Dedekind cut

In mathematics, a Dedekind cut, named after Richard Dedekind, is a partition of the rationals into two nonempty parts A and B, such that all elements of A are less than all elements of B, and A contains no greatest element.
If B has a smallest element among the rationals, the cut corresponds to that rational. Otherwise, that cut defines a unique irrational number which, loosely speaking, fills the "gap" between A and B. In other words, A contains every rational number less than the cut, and B contains every rational number greater than the cut. An irrational cut is equated to an irrational number which is in neither set. Every real number, rational or not, is equated to one and only one cut of rationals.
Whenever, then, we have to do with a cut produced by no rational number, we create a new irrational number, which we regard as completely defined by this cut ... . From now on, therefore, to every definite cut there corresponds a definite rational or irrational number ....—Richard Dedekind, Continuity and Irrational Numbers, Section IVMore generally, a Dedekind cut is a partition of a totally ordered set into two nonempty parts, (A, B), such that A is closed downwards (meaning that for all a in A, x ≤ a implies that x is in A as well) and B is closed upwards, and A contains no greatest element. See also completeness (order theory).
In particular, as discussed below, we may consider Dedekind cuts among the real numbers defined as cuts among the rationals. It turns out that every cut of reals is identical to the cut produced by a specific real number (which can be identified as the smallest element of the B set). In other words, the number line where every real number is defined as a Dedekind cut of rationals is indeed a complete continuum without any further gaps!
Dedekind used the word cut (Schnitt) in a visual sense rooted in Euclidean geometry. When two straight lines cross, one is said to cut the other. Dedekind's construction of the number line ensures that two crossing lines always have one point in common because each of them defines a Dedekind cut on the other...
Contents
Representations
It is more symmetrical to use the (A,B) notation for Dedekind cuts, but each of A and B does determine the other. It can be a simplification, in terms of notation if nothing more, to concentrate on one 'half' — say, the lower one — and call any downward closed set A without greatest element a "Dedekind cut".
If the ordered set S is complete, then, for every Dedekind cut (A, B) of S, the set B must have a minimal element b, hence we must have that A is the interval ( −∞, b), and B the interval [b, +∞). In this case, we say that b is represented by the cut (A,B).
The important purpose of the Dedekind cut is to work with number sets that are not complete. The cut itself can represent a number not in the original collection of numbers (most often rational numbers). The cut can represent a number b, even though the numbers contained in the two sets A and B do not actually include the number b that their cut represents.
For example if A and B only contain rational numbers, they can still be cut at √2 by putting every negative rational number in A, along with every nonnegative number whose square is less than 2; similarly B would contain every positive rational number whose square is greater than or equal to 2. Even though there is no rational value for √2, if the rational numbers are partitioned into A and B this way, the partition itself represents an irrational number.
Ordering of cuts
Regard one Dedekind cut (A, B) as less than another Dedekind cut (C, D) if A is a proper subset of C. Equivalently, if D is a proper subset of B, the cut (A, B) is again less than (C, D). In this way, set inclusion can be used to represent the ordering of numbers, and all other relations (greater than, less than or equal to, equal to, and so on) can be similarly created from set relations.
The set of all Dedekind cuts is itself a linearly ordered set (of sets). Moreover, the set of Dedekind cuts has the leastupperbound property, i.e., every nonempty subset of it that has any upper bound has a least upper bound. Thus, constructing the set of Dedekind cuts serves the purpose of embedding the original ordered set S, which might not have had the leastupperbound property, within a (usually larger) linearly ordered set that does have this useful property.
Construction of the real numbers
A typical Dedekind cut of the rational numbers is given by
This cut represents the irrational number √2 in Dedekind's construction. To truly establish this, one must show that this really is a cut and that it is the square root of two. However, neither claim is immediate. Showing that it is a cut requires showing that for any positive rational with , there is a rational with and The choice works. Then we have a cut and it has a square no larger than 2, but to show equality requires showing that if is any rational number less than 2, then there is positive in A with .
Note that the equality b^{2} = 2 cannot hold since √2 is not rational.
Generalizations
A construction similar to Dedekind cuts is used for the construction of surreal numbers.
Partially ordered sets
Main article: Dedekind–MacNeille completionMore generally, if S is a partially ordered set, a completion of S means a complete lattice L with an orderembedding of S into L. The notion of complete lattice generalizes the leastupperbound property of the reals.
