traditionally does not encroach on matter which are solely the internal affairs of a sovereign state (although recent developments such as the
responsibility to protectis starting to undermine this traditional approach). The second is because at the Hague Conference of 1899 there was disagreement between the Great Powers who considered " francs-tireurs" to be unlawful combatantssubject to execution on capture and smaller states who maintained that they should be considered lawful combatants. The dispute resulted in a compromise wording being included in the Hague Conventions known as the Martens Clauseafter the diplomat who drafted the clause. [Ticehurst, Rupert. " [http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/57JNHY The Martens Clause and the Laws of Armed Conflict] " 30 April, 1997, International Review of the Red Cross no 317, p.125-134 ISSN|1560-7755. Ticehurst in footnote 1 cites The life and works of Martens are detailed by V. Pustogarov, "Fyodor Fyodorovich Martens (1845-1909) — A Humanist of Modern Times", "International Review of the Red Cross" (IRRC), No. 312, May-June 1996, pp. 300-314. Also Ticehurst in his footnote 2 cites F. Kalshoven, "Constraints on the Waging of War", Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987, p. 14.]
Third Geneva Convention, as well as the other Geneva Conventions, are oriented to conflict involving nation-states, and only loosely address irregular forces:
"Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements..."citation
url = http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/375?OpenDocument
title = Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Third Geneva Convention)
contribution = Commentary on Article 3
date= 12 August 1949]
United States Department of Defense(DOD) defines it as "An organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict." The new United States counterinsurgency Field Manual,citation | publisher = US Department of the Army | first1 = John A. | last1 = Nagl | first2 = David H.| last2 = Petraeus | first3 = James F. | last3 =Amos |first4 = Sarah | last4 = Sewall
title = Field Manual 3-24 Counterinsurgency
comment = While military manuals rarely show individual authors,
David Petraeusis widely described as establishing many of this volume's concepts.
date = December 2006
url = http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf
accessdate = 2008-02-03 ] proposes a structure that includes both "insurgency" and "counterinsurgency" [COIN] . ("italics" in original)
Insurgency and its tactics are as old as warfare itself. Joint doctrine defines an "insurgency" as an organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through the use of subversion and armed conflict.citation
last = US Department of Defense
authorlink = United States Department of Defense
title = Joint Publication 1-02 Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
date = 12 July 2007
id = JP 1-02 | url = http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf | accessdate = 2007-11-21] These definitions are a good starting point, but they do not properly highlight a key paradox: though insurgency and COIN are two sides of a phenomenon that has been called revolutionary war or internal war, they are distinctly different types of operations. In addition, insurgency and COIN are included within a broad category of conflict known as irregular warfare.
This definition does not consider the morality of the conflict, or the different viewpoints of the government and the insurgents. It is focused more on the operational aspects of the types of actions taken by the insurgents and the counterinsurgents.
quotation|The Department of Defense’s (DOD) definition focuses on the type of violence employed(unlawful) towards specified ends (political, religious or ideological). This characterization failsto address the argument from moral relativity that “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedomfighter.” In essence, this objection to a suitable definition submits that while violence may be“unlawful” in accordance with a victim’s statutes, the cause served by those committing the actsmay represent a positive good in the eyes of neutral observers.|Michael F. Morris
Insurgencies differ in their use of tactics. Some elements of an insurgency may use
bombs, kidnappings, hostage-taking, s, shootings and other techniques to target the establishment's power structure and other facilities, often with little regard for civilian casualtiesor deliberately targetting civilians in a terroristcampain. Other elements may restrict their attacks to military objectives and avoid the targeting of civilians. Many times, insurgent groups conduct violent attacks but do not reveal the group's identity or leader.
