Instrumental rationality

Instrumental rationality

Two views of instrumental rationality can be discerned in modern philosophy: one view comes from social philosophy and critical theory, another comes from natural philosophy.

The view from critical theory and social philosophy

In social and critical theory, instrumental rationality is often seen as a specific form of rationality focusing on the most efficient or cost-effective means to achieve a specific end, but not in itself reflecting on the value of that end. Thus, to the extent that rationality is concerned with critically evaluating actions, instrumental rationality tends to focus on the 'hows' of an action, rather than its 'whys'.

More specifically, instrumental rationality can be contrasted with forms of rationality concerned with (a) promoting human understanding on a more general level, or (b) with improving the human condition. Thus, Jürgen Habermas, in his early philosophy of science (such as his book 'Technik und Wissenschaft als „Ideologie“' from 1968), distinguished between three different forms of "knowledge interests" ('Erkenntnisinteressen') that were constitutive of three forms of the scientific enterprise, namely (a) the interest in understanding, constitutive of the humanities; (b) the interest in critical questioning forms of oppression, ideally constitutive of social sciences, and finally, (c) the interest in understanding the necessities of nature and the potential for technically harnessing natural laws, and manipulating living and dead nature, constitutive of the natural sciences. The later is an expression of instrumental rationality.

However, to a large extent, the social sciences, such as economics, are also investigating how the laws of economy constrain human action and how to manipulate those laws or conditions. Thus, we find in economics many expressions of instrumental rationality. Instrumentally rational agents take the course of action which will optimally achieve their desired ends in any situation, the choice of ends being given. It is distinguished from philosophies that propose to use reason to prescribe the ultimate goals. Instrumental rationality uses reason only as a tool to reach the goals, not to say which goals are right.

Proponents of instrumental reason counter that reason in and of itself cannot reach a conclusion on ultimate goals, using arguments of the type originated by David Hume, and that those who say it can are attempting to force a political decision by a more elaborate form of begging the question. Historically, French philosophy from the eighteenth century has generally been opposed to this concept while British philosophy has often accepted it.

Varieties of instrumental rationality include descriptive instrumental rationality (DIR), which says agents behave as instrumental rationalists as a matter of fact; descriptive selfish instrumental rationality, which extends DIR to say that agents pursue selfish ends (e.g., financial gain, pleasure); and prescriptive instrumental rationality, which claims agents ought to pursue their ends as instrumental rationalists.

The view from natural philosophy

In natural philosophy instrumental rationality is the combination of mathematical reasoning with physical instruments in scientific and social inquiry. An ammeter is such an instrument; it combines the physical phenomena of electromagnetism with the geometric rationality of trigonometry. In this tradition, "instrumental rationality" is often simply called "instrumentation" and understood as the art and science of measurement and control, which gives it formal connections with the sciences of cybernetics and data acquisition.

See also

* Rationality
* David Hume
* Instrumental action
* Instrumentalism
* Homo economicus

External links

* [ The Limits of Instrumental Rationality in Social Explanation] by Doug Mann

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • instrumental rationality — noun A specific form of rationality focusing on the most efficient or cost effective means to achieve a specific end, but not in itself reflecting on the value of that end …   Wiktionary

  • Rationality — as a term is related to the idea of reason, a word which following Webster s may be derived as much from older terms referring to thinking itself as from giving an account or an explanation. This lends the term a dual aspect. One aspect… …   Wikipedia

  • Instrumental action — (also known as goal instrumental action, zweckrational ) is a social action pursued after evaluating its consequences and consideration of the various means to achieve it. They are usually planned and taken after considering costs and… …   Wikipedia

  • The Nature of Rationality — is an exploration of practical rationality written by Robert Nozick and published in 1993. It views human rationality as an evolutionary adaptation. Its delimited purpose and function may be responsible for biases and blind spots, possibly… …   Wikipedia

  • Communicative rationality — Communicative rationality, or communicative reason, is a theory or set of theories which describes human rationality as a necessary outcome of successful communication. In particular, it is tied to the philosophy of Karl Otto Apel, Jürgen… …   Wikipedia

  • ИНСТРУМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ РАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЬ или ИНСТРУМЕНТАЛЬНЫЙ РАЗУМ — (INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY or INSTRUMENTAL REASON) Термин, заимствованный представителями Франкфуртской школы у М. Вебера для обозначения использования технически наиболее эффективных и рациональных средств (инструментов) для достижения желаемой… …   Социологический словарь

  • ИНСТРУМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ РАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЬ — (instrumental rationality) подчинение деятельности критерию одной лишь эффективности (Гелнер, 1988). Эта форма часто расценивается как сущность процесса рационализации, лежащего в основе преобразования досовременных, доиндустриальных обществ в… …   Большой толковый социологический словарь

  • Critical theory — Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas David Rasmussen HEGEL, MARX AND THE IDEA OF A CRITICAL THEORY Critical theory1 is a metaphor for a certain kind of theoretical orientation which owes its origin to Hegel and Marx, its systematization to Horkheimer and …   History of philosophy

  • Egalitarian dialogue — is a form of discussion that takes place when different contributions are considered in terms of the validity of the arguments, rather than assessing them according to the power positions of those who advocate them.Principles and… …   Wikipedia

  • Jürgen Habermas — Infobox Philosopher region = Western Philosophy era = 20th century color = #B0C4DE name = Jürgen Habermas birth = birth date and age|1929|6|18 school tradition = Critical theory main interests = Social Theory· Epistemology Political theory·… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.