Taxobox | name = "Australopithecus afarensis"
image_width = 220px
image_caption = Cast of the remains of "Lucy"
genus = "
species = "A. afarensis"
binomial = "Australopithecus afarensis"
binomial_authority = Johanson & White, 1978
"Australopithecus afarensis" is an extinct
hominidwhich lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago. In common with the younger " Australopithecus africanus", "A. afarensis" was slenderly built. From analysis it has been thought that "A. afarensis" was ancestral to both the genus " Australopithecus" and the genus "Homo", which includes the modern human species, " Homo sapiens".harvnb|Johanson|1981|p=283-297] Jones, S. Martin; & R. Pilbeam (ed.) (2004). "The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution" (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-46786-1] .
"Australopithecus afarensis" fossils have only been discovered within
eastern Africa. Despite Laetoli being the type locality for "A. afarensis", the most extensive remains assigned to this species are found in Hadar, Ethiopia, including the famous "Lucy" partial skeleton and the "First Family" found at the A.L. 333 locality. Other localities bearing "A. afarensis" remains include Omo, Maka, Fejej and Belohdelie in Ethiopia, and Koobi Foraand Lothagam in Kenya.
Craniodental features and Brain Size
Compared to the modern and extinct great
apes, "A. afarensis" has reduced canines and molars, although they are still relatively larger than in modern humans. "A. afarensis" also had a relatively small brain size (~380-430cm³) and a prognathic (i.e. projecting anteriorly) face.
The image of a
bipedal hominin with a small brain and primitive face was quite a revelation to the paleoanthropological world at the time. This was due to the earlier belief that an increase in brain size was the first major hominin adaptive shift. Before the discoveries of "A. afarensis" in the 1970s, it was widely thought that an increase in brain size preceded the shift to bipedal locomotion. This was mainly because the oldest known hominins at the time had relatively large brains (e.g KNM-ER 1470, Homo rudolfensis, which was found just a few years before Lucy and had a cranial capacity of ~800cm³).
There is considerable debate regarding the locomotor behaviour of "A. afarensis". Some believe that "A. afarensis" was almost exclusively bipedal, while others believe that the creatures were partly arboreal. The anatomy of the hands, feet and shoulder joints in many ways favour the latter interpretation. The curvature of the finger and toe bones (Phalanges) approaches that of modern-day apes, and is most likely reflective of their ability to efficiently grasp branches and climb. The presence of a wrist-locking mechanism might suggest that they were knuckle-walkers. The shoulder joint is also oriented more cranially (i.e. towards the skull) than in modern humans. Combined with the relatively long arms "A. afarensis" are thought to have had, this is thought by many to be reflective of a heightened ability to use the arm above the head in climbing behaviour. Furthermore, scans of the skulls reveal a canal and bony labyrinth morphology, which some suggest is not conducive to proper bipedal locomotion.However, there are also a number of traits in the "A. afarensis" skeleton which strongly reflect bipedalism. In overall anatomy, the pelvis is far more human-like than ape-like. The iliac blades are short and wide, the sacrum is wide and positioned directly behind the hip joint, and there is clear evidence of a strong attachment for the knee extensors. While the
pelvisis not wholly human-like (being markedly wide with flared with laterally orientated iliac blades), these features point to a structure that can be considered radically remodeled to accommodate a significant degree of bipedalismin the animals' locomotor repertoire. Importantly, the femuralso angles in toward the kneefrom the hip. This trait would have allowed the footto have fallen closer to the midline of the body, and is a strong indication of habitual bipedal locomotion. Along with humans, present day orangutans and spider monkeys possess this same feature. The feet also feature adductedbig toes, making it difficult if not impossible to grasp branches with the hindlimbs. The loss of a grasping hindlimb also increases the risk of an infant being dropped or falling, as primates typically hold onto their mothers while the mother goes about her daily business. Without the second set of grasping limbs, the infant cannot maintain as strong a grip, and likely had to be held with help from the mother. The problem of holding the infant would be multiplied if the mother also had to climb trees. The anklejoint of "A. afarensis" is also markedly human-like.Fact|date=February 2007Computer simulations using dynamic modelling of the skeleton's inertial properties and kinematicshave indicated that "A. afarensis" was able to walk in the same way modern humans walk, with a normal erect gait or with bent hips and knees, but could not walk in the same way as chimpanzees. The upright gait would have been much more efficient than the bent knee and hip walking, which would have taken twice as much energy.cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/prehistoric_life/human/human_evolution/mother_of_man1.shtml |title=BBC - Science & Nature - The evolution of man |accessdate=2007-11-01 |work=Mother of man - 3.2 million years ago ] [cite web |url=http://www.liv.ac.uk/premog/premog-research.htm#backevidence |title=PREMOG - Research |accessdate=2007-11-01 |date= 18 May 2007|work=How Lucy walked |publisher=Primate Evolution & Morphology Group (PREMOG), the Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, the School of Biomedical Sciences at the University of Liverpool] It appears probable that "A. afarensis" was quite an efficient bipedal walker over short distances, and the spacing of the footprints at Laetoliindicates that they were walking at 1.0 m/s or above, which matches human small-town walking speeds. [cite web |url=http://www.liv.ac.uk/premog/premog-sup-info-Laetoli.htm |title=PREMOG - Supplementry Info |accessdate=2007-11-01 |date= 18 May 2007|work=The Laetoli Footprint Trail: 3D reconstruction from texture; archiving, and reverse engineering of early hominin gait |publisher=Primate Evolution & Morphology Group (PREMOG), the Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, the School of Biomedical Sciences at the University of Liverpool]
It is commonly thought that upright bipedal walking evolved from knuckle-walking with bent legs, in the manner used by chimpanzees and
gorillas to move around on the ground, but fossils such as Orrorin tugenensisindicate bipedalism around 5 to 8 million years ago, in the same general period where genetic studies suggest the lineage of chimpanzees and humans diverged. Modern apes and their fossil ancestors show skeletal adaptations to an upright posture used in tree climbing, and it has been proposed that that upright, straight-legged walking originally evolved as an adaptation to tree-dwelling. Studies of modern orangutans in Sumatrahave shown these apes using four legs when walking on large stable branches and when swinging underneath slightly smaller branches, but are bipedal and maintain their legs very straight when using multiple small flexible branches under 4 cm. in diameter while also using their arms for balance and additional support. This enables them to get nearer to the edge of the tree canopy to grasp fruit or cross to another tree.
Climate changes around 11 to 12 million years ago affected forests in East and Central Africa, establishing periods where openings prevented travel through the tree canopy, and during these times ancestral hominids could have adapted the upright walking behaviour for ground travel, while the ancestors of gorillas and chimpanzees became more specialised in climbing vertical tree trunks or lianas with a bent hip and bent knee posture, ultimately leading them to use the related knuckle-walking posture for ground travel. This would lead to "A. afarensis" usage of upright bipedalism for ground travel, while still having arms well adapted for climbing smaller trees. However, chimpanzees and gorillas are the closest living relatives to humans, and share anatomical features including a fused wrist bone which may also suggest knuckle-walking by human ancestors. [cite web |url=http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,2093002,00.html |title=New theory rejects popular view of man's evolution - Research - EducationGuardian.co.uk |accessdate=2007-11-05 |author=Ian Sample, science correspondent |date=June 1, 2007 ] [cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6709627.stm |title=BBC NEWS - Science/Nature - Upright walking 'began in trees' |accessdate=2007-11-05 |date=31 May 2007 ] [cite web |url=http://www.liv.ac.uk/premog/premog-sup-info-SCIENCE.htm |title=PREMOG - Supplementry Info |accessdate=2007-11-01 |author= Thorpe S.K.S.|authorlink= |coauthors=Holder R.L., and Crompton R.H. |date=
24 May 2007|work=Origin of Human Bipedalism As an Adaptation for Locomotion on Flexible Branches |publisher=Primate Evolution & Morphology Group (PREMOG), the Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, the School of Biomedical Sciences at the University of Liverpool] Other studies suggest that an upright spine and a primarily vertical body plan in primates dates back to " Morotopithecus bishopi" in the Early Mioceneof 21.6 million years ago [cite web |url=http://blog.oup.com/2007/12/human/#more-1425 |title=Redefining the word “Human” – Do Some Apes Have Human Ancestors? : OUPblog |accessdate=2007-12-27 |author=Aaron G. Filler |date=December 24, 2007 ] [cite web |url=http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0001019 |title=PLoS ONE: Homeotic Evolution in the Mammalia: Diversification of Therian Axial Seriation and the Morphogenetic Basis of Human Origins |accessdate=2007-12-27 |author=Aaron G. Filler |date=October 10, 2007 ]
It is difficult to predict the social behaviour of extinct fossil species. However, the social structure of modern apes and monkeys can be anticipated to some extent by the average range of body size between males and females (known as
sexual dimorphism). Although there is considerable debate over how large the degree of sexual dimorphism was between males and females of "A. afarensis", it is likely that males were relatively larger than females. If observations on the relationship between sexual dimorphism and social group structure from modern great apes are applied to "A. afarensis" then these creatures most likely lived in small family groups containing a single dominant male and a number of breeding females.