As an example of a definition that does not cover all insurgencies, consider that of Robert R. Tomes, and then consider the
French Revolution(e.g., no cell system), American Revolution(e.g., little to no attempt to terrorize civilians), or consecutive coups in 1977 and 1999 Pakistan (e.g., initial actions focused internally to the government rather than seeking broad support). Tomes spoke of four requisites:citation
url = http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/PARAMETERS/04spring/tomes.pdf
first = Robert R. | last = Tomes
journal = Parameters
title = Relearning Counterinsurgency Warfare
publisher = United States Army War College
year = 2004] in a 2004 article, identifies four elements that "typically encompass an insurgency":
#cell-networks that maintain secrecy
terrorismused to foster insecurity among the population and drive them to the movement for protection
#multifaceted attempts to cultivate support in the general population, often by undermining the new regime
#attacks against the government
This definition fits well with Mao's Phase I , but does not deal well with larger civil wars. Mao does assume terrorism is usually part of the early phases, but it is not always present in revolutionary insurgency.
Tomes offers an indirect definition of insurgency, drawn from
Trinquier's definition of counterinsurgency: "an interlocking system of actions—political, economic, psychological, military—that aims at the [insurgents’ intended] overthrow of the established authority in a country and its replacement by another regime" citation
url = http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/resources/csi/trinquier/trinquier.asp
year = 1961
first = Roger| last = Trinquier | authorlink = Roger Trinquier
title = Modern Warfare: A French View of Counterinsurgency
publisher = Editions de la Table Ronde ]
title = Rethinking Insurgency
url = http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/Pubs/display.cfm?pubID=790
first = Steven | last = Metz
publisher = Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College
date = 5 June 2007] observes that past models of insurgency do not perfectly fit modern insurgency, in that current instances are far more likely to have a multinational or transnational character than those of the past. Several insurgencies may belong to more complex conflicts, involving "third forces (armed groups which affect the outcome, such as militias) and fourth forces (unarmed groups which affect the outcome, such as international media), who may be distinct from the core insurgents and the recognized government. While overt state sponsorship becomes less common, sponsorship by transnational groups is more common. "The nesting of insurgency within complex conflicts associated with state weakness orfailure..." [see the discussion of failed states below] Metz suggests that contemporary insurgencies have far more complex and shifting participation than traditional wars, where discrete belligerents seek a clear strategic victory.
General dictionary definitions [Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary [http://m-w.com/dictionary/insurgency] ] [Ask Oxford [http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=searchresults&freesearch=insurgency&branch=&textsearchtype=exact] ] [Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/insurgency] ] [Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=41252&dict=CALD] ] [One Look Dictionary Search [http://www.onelook.com/?w=insurgency&ls=a] ] are rarely adequateOr|date=August 2008, as the reality is that there is no simple definition that will fit into the few paragraphs available in such references. Unfortunately, public statements by politicians and media, for a variety of reasons, tend to oversimplify conflicts to a point where major issues and tactics are lost.Fact|date=August 2008
Not all insurgencies include terrorism, with the caveat that there is no universally accepted definition of terrorism. While there is no accepted definition in international law, a
United Nations-sponsored working definitions include one drafted by Alex P. Schmidfor the Policy Working Group on theUnited Nations and Terrorism. Reporting to the Secretary-General in 2002, the Working Group stated the following:
Without attempting a comprehensive definition of terrorism, it would be useful todelineate some broad characteristics of the phenomenon. Terrorism is, in most cases,essentially a political act. It is meant to inflict dramatic and deadly injury on civiliansand to create an atmosphere of fear, generally for a political or ideological (whethersecular or religious) purpose. Terrorism is a criminal act, but it is more than merecriminality. To overcome the problem of terrorism it is necessary to understand itspolitical nature as well as its basic criminality and psychology. The United Nationsneeds to address both sides of this equation.”citation
author = Secretary General's Policy Working Group on the United Nations and Terrorism
journal = Focus on Crime and Society
volume = 4
issues = 1 & 2
date = December 2004
id = (A/57/273-S/2002/875, annex)
url = http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Forum/V05-81059_EBOOK.pdf
title = Preface ]
Yet another conflict of definitions involves insurgency versus terrorism. The winning essay of the 24th Annual
United States Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of StaffStrategic Essay Contest, by Michael F. Morris, said [A pure terrorist group] "may pursue political, even revolutionary, goals, but their violence replaces rather than complements a political program."citation
title = Al Qaeda as Insurgency
first = Michael F. | last = Morris
year = 2005
United States Army War College
url = http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/ksil234.pdf] Morris made the point that the use, or non-use, of terrorism does not define insurgency, "but that organizational traits have traditionally provided another means to tell the two apart. Insurgencies normally field fighting forces orders of magnitude larger than those of terrorist organizations." Insurgencies have a political purpose, and may provide social services and have an overt, even legal, political wing. Their covert wing carries out attacks on military forces with tactics such as raids and ambushes, as well as acts of terror such as attacks that cause deliberate civilian casualties.
