- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
:"This article is about the "
look and feel" copyright lawsuit between Apple Inc.(formerly Apple Computer, Inc.) and Microsoft Corporation. There have been other lawsuits between the two companies."
"Apple Computer Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation", 35 F.3d 1435 (
9th Cir.1994) was a copyright infringementlawsuit in which Apple Computer, Inc. (now Apple Inc.) sought to prevent Microsoft Corporationand Hewlett-Packardfrom using visual graphical user interface(GUI) elements that were similar to those in Apple's Lisa and Macintosh operating systems. Some critics claimed that Apple was really attempting to gain all intellectual propertyrights over the desktop metaphorfor computer interfaces, and perhaps all GUIs, on personal computers. Apple lost all claims in the lawsuit, except that the court ruled that the "trash can" icon and file folder icons from Hewlett-Packard's now-forgotten NewWave windows application were infringing. The lawsuit was filed in 1988 and lasted four years; the decision was affirmed on appeal in 1994, [http://home.earthlink.net/~mjohnsen/Technology/Lawsuits/appvsms.html] and Apple's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Courtwas denied.
Apple had previously agreed to license certain parts of its GUI to Microsoft for use in
Windows 1.0. When Microsoft made changes in Windows 2.0, such as overlapping windows and other more Macintosh-like GUI features, Apple filed suit, and then added additional claims to the suit when Microsoft released Windows 3.0.
Apple claimed the "
look and feel" of the Macintosh operating system, taken as a whole, was protected by copyright, and that each individual element of the interface (such as the existence of windows on the screen, the fact that they are rectangular, are resizable, overlap, and have title bars) was not as important as all these elements taken together. After long arguments, the judge insisted on an analysis of specific GUI elements that Apple claimed were infringements. Apple came up with a list of 189 GUI elements; the judge decided that 179 of these elements had been licensed to Microsoft in the Windows 1.0 agreement, and most of the remaining 10 elements were not copyrightable—either they were unoriginal to Apple, or they were the only possible way of expressing a particular idea.
In a twist midway through the suit,
Xeroxfiled a lawsuit against Apple, claiming Apple had infringed copyrights Xerox held on "its" GUIs. Xerox had invested in Apple and had invited the Macintosh design team to view their GUI computers at the PARCresearch lab; these visits had been very influential on the development of the Macintosh GUI. Xerox's lawsuit appeared to be a defensive move to ensure that if "Apple v. Microsoft" established that "look and feel" was copyrightable, then Xerox would be the primary beneficiary, rather than Apple. The Xerox case was dismissed because the three year statute of limitationshad passed.
The court based most of its ruling on the original licensing agreement between Apple and Microsoft for Windows 1.0. This made the case more of a contractual matter than one of copyright law, much against Apple's intentions. This also meant that the court could avoid a far-reaching "look and feel copyright" precedent ruling.
In 1997, five years after the lawsuit was decided, all lingering infringement questions against Microsoft regarding the Lisa and Macintosh GUI as well as Apple's "QuickTime piracy" lawsuit against Microsoft were settled in direct negotiations.Apple agreed to make Internet Explorer their default browser, to the detriment of
Netscape. Microsoft agreed to continue developing their Office and other software for the Mac for the next five years. Microsoft also purchased $150 million of non-voting Apple stock, helping Apple in its financial struggles at the time. Both parties entered into a patent cross-licensing agreement. [Kawamoto, Dawn; Heskett, Ben; Ricciuti, Mike. [http://news.com.com/MS+to+invest+150+million+in+Apple/2100-1001_3-202143.html "MS to invest $150 million in Apple"] , CNET News, August 6, 1997] [ [http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/agreements/apple/microsoft.1997.08.05.html "Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement"] , FindLaw, August 5, 1997]
In recent years Apple has resumed threats of litigation in this area. One target has been
Stardock, whose CEO Brad Wardellonce joked that Apple's lawyers had him on speed-dial.Fact|date=August 2008 Apple was not pleased when skins and themes for WindowBlinds, IconPackagerand DesktopX, looking similar to their Aqua GUI, were released in mid-2000, that is, over six months before the release of Mac OS X.
Apple Inc. litigation
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Apple Computer, Inc. — Apple Inc. Unternehmensform Incorporated ISIN … Deutsch Wikipedia
Apple Computer Inc. — Apple Inc. Unternehmensform Incorporated ISIN … Deutsch Wikipedia
Apple Computer — Apple Inc. Pour les articles homonymes, voir Apple (homonymie). Apple Inc. Logo d Apple Inc … Wikipédia en Français
Apple Computer Incorporated — Apple Inc. Pour les articles homonymes, voir Apple (homonymie). Apple Inc. Logo d Apple Inc … Wikipédia en Français
Apple-Computer — Apple Inc. Unternehmensform Incorporated ISIN … Deutsch Wikipedia
Apple Computer — Apple Inc. Unternehmensform Incorporated ISIN … Deutsch Wikipedia
Microsoft Corporation — Unternehmensform Kapitalgesellschaft ISIN … Deutsch Wikipedia
Microsoft Corporation — Microsoft Logo de Microsoft Création 4 avril 1975 à Albuquerque Dates clés … Wikipédia en Français
Microsoft Corporation — ▪ American company leading developer of personal computer software systems and applications. The company also publishes books and multimedia titles, offers e mail services, and sells electronic game systems, computer peripherals (input/output… … Universalium
List of assets owned by Microsoft Corporation — Microsoft has interest in the following areas:Trademarks* Microsoft * Windows including Windows XP, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows Vista * Microsoft Disk Operating System (MS DOS) * DirectX Windows library for audio, user input, and 2D/3D… … Wikipedia