Rational ignorance

Rational ignorance

Rational ignorance is a term most often found in economics, particularly public choice theory, but also used in other disciplines which study rationality and choice, including philosophy (epistemology) and game theory.

Ignorance about an issue is said to be "rational" when the cost of educating oneself about the issue sufficiently to make an informed decision can outweigh any potential benefit one could reasonably expect to gain from that decision, and so it would be irrational to waste time doing so. This has consequences for the quality of decisions made by large numbers of people, such as general elections, where the probability of any one vote changing the outcome is very small.


Consider an employer attempting to choose between two candidates offering to complete a task at the cost of $10 / hour. The length of time needed to complete the task may be longer or shorter depending on the skill of the person performing the task, so it is in the employer's best interests to find the fastest worker possible. Assume that the cost of another day of interviewing the candidates is $100. If the employer had deduced from the interviews so far that both candidates would complete the task in somewhere between 195 and 205 hours, it would be in the employer's best interests to choose one or the other by some easily-applied metric (for example, flipping a coin) rather than spend the $100 on determining the better candidate, saving at most $100 in labor.


Marketers can take advantage of rational ignorance by increasing the complexity of a decision. If the difference in value between a quality product and a poor product is less than the cost to perform the research necessary to differentiate between them, then it is more rational for a consumer to just take his chances on whichever of the two is more convenient and available. Thus, it is in the interest of the producer of a lower value product to proliferate features, options, and package combinations until the average shopper finds it too much trouble to make an informed decision.

This also works for politics. By increasing the number of issues that a person needs to consider in order to make a rational decision between candidates, they can level the playing field by encouraging single-issue voting, party-line voting, and other habits that tend to ignore a candidate's actual qualifications for the job.

Another, more nuanced, political application involves a voter's identification with a political party, much like the adoption of a favorite movie critic. Based on prior experience a reasonably responsible voter will find politicians or a political party that will draw conclusions similar to their own conclusions when the voter had the time to do the analysis. This is just like the way we adopt a movie critic that likes movies that we like. In this way we let the political party, the politician, or the movie critic do the research and make the decision for us.


Much of the empirical support for the idea of rational ignorance was drawn from studies of voter apathy, which reached particularly strong conclusions in the 1950s. [Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. and Stokes. D. (1960), 'The American Voter', Wiley, N.Y.] However, apathy appeared to decline sharply in the 1960s as concern about issues such as the Vietnam War mounted , and political polarization increased [Nie, N., Verba, S. and Petrocik, J. (1976), 'The Changing American Voter', Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.] . This suggests that voters' interest in political information increases with the importance of political choices.

Additionally, rational ignorance is scrutinized for its broadening effect on the decisions that individuals make in different matters. The investment of time and energy on the specified subject has ramifications on other decision areas. Individuals sometimes forget to take this into account when unconsciously assessing the investment cost versus payout. The external benefits are therefore not adequately taken into account.


ee also

* bounded rationality
* satisficing
* categorical imperative

External links

* [http://www.strom.clemson.edu/teams/ced/econ/8-3No29.pdf The Theory of Rational Ignorance]
* [http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/ratirnew.doc Rational Ignorance vs. Rational Irrationality]
* [http://www.jstor.org/view/00129682/di952648/95p0129t/0 Rational Behavior Under Complete Ignorance] (account needed)
* [http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://bbs.cenet.org.cn/uploadImages/200332715474972903.pdf Rational Irrationality: Some Economics of Self-Management]
* [http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.02.005 Would Rational Voters Acquire Costly Information?]
* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00182-006-0051-4 Rational Ignorance and Voting Behavior]

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Ignorance (disambiguation) — Ignorance is a state of being uninformed. Ignorance may also refer to: In social sciences: Pluralistic ignorance, a concept in social psychology Rational ignorance, a concept in epistemology Vincible ignorance, a moral or doctrinal matter in… …   Wikipedia

  • Ignorance — The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed* Avijja, ignorance as a concept in Buddhism * Ignorance (album), a Sacred Reich album * Ignorance (band), a thrash funk metal band * Ignorance (novel), a Czech novel * Pluralistic… …   Wikipedia

  • Rational choice theory — This article is about a theory of economics. For Rational Choice Theory as applied to criminology, see Rational choice theory (criminology). Economics …   Wikipedia

  • Rational expectations — is an assumption used in many contemporary macroeconomic models, and also in other areas of contemporary economics and game theory and in other applications of rational choice theory. Since most macroeconomic models today study decisions over… …   Wikipedia

  • Ignorance —    1) Knowledge Is Finite, Ignorance Infinite    The more we learn about the world, and the deeper our learning, the more conscious, specific, and articulate will be our knowledge of what we do not know, our knowledge of our ignorance. For this,… …   Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science

  • Public choice theory — Public choice in economic theory is the use of modern economic tools to study problems that are traditionally in the province of political science. (A more general term is political economy , an earlier name for economics that evokes its… …   Wikipedia

  • Рациональное невежество — Рациональное невежество  термин, часто используемый в экономике, иногда  в теории публичного выбора, и, кроме того, в других дисциплинах, изучающих рациональность и выбор, включая философию (эпистемиологию) и теорию игр. Невежество в… …   Википедия

  • Bryan Caplan — (* 8. April 1971) ist ein US amerikanischer Ökonom. Er ist Professor am Department für Wirtschaftswissenschaften der George Mason University in Fairfax (Virginia) und freier wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Cato Institute. Er ist vor allem… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Decision theory — in economics, psychology, philosophy, mathematics, and statistics is concerned with identifying the values, uncertainties and other issues relevant in a given decision, its rationality, and the resulting optimal decision. It is closely related to …   Wikipedia

  • Bounded rationality — Some models of human behavior in the social sciences assume that humans can be reasonably approximated or described as rational entities (see for example rational choice theory). Many economics models assume that people are hyperrational, and… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.