Mao considered terrorism a basic part of his first part of the three phases of revolutionary warfare. Several insurgency models recognize that completed acts of terrorism widen the security gap; the Marxist guerrilla theoretician Carlos Marighella specifically recommended acts of terror, as a means of accomplishing something that fits the concept of opening the security gap.citation
url = http://www.marxists.org/archive/marighella-carlos/1969/06/minimanual-urban-guerrilla/index.htm
first = Carlos | last = Marighella
year = 1969
title = Minimanual of the Urban Guerrilla] Mao considered terrorism to be part of forming a guerilla movement.
While not every insurgency involves terror, most involve an equally hard to define tactic, subversion. "When a country is being subverted it is not being outfought; it is being out-administered. Subversion is literally administration with a minus sign in front." The exceptional cases of insurgency without subversion are those when there is no accepted government that is providing administrative services.
While it is less commonly used by current U.S. spokesmen, that may be due to the hyperbolic way it was used in the past, in a specifically anticommunist context. U.S. Secretary of State
Dean Ruskdid in April 1962, when he declared that urgent action was required before the “enemy’s subversive politico-military teams find fertile spawning grounds for their fish eggs.” citation
title = Subversion and Insurgency
first = William | last = Rosenau
publisher = RAND National Defense Research Institute
year = 2007]
In a Western context, Rosenau cites a British
Secret Intelligence Servicedefinition as "a generalized intention to (emphasis added) “overthrow or undermine parliamentary democracy by political, industrial or violent means.” While insurgents do not necessarily use terror, it is hard to imagine any insurgency meeting its goals without undermining aspects of the legitimacy or power of the government or faction it opposes. Rosenau mentions a more recent definition that suggests subversion includes measures short of violence, which still serve the purposes of insurgents. Rarely, subversion alone can change a government; this arguably happened in the liberalization of Eastern Europe.Fact|date=August 2008 To the Communist government of Poland, Solidarityappeared subversive but not violent.Fact|date=August 2008
Overt and covert wings
An insurgency often splits its programs into a covert armed faction and an overt "front group", denying connections between them. One example would be the appropriate incarnation of the
Irish Republican Armycoupled with the overt political party, Sinn Fein. See the Green Book for the training manual for new IRA recruits. Groups such as Hezbollahand Hamasprovide overt social services as well as having armed wings, the latter sometimes with a different name. The Vietnamese National Liberation Front,citation
first = Douglas | last = Pike
title = Viet Cong: The Organization and Technique of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam
publisher = MIT Press
year = 1968] the
FMLNin El Salvador, and the Tamil Eelamseparatists in Sri Lankaall use a dual political/social and armed approach.
coupis a special case of subversion, in which the group in opposition to the established government may be partially or exclusively a faction within that government. citation
first = Edward | last = Luttwak | authorlink = Edward Luttwak
title = Coup d'etat: a practical handbook
publisher = Harvard University Press
year = 1968] It is not at all uncommon to have a coup, by members of the government, while that government is simultaneously fighting an insurgency against a group outside the government. For example, the
1963 South Vietnamese coupagainst President Ngo Dinh Diemcame principally from military officers displeased less with the government's fight with the National Liberation Frontand more with repression of the nation's Buddhistmajority (see Buddhist Crisis). Civil War
There is no single accepted definition of "civil war", but it is a manifestation of insurgency, widely considered to meet two definitions:citation
date = November 26, 2006
journal = New York Times
title = A Matter of Definition: What Makes a Civil War, and Who Declares It So?
first = Edward | last = Wong
url = http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/world/middleeast/26war.html?pagewanted=print] :*The major warring groups must be from the same country and fighting for control of the political center, control over a separatist state or to force a major change in policy. There may be volunteers from other countries under the command of one or more of the warring groups.:*The second says that at least 1,000 people must have been killed in total, with at least 100 from each side.
