civil procedure, the work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigationfrom discovery by opposing counsel. [cite encyclopedia |editor=Bryan G. Gardner |title=Work-product rule |encyclopedia=Black's Law Dictionary |edition=Abridged 7th ed. |publisher=West Group |location=St. Paul, Minn. |date=2000 |page=1298] It is also known as the work-product rule, the work-product immunity, the work-product privilege (somewhat erroneous terminology), and the work-product exception.
Under the work-product doctrine, "tangible material or its intangible equivalent" that is collected or prepared in anticipation of litigation is not discoverable, [cite encyclopedia |title=Work product |encyclopedia=Black's Law Dictionary |page=1298] and may be shielded from discovery by a Protective Order, unless the party seeking discovery can demonstrate that the sought facts can only be obtained through discovery and that those facts are indispensable for impeaching or substantiating a claim."
Hickman v. Taylor".] That is, the party unable to obtain the information has no other means of obtaining the information without "undue hardship". For example, the witness may have left the country. Where the required showing is made, the court will still protect mental impressions of an attorney by redacting that part of the document containing the mental impressions.
Comparison with attorney-client privilege
The work-product doctrine is more inclusive than
attorney-client privilege. Unlike the attorney-client privilege, which includes only communications between an attorney and his client, work-product includes materials prepared by persons other than the attorney himself: The materials may have been prepared by anybody as long as they were prepared with an eye towards the realistic possibility of impending litigation. Additionally, it includes materials collected for the attorney such as interrogatories, signed statements, other information acquired for the prosecution or defense of a case, "memoranda, briefs, communications . . . other writings prepared by counsel for his own use in prosecuting his client's case . . . mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories."
However, the work-product doctrine is also less powerful than the attorney-client privilege because it is not a "privilege", and therefore may be overcome by a showing of necessity, as described above.
The work-product doctrine originated in the 1947 case of "
Hickman v. Taylor", in which the Supreme Court affirmed a United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuitdecision which excluded from discovery of oral and written statements made by witnesses to a defendant's attorney. The Supreme Court, acting at the recommendation of the Advisory Committee of the Judicial Conference, later enshrined this doctrine formally in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedureas Rule 26(b)(3). ["Certain of the Amendments of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 1970, Effective July 1, 1970, With Advisory Committee's Notes Thereon." Reprinted in cite book |title=Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Selected Other Procedural Provisions |editor=Kevin M. Clermont |publisher=Foundation Press |date=2006 |location=New York]
* [http://library.findlaw.com/1998/May/1/130443.html Expanding Scope of Attorney-Work-Product Doctrine: United States v. Aldman]
* [http://www.lectlaw.com/files/lit16.htm Protection From Discovery—A Little About Work-Product, Attorney-Client And Common-Interest Privileges]
* [http://legalwikipro.com/wiki/index.php?title=Discovery_(OK) Article on Work Product Doctrine at LegalWikiPro.com]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
work product doctrine — n: a doctrine or rule that protects an attorney s work product from discovery – called also work product rule; ◇ This doctrine applies to work product of all kinds, but it may be waived for certain materials (as documents) if the party seeking… … Law dictionary
work-product doctrine — The principle that material collected and prepared for a case by counsel is not subject to disclosure by way of discovery at the instance of the party adverse to counsel s client. 23 Am J2d Dep § 195 … Ballentine's law dictionary
work product rule — n. A rule protecting work product from discovery. The Essential Law Dictionary. Sphinx Publishing, An imprint of Sourcebooks, Inc. Amy Hackney Blackwell. 2008. work product rule A legal doctrine that provides tha … Law dictionary
Work for hire — A work made for hire (sometimes abbreviated as work for hire or WFH) is an exception to the general rule that the person who actually creates a work is the legally recognized author of that work. According to copyright law in the United States… … Wikipedia
First-sale doctrine — This article is about the first sale doctrine as applied to copyright. For the analogous first sale doctrine applicable to patents, see Exhaustion doctrine. The first sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme… … Wikipedia
Derivative work — L.H.O.O.Q. (1919). Derivative work by Marcel Duchamp based on the Mona Lisa (La Gioconda) by Leonardo da Vinci. Also known as The Mona Lisa With a Moustache. Often used by law professors to illustrate legal concept of derivative work. In United… … Wikipedia
Castle doctrine — A Castle Doctrine (also known as a Castle Law or a Defense of Habitation Law) is an American legal doctrine arising from English common law that designates one s place of residence (or, in some states, any place legally occupied, such as one s … Wikipedia
Functionality doctrine — Intellectual property law Primary rights Copyright · authors rights … Wikipedia
Mask work — A mask work is a two or three dimensional layout or topography of an integrated circuit (IC or chip ), i.e. the arrangement on a chip of semiconductor devices such as transistors and passive electronic components such as resistors and… … Wikipedia
Illinois Brick doctrine — The Illinois Brick doctrine (or Doctrine of the Illinois Brick case) is a rule of United States antitrust law that prohibits indirect purchasers of goods or services from recovering antitrust damages from antitrust violators. Thus, if… … Wikipedia