Donald Johansonand his colleague Tim White carried out detailed morphological studies on their finds to date, including both Lucy and the "First Family" fossils. They compared the fossils to chimpanzee, gorillaand modern human specimens, and casts of extinct hominidfossils, with particular attention to jaws and dental arcades, and found that their fossils were somewhere between humans and apes, possibly closer to apes, though with essentially human bodies. They reached the conclusion that it could not be classified in the genus "Homo" and should be in the genus " Australopithecus" as the new species "Australopithecus afarensis". They believed that this extinct hominidwould prove to be ancestral to " Australopithecus africanus" and " Australopithecus robustus" as well as to the genus "Homo" which includes the modern human species, " Homo sapiens", [harvnb|Johanson|1981|p=265-266, 278-279, 283-297] and this conclusion was widely accepted.Jones, S. Martin; & R. Pilbeam (ed.) (2004). "The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution" (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-46786-1] However, in 2006 scientists Yoel Rak, Avishag Ginzburg, and Eli Geffen carried out a morphological analysis which found that the mandibular ramus (jawbone) of "australopithecus afarensis" specimen A. L. 822-1 discovered in 2002 closely matches that of a gorilla, and from further studies they concluded that "australopithecus afarensis" is more likely a member of the robust australopithecinesbranch of the hominid evolutionary tree and so not a direct ancestor of man. They concluded that "Ardipithecus ramidus" discovered by White and colleagues in the 1990s is a more likely ancestor of the human clade.cite web |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/16/6568 |title=From the Cover: Gorilla-like anatomy on Australopithecus afarensis mandibles suggests Au. afarensis link to robust australopiths -- Rak et al. 104 (16): 6568 -- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |accessdate=2007-10-19 |author=Yoel Rak |authorlink= |coauthors=Avishag Ginzburg and Eli Geffen |date=April 17, 2007 ] [cite web |url=http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0606454104/DC1 |title=From the Cover: Gorilla-like anatomy on Australopithecus afarensis mandibles suggests Au. afarensis link to robust australopiths -- Rak et al. 104 (16): 6568 Data Supplement - HTML Page - index.htslp -- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |accessdate=2007-10-19 |author=Yoel Rak |authorlink= |coauthors=Avishag Ginzburg and Eli Geffen |date=April 17, 2007 ]
The type specimen for "A. afarensis" is
LH 4, an adult mandible from the site of Laetoli, Tanzania.
The first "A. afarensis" knee joint was discovered in November 1973 by
Donald Johansonas part of a team involving Maurice Taieb, Yves Coppensand Tim White in the Middle Awashof Ethiopia's Afar Depression.
The first "A. afarensis"
skeletonwas discovered on November 24, 1974near Hadar in Ethiopia by Tom Gray in the company of Donald Johanson, as part of a team involving Maurice Taieb, Yves Coppensand Tim White in the Middle Awashof Ethiopia's Afar Depression.
Michael Bush, one of Don Johanson's students, made another major discovery in 1975: near Lucy, on the other side of the hill, he found the "First Family", including 200 fragments of "A. afarensis". The site of the findings is now known as "site 333", by a count of fossil fragments uncovered, such as teeth and pieces of jaw. 13 individuals were uncovered and all were adults, with no injuries caused by carnivores. All 13 individuals seemed to have died at the same time, thus Johanson concluded that they might have been killed instantly from a flash flood.
September 20 2006, " Scientific American" magazine presented the findings of a dig in Dikika, Ethiopia, a few miles from the place where Lucy was found. The recovered skeleton of a 3-year-old "A. afarensis" girl comprises almost the entire skull and torso, and most parts of the limbs. The features of the skeleton suggest adaptation to walking upright ( bipedalism) as well as tree-climbing, features that match the skeletal features of Lucy and fall midway between human and humanoid ape anatomy. "Baby Lucy" has officially been named "Selam" (meaning "peace" in most Ethiopian languages). [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=00076C1D-62D1-1511-A2D183414B7F0000]
Further findings at Afar, including the many hominin bones in "site 333", produced more bones of concurrent date, and led to Johanson and White's eventual argument that the Koobi Fora hominins were concurrent with the Afar hominins. In other words, Lucy was not unique in evolving bipedalism and a flat face.