Third Geneva Conventionspeaks of the "armed conflict not of an international character", interpreted by the International Committee of the Red Crossto include civil wars. Among those conditions listed are these four basic requirements.:*The party in revolt must be in possession of a part of the national territory.:*The insurgent civil authority must exercise de facto authority over the population within the determinate portion of the national territory.:*The insurgents must have some amount of recognition as a belligerent.:*The legal Government is “obliged to have recourse to the regular military forces against insurgents organized as military.”
Potential for insurgency and historical examples
Two broad categories of country are likely candidates for insurgency. The obvious category is of weak and failed states, but there are also needs in generally strong states that face specific problems. A special case is that of resistance movements in occupied areas, even when there a new government has formed and has international recognition.
As regards the United States, the 4th and 5th chapters of
Robert Struble, Jr.’s [http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/|"Treatise on Twelve Lights,"] , 2007-08 ed., distinguish between an agenda for an Article V Constitutional Convention (“Insurrection of Suede”, chapter 4), [Robert Struble, Jr., "Treatise on Twelve Lights", 2007-08 ed., chapter four, [http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/04-Insurrection%20of%20Suede.htm|"Insurrection of Suede."] ] , and his plan B, (“Recourse to the Sword,” chapter 5), wherein insurgents might turn, as a last resort, to armed insurrection. [Struble, "ibid"., chapter 5, [http://www.tell-usa.org/totl/05-Recourse%20to%20the%20Sword.htm|"Recourse to the Sword."] ] With either means, violent or not, the aim is radically to alter (or restore) the Constitution of a strong state.
There is much media and political focus on transnational terrorism, but insurgency can be national, or at least separatist within one nation and not involve terror. There is also a widespread and incorrect assumption, based on equating terror and insurgency, that insurgency is usually Islamic. Such an assumption can easily be challenged by examples, of which those marked with an asterisk clearly fall into more than one category, and the categories themselves are arbitrary. If a categorization seems incorrect, that reflects the difficulty in analyzing movements.
McCormick Magic Diamond
McCormick’s modelcite paper
title = The Shining Path and Peruvian terrorism
author = McCormick, Gordon
publisher = RAND Corporation
comment = often called Magic Diamond
id = Document Number: P-7297
year = 1987] is designed as a tool for counterinsurgency (COIN), but develops a symmetrical view of the required actions for both the Insurgent and COIN forces to achieve success. In this way the counterinsurgency model can demonstrate how both the insurgent and COIN forces succeed or fail. The model’s strategies and principle apply to both forces, therefore the degree the forces follow the model should have a direct correlation to the success or failure of either the Insurgent or COIN force.
The model depicts four key elements or players::#Insurgent Force:#Counterinsurgency force (i.e., the government):#Population:#International community. All of these interact, and the different elements have to assess their best options in a set of actions::#Gaining Support of the Population:#Disrupt Opponent’s Control Over the Population:#Direct Action Against Opponent:#Disrupt Opponent’s Relations with the International Community:#Establish Relationships with the International Community
Barnett and connecting to the core
In Thomas Barnett's paradigm,cite book
author = Barnett, Thomas P.M.
authorlink = Thomas P.M. Barnett
title = The Pentagon's New
publisher = Berkley Trade
year = 2005
ISBN-10 = 0425202399
id = Barnett-2005] the world is divided into a "connected core" of nations enjoying a high level of communications among their organizations and individuals, and those nations that are disconnected internally and externally. In a reasonably peaceful situation, he describes a "system administrator" force, often multinational, which does what some call "nation-building", but, most importantly, connects the nation to the core and empowers the natives to communicate -- that communication can be likened to swarm coordination. If the state is occupied, or in civil war, another paradigm comes into play: the leviathan, a first-world military force that takes down the opposition regular forces. Leviathan is not constituted to fight local insurgencies, but major forces. Leviathan may use extensive swarming at the tactical level, but its dispatch is a strategic decision that may be made unilaterally, or by an established group of the core such as
Cordesman and Security
Other than brief "Leviathan" takedowns, security building appears to need to be regional, with logistical and other technical support from more developed countries and alliances (e.g., ASEAN, NATO). Noncombat military assistance in closing the security gap begins with training, sometimes in specialized areas such as intelligence. More direct, but still noncombat support, includes intelligence, planning, logistics and communications.