One completion of S is the set of its downwardly closed subsets, ordered by inclusion. A related completion that preserves all existing sups and infs of S is obtained by the following construction: For each subset A of S, let A^{u} denote the set of upper bounds of A, and let A^{l} denote the set of lower bounds of A. (These operators form a Galois connection.) Then the Dedekind–MacNeille completion of S consists of all subsets A for which (A^{u})^{l} = A; it is ordered by inclusion. The DedekindMacNeille completion is the smallest complete lattice with S embedded in it.
Allusions
In his chapter on Henri Bergson, the author C.E.M. Joad employed imagery that was similar to Dedekind's concept of the cut. Joad was trying to explain how Bergson saw the mind as an instrument that projected permanent objects onto the experience of constant change. "The intellect, then, is a purely practical faculty, which has evolved for the purposes of action. What it does is to take the ceaseless, living flow of which the universe is composed and to make cuts across it, inserting artificial stops or gaps in what is really a continuous and indivisible process. The effect of these stops or gaps is to produce the impression of a world of apparently solid objects. These have no existence as separate objects in reality; they are, as it were, the design or pattern which our intellects have impressed on reality to serve our purposes."^{[1]} This is reminiscent of Dedekind's creation of a new irrational number at every gap in the continuous number line at which there is no existing real number.^{[citation needed]}
See also
Notes
 ^ Great Philosophies of the World, C.E.M. Joad, Ch. VI, "The Philosophy of Change," 1930:Jonathan Cape and Harrison Smith, Inc.
References
 Dedekind, Richard, Essays on the Theory of Numbers, "Continuity and Irrational Numbers," Dover: New York, ISBN 0486210103. Also available at Project Gutenberg.
Categories:
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Dedekind cut — Math. two nonempty subsets of an ordered field, as the rational numbers, such that one subset is the collection of upper bounds of the second and the second is the collection of lower bounds of the first: can be used to define the real numbers in … Universalium
Dedekind cut — (or Dedekind section ) It has been known since the Greeks that there is no ratio of numbers, a/b, that is equal to the square root of 2. But there is no maximum ratio whose square is less than 2, and no minimum ratio whose square is greater than… … Philosophy dictionary
Dedekind cut — Math. two nonempty subsets of an ordered field, as the rational numbers, such that one subset is the collection of upper bounds of the second and the second is the collection of lower bounds of the first: can be used to define the real numbers in … Useful english dictionary
Cut — may refer to: The act of cutting, the separation of an object into two through acutely directed force Contents 1 Mathematics 2 Computing 3 … Wikipedia
Dedekind–MacNeille completion — The Hasse diagram of a partially ordered set (left) and its Dedekind–MacNeille completion (right). In order theoretic mathematics, the Dedekind–MacNeille completion of a partially ordered set (also called the completion by cuts or normal… … Wikipedia
Dedekind, Richard — ▪ German mathematician born Oct. 6, 1831, Braunschweig, duchy of Braunschweig [Germany] died Feb. 12, 1916, Braunschweig German mathematician who developed a major redefinition of irrational numbers (irrational number) in terms of arithmetic… … Universalium
Dedekind , (Julius Wilhelm) Richard — (1831–1916) German mathematician The son of an academic lawyer from Braunschweig, Germany, Dedekind was educated at the Caroline College there and at Göttingen, where he gained his doctorate in 1852. After four years spent teaching at Göttingen,… … Scientists
Richard Dedekind — Infobox Scientist name = PAGENAME box width = image size =180px caption =Richard Dedekind, c. 1850 birth date = October 6, 1831 birth place = Braunschweig death date = February 12, 1916 death place = Braunschweig residence = citizenship =… … Wikipedia
0.999... — In mathematics, the repeating decimal 0.999... (which may also be written as 0.9, , 0.(9), or as 0. followed by any number of 9s in the repeating decimal) denotes a real number that can be shown to be the number one. In other words, the symbols 0 … Wikipedia
Construction of the real numbers — In mathematics, there are several ways of defining the real number system as an ordered field. The synthetic approach gives a list of axioms for the real numbers as a complete ordered field. Under the usual axioms of set theory, one can show that … Wikipedia