Recently, an entirely new species has been discovered, called "
Kenyanthropus platyops", however the cranium KNM WT 40000has a much distorted matrix making it hard to distinguish (however a flat face is present). This had many of the same characteristics as Lucy, but is possibly an entirely different genus.
Another species, called "Ardipithecus ramidus", was found by White and colleagues in the 1990s. This was fully bipedal, yet appears to have been contemporaneous with a woodland environment, and, more importantly, contemporaneous with "Australopithecus afarensis". Scientists have not yet been able to draw an estimation of the
cranial capacityof "Ar. ramidus" as only small jaw and leg fragments have been discovered thus far.
List of human fossils
List of fossil sites"(with link directory)"
* List of hominina (hominid) fossils "(with images)"
BBC- "Dawn of Man" (2000) by Robin Mckie| ISBN 0-7894-6262-1
*cite book|title = Atlas of World History|author=Barraclough, G.|edition = 3rd edition|editor=Stone, N. (ed.)|year=1989|publisher=Times Books Limited|id=ISBN 0-7230-0304-1
* [http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/ha/afar.html Australopithecus afarensis] from "The Human Origins Program at the
*cite book|title = Encyclopedia of human evolution and prehistory|edition = 2nd Edition|editor= Delson, E., I. Tattersall, J.A. Van Couvering & A.S. Brooks (eds.)|year=2000|publisher= Garland Publishing, New York|id=ISBN 0-8153-1696-8
* [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7086/abs/nature04629.html Asa Issie, Aramis and the origin of Australopithecus]
* [http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/atapuerca/africa/lucy.php Lucy at the American Museum of Natural History in Manhattan]
* [http://www.asu.edu/clas/iho/lucy.html Lucy at the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University]
* [http://www.geocities.com/palaeoanthropology/Aafarensis.html Asfarensis]
* [http://www.somso.de/english/anatomie/stammesgeschichte.htm Anthropological skulls and reconstructions]
* [http://www.becominghuman.org/ Becoming Human: Paleoanthropology, Evolution and Human Origins]
* [http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/dikikababy/ "National Geographic" "Dikika baby"]
* [http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/biology/humanevolution/afarensis.html MNSU]
* [http://www.archaeologyinfo.com/australopithecusafarensis.htm Archaeology Info]
* [http://www.mnh.si.edu/anthro/humanorigins/ha/afar.html Smithsonian]
* [http://www.wsu.edu/gened/learn-modules/top_longfor/timeline/afarensis/afarensis-a.html Washington State University : Australopithicus afarensis: The story of Lucy]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Australopithecus afarensis — Nachbildung des Skeletts von Lucy im Museo Nacional de Antropología in Mexiko Stadt Zeitraum Pliozän 3,8 bis 2,9 Mio. Jahre … Deutsch Wikipedia
Australopithecus Afarensis — Australopithecus afarensis … Wikipédia en Français
Australopithecus afarensis — Australopithecus afarensis … Wikipédia en Français
Australopithecus afarensis — Australopithecus afarensis Rango temporal: Plioceno … Wikipedia Español
Australopithecus afarensis — La historia de esta especie de Australopithecus se remonta a 3.2 millones de años, pero su descubrimiento data de 1974 por Donald Johanson en Hadar, Etiopía. Este descubrimiento arrojo los restos de el Australopithecus mundialmente conocido como… … Enciclopedia Universal
Australopithecus afarensis — noun fossils found in Ethiopia; from 3.5 to 4 million years ago • Hypernyms: ↑australopithecine • Instance Hyponyms: ↑Lucy • Member Holonyms: ↑genus Australopithecus, ↑Australopithecus * * * /euh fah ren sis/ … Useful english dictionary
Australopithecus afarensis — … Википедия
Australopithecus afarensis — /euh fah ren sis/ 1. an extinct species of early hominid whose fossil remains were discovered in Ethiopia and have been dated at between 3.5 and 4 million years of age. 2. a fossil belonging to this species. Cf. Lucy. See illus. under hominid.… … Universalium
Australopithecus — sediba, Kopf des Holotypus (Original) Zeitraum Pliozän 4,2 bis 2 Mio. Jahre Fundorte … Deutsch Wikipedia
Australopithecus Africanus — Australopithecus africanus … Wikipédia en Français