Anthony Cordesman notes that security requirements differ by region and state in region. Writing on the Middle East, he identified different security needs for specific areas, as well as the US interest in security in those areas.citation
title = Security Cooperation in the Middle East
first = Anthony H. | last = Cordesman
date = 29 October 2007
publisher = Center for Strategic and International Studies
url = http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_pubs/task,view/id,4139/type,1/] :*In
North Africa, the US focus should be on security cooperation in achieving regional stability and in counterterrorism. :*In the Levant, the US must largely compartment security cooperation with Israel and cooperation with friendly Arab states like Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon, but can improve security cooperation with all these states.:*In the Gulf, the US must deal with the strategic importance of a region whose petroleum and growing gas exports fuel key elements of the global economy.
It is well to understand that counterterrorism, as used by Cordesman, does not mean using terrorism against the terrorism, but an entire spectrum of activities, nonviolent and violent, to disrupt an opposing terrorist organization. The French general, Joseph Gallieni, observed, while a colonial administrator in 1898,
A country is not conquered and pacified when a military operation has decimated its inhabitants and made all heads bow in terror; the ferments of revolt will germinate in the mass and the rancours accumulated by the brutal action of force will make them grow againcite web
author = McClintock, Michael
title = Great Power Counterinsurgency
publisher = Human Rights First
date = November 2005
Both Kilcullen and Eizenstat define a more abstract goal than does Cordesman. Kilcullen's security pillar is roughly equivalent to Eizenstat's security g
"This pillar most engages military commanders’ attention, but of course military means are applied across the model, not just in the security domain, while civilian activity is critically important in the security pillar also ... all three pillars must develop in parallel and stay in balance, while being firmly based in an effective information campaign."
Anthony Cordesman, while speaking of the specific situation in Iraq, makes some points that can be generalized to other nations in turmoil.cite web
title = The Importance of Building Local Capabilities: Lessons from the Counterinsurgency in Iraq
author = Cordesman, Anthony H.
authorlink = Anthony Cordesman
publisher = Center for Strategic and International Studies
url = http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_pubs/task,view/id,3411/type,1/
date = August 1, 2006] Cordesman recognizes some value in the groupings in
Samuel Huntington's idea of the clash of civilizations,cite book
title = The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
authorlink = Samuel P. Huntington
author = Huntington, Samuel P.
publisher= Simon & Schuster
year = 1996
ISBN-10 = 0684811642] but, rather assuming the civilizations must clash, these civilizations simply can be recognized as actors in a multinational world. In the case of Iraq, Cordesman observes that the burden is on the Islamic civilization, not unilaterally the West, if for no other reason that the civilization to which the problematic nation belongs will have cultural and linguistic context that Western civilization cannot hope to equal. The heart of strengthening weak nations must come from within, and that heart will fail if they deny that the real issue is the future of their civilization, if they tolerate religious, cultural or separatist violence and terrorism when it strikes at unpopular targets, or if they continue to try to export the blame for their own failures to other nations, religions, and cultures.
National Problems and Transnational Spillover
Developed and stable countries have their own reasons for helping weak states deal with insurgency, because insurgencies can have direct (e.g., terrorism, epidemic disease) or indirect (e.g., drug trade, economic instability in resources) effects on them. While ideological or religious terrorism is most frequently mentioned, it is, by no means, the only multinational problem that FID addresses, starting at the national level. When one of these problems is present in a state, it is likely to cause transnational "spillover effects".cite web
title = On the Brink, Weak States and US National Security
author = Weinstein, Jeremy M
coauthors = John Edward Porter and Stuart E. Eizenstat
date = 06/08/2004
url = http://www.cgdev.org/doc/books/weakstates/Full_Report.pdf
publisher = Center for Global Development] Problems include::*Blood diamonds:*Piracy:*Disease:*Illicit drugs:*Terrorism:*Ethnic cleansing:*Economic instability
Not only HN, but regional conflicts threaten to widen gaps. "Pretending that the conflicts in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Darfur, Iraq, Palestine and Sri Lanka are the problems of others or are going to solve themselves is not a solution. It should be noted that some states, especially in the
ASEANgroup, can be quite strong, but still have difficulties with piracy, terrorism, and drug traffic. There are a number of intelligence-sharing arrangements among countries in this area and the US FID assistance needs can involve economically strong countries in other regions. "Nigeria is among the top ten exporters of crude oil to the United States. ...when rebel leaders in the oil-rich Niger delta vowed to launch an “all-out war on the Nigerian state,” instability helped propel global oil prices to more than $50 per barrel.
These effects are not limited to terrorism, but include displaced population, often bearing disease. Transnational criminal networks may use weak nations as sanctuaries for high-value, low-volume commodities such as diamondscite web
title = Conflict Diamonds
publisher = United Nations Department of Public Information
date = March 21, 2001
url = http://www.un.org/peace/africa/Diamond.html ]
Illicit drug trade
Drugs also are high-value and low-volume. The
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime(UNODOC) observes
Drug cultivation thrives on instability, corruption and poor governance. The world's biggest drug producing centres are in regions beyond the control of the central government, like South Afghanistan, South-West Colombia and East Myanmar. Until government control, democracy and the rule of law are restored, these regions will remain nests of insurgency and drug production - and represent the biggest challenge to containment.Citation
title = World Drug Report 2007
author = United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime
url = http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/WDR-2007.html]
When a country's legitimate government is weak compared to its drug trade infrastructure, part of FID may be defeating that infrastructure, or, minimally, reducing its ability to corrupt or destroy government institutions.citation
title = The Need for Special Operations Forces in the Andean Region's Counter Drug Efforts
publisher = U.S. Army War College
author = Comodeca, Thomas J.
date = 07-04-2003
url = http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA415480&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
accessdate = 2007-12-15] .
Piracy is very real in the international waters of weak and failed states, such as Somalia.citation
url = http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/ksil546.pdf
date = 15 March 2006
title = The Role of the U.S. Navy in Support of the National Strategy for Marine Security
author = Winter, Peter J.
publisher = U.S. Army War College] When pirates are active, providing FID supplies by water is impractical unless the transport vessels are armed, or travel in convoy.
Piracy also may feed into security violations at ports, and as a means by which terrorists transport personnel and materials.cite web
url = http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL31733.pdf
title = Port and Maritime Security: Background and Issues for Congress
date = May 27, 2005
publisher = Congressional Research Service
author = Frittelli, John F. ] An
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD) study on the ownership and control of ships reports that anonymous ownership is more the rule than the exception. [cite web
url = http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/53/9/17846120.pdf
author = OECD Maritime Transport Committee
publisher = Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
title = Ownership and Control of Ships
date=March 2003] . There are reports that 15 cargo ships are linked to al-Qaeda. [cite web
url = http://www.cdi.org/friendlyversion/printversion.cfm?documentID=1644%20
date = August 20, 2003
publisher = Center for Defense Information
title =Al Qaeda's 'Navy' - How Much of a Threat?
author = Robinson, Colin] The reputed strongholds in Pakistan hardly will be bases for ships, and weak and failed states become the logical ports.
Bad health is a very real problem, especially from domestic conflict that displaces refugees across borders.
HIVis the most obvious, especially in Africa, but it is not the only major concern.citation
title = National Intelligence Estimate 99-17D: The Global Infectious Disease Threat and Its Implications for the United States
date = January 2000
url = http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/nie99-17d.htm]
Military health specialists, as distinct from special operations forces, can have an enormous impact. Training and equipping health and education facilities are key FID capabilities.
Organized transnational terrorists can flourish in weak states. A globally-oriented group using terrorist methods can coexist with a local insurgency, or perhaps in the country that offers sanctuary to a border-crossing insurgency in a neighboring state. Developed country terrorism programs can benefit from FID in weak states, by strengthening those states, with due regard to human rights and the rule of law. FID can complement the global war onterrorism by reducing these contributing factors. The defensive measures of anti-terrorism (AT) and offensive counterterrorism efforts can be part of the FID program developed for a HN.
In many cases, measures increasing the capacity of a state to fight terrorism alsowill strengthen its overall IDAD program. These measures can include the following::(a) Developing the ability of the HN to track illicit financial transactions, break funding streams for criminal and insurgent groups, and prosecute their members. This may involve greater USHN cooperation in developing regulated financial institutions. See
financial intelligence(FININT):(b) Ensuring that HN security personnel have access to appropriate equipment and training to conduct all phases of combating terrorism operations.:(c) Training personnel at entry and exit points (including airports, seaports, and border crossings) to identify and apprehend individuals and materials being used by international terrorist groups.:(d) Assisting HN security and intelligence agencies to be included into international networks that can share information on terrorist activities.:(e) Developing effective judicial systems, and minimizing corruption and intimidation of HN officials.citation
url = http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN016653.pdf
title = Afghanistan: Judicial Reform and Transitional Justice
date = 28 January 2003
volume = ICG Asia Report N°45
publisher = International Crisis Group]
FID specialists in
Information Operationscan help reduce the intensity of ethnic struggle. They have a range of techniques, from presenting things advantageous to all sides, to shutting down inflammatory propaganda outlets.
See the articles on
counter-insurgency, or, for U.S. doctrine and historical French and British methods, see foreign internal defense. Before one counters an insurgency, however, one must understand what one is countering. Typically the most successful counterinsurgencies have been the British in the Malay Emergency[ [Thomas Willis, "Lessons from the past: successful British counterinsurgency operations in Malaya 1948-1960", July-August 2005, Infantry Magazine] ] and the Filipino government's countering of the Huk Rebellion.
Unconventional warfare (United States Department of Defense doctrine)
Foreign internal defense
Global Islamic insurgency theory
List of revolutions and rebellions
Guerilla warfare, which needs to split, at least, into doctrines from China and Cuba
Foreign internal defense, which needs to split into French, U.K., and U.S. national doctrine
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
insurgency — in·sur·gen·cy /in sər jən sē/ n pl cies: the quality or state of being insurgent; specif: a condition of revolt against a recognized government that does not reach the proportions of an organized revolutionary government and is not recognized as… … Law dictionary
insurgency — 1803, from INSURGENT (Cf. insurgent) + CY (Cf. cy) … Etymology dictionary
insurgency — [in sʉr′jən sē] n. 1. the quality, state, or fact of being insurgent 2. INSURGENCE … English World dictionary
insurgency — UK [ɪnˈsɜː(r)dʒ(ə)nsɪ] / US [ɪnˈsɜrdʒənsɪ] noun [countable/uncountable] Word forms insurgency : singular insurgency plural insurgencies formal an attempt by a group of people to take control of their country by force … English dictionary
Insurgency — Insurgence In*sur gence, Insurgency In*sur gen*cy, n. A state of insurrection; an uprising; an insurrection. [1913 Webster] A moral insurgence in the minds of grave men against the Court of Rome. G. Eliot. [1913 Webster] … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
insurgency — noun /ɪnˈsɜː.dʒən.si,ɪnˈsɝ.dʒən.si/ rebellion; revolt; the state of being insurgent suppress the insurgency by isolating the rebels from the rest of the population … Wiktionary
insurgency — [[t]ɪnsɜ͟ː(r)ʤ(ə)nsi[/t]] insurgencies N VAR An insurgency is a violent attempt to oppose a country s government carried out by citizens of that country. [FORMAL] ... both countries were threatened with communist insurgencies in the 1960s. Syn:… … English dictionary
insurgency — sukilimas statusas T sritis Gynyba apibrėžtis Organizuotas judėjimas, kurio tikslas – nuversti esamą valdžią ardomąja veikla ir ginkluotais veiksmais. atitikmenys: angl. insurgency pranc. sédition … NATO terminų aiškinamasis žodynas
insurgency — insurgent ► ADJECTIVE ▪ rising in active revolt. ► NOUN ▪ a rebel or revolutionary. DERIVATIVES insurgence noun insurgency noun (pl. insurgencies) . ORIGIN from Latin insurgere rise up … English terms dictionary
insurgency — An organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict … Military dictionary