An earthquake prediction is a
predictionthat an earthquakein a specific magnitude range will occur in a specific region and time window. Predictions are considered as such to the extent that they are reliable for practical, as well as scientific, purposes. Although there is evidence that at least some earthquakes in some tectonic regimes are predictable with useful accuracy of time and space, the reliability and reproducibility of prediction techniques have not been established and are therefore generally not accepted by seismologists. For practical purposes, seismologists bring forth seismic hazardassessment programs by estimating the probabilitiesthat a given earthquake or suite of earthquakes will occur.
Controversy in trying to predict earthquakes
In the effort to predict earthquakes, people have tried to associate an impending earthquake with such varied phenomena as seismicity patterns,
electromagnetic fields, weather conditions and unusual clouds, radonor hydrogengas content of soil or ground water, water level in wells, and animal behavior.
Thus far, earthquake prediction is controversial because data are sparse and there is little evidence or verified physical theory to link observable phenomena to subsequent seismicity. The frequent practice of publishing predictions after the fact further complicates matters. Also, given enough predictions, it is virtually inevitable that some will succeed "by chance." Assessing whether a successful prediction is a fluke is challenging. Most assessments rely on chance models for earthquake occurrence, models that are difficult to test or validate, because large earthquakes are so rare, and because earthquake activity is naturally clustered in space and time.
Earthquake pre-detection versus prediction
Earthquake pre-detection is more reliable than earthquake prediction since it is based upon detecting the non-destructive primary waves that travel more quickly through the earth's crust than do the destructive secondary and Rayleigh waves, in the same way that lightning flashes reaches our eyes before we hear the thunder during a storm. The advance warning time available using this approach is only on the order of seconds (or tens of seconds for deep and distant large quakes), however there exists a technology currently in use known as the QuakeGuard™, Quake Alarm™ systems that employs this technique to automate emergency response procedures that protect against loss of life and reduce property damage.cite web |url=http://www.seismicwarning.com/web/technology/waveseparation.php |title=Earthquake P-wave Pre-Detection and Disaster Mitigation Technology |year= 1999]
Predictions versus forecasts
A meaningful earthquake prediction must have all the following elements:
* Specific area
* Specific magnitude or magnitude range
* Specific time window
* Estimate of probability compared to random chance
* A physical basis
A meaningful 'forecast' does not require the same accuracy, rather the term refers to prognostications on a longer time scale that are usually probabilistic.
Note that a physical basis is most critical for a prediction to have meaning to the geological community. Any method to make accurate predictions would be welcome and meaningful to many people even if no mechanism were known (much like doctors are now investigating diagnostics through statistical analysis of gene expression microarrays, even when the mechanisms linking particular genes to conditions remain unknown), as long as it was repeatable and the reliability could be quantified.
There are two flavors of tidal stressing that have been claimed to generate enhanced rates of earthquakes - diurnal and biweekly tides. The diurnal correlations would arise from more earthquakes only during the hours when the tidal stress is pushing in an encouraging direction, in contrast, biweekly effects would be based on earthquakes occurring during the days when the sinusoidal stressing oscillations are largest. The former, as most easily observed in the twice-daily rise and fall of the ocean tides, have occasionally been shown to influence tides (e.g., [cite journal
author = E. S. Cochran and J. E. Vidale and S. Tanaka
publisher = Science
journal = Science
pages = 1164–1166
year = 2004
title = Earth tides can trigger shallow thrust fault earthquakes
pmid = 15498971] , this paper shows there may be some weak tidal triggering of shallow, oceanic thrust-faulting earthquakes). The latter, which arises from the periodic alignment of the Sun and Moon, has often been claimed in the popular press to incubate earthquakes (sometimes termed the "syzygy" effect) and occasionally for small datasets in the scientific literature (e.g., [cite journal
author=John H. Glaser
publisher=The Geological Society of America
journal=Geology: Online Forum - Breathing of the seafloor
month=May | year=2003
title=Tidal correlations of seismicity
year=2003] ), but generally such effects do not appear in careful studies of large datasets.
Syzygy, which is not given much credence in the scientific community, is motivated by the observation that, historically, there have been some great earthquakes whose timing with when the tidal forces are near their maximum. For maximum tidal force, three factors must coincide: First, when the moon (in its elliptical orbit) is closest to the earth; second, when it is within a day or two of a new moon (so that the tidal forces of the moon and sun are acting in concert); and third, when the earth (in its elliptical orbit) is at or near its closest distance to the sun.
Shallow earthquakes near mid-ocean ridges, volcanic earthquakes, and episodic tremor and slip have also been observed to sometimes correlate with the diurnal tides, with enhanced activity correlating with times that faults are unclamped.
Earthquake prediction in China
Chinese earthquake prediction research is largely based on unusual events before earthquakes, such as change of ground water levels, strange animal behavior and foreshocks. The Chinese successfully predicted the
February 4, 1975M7.3 Haicheng earthquake [cite web
title=Earthquake Prediction: Haicheng, China - 1975
publisher=Earth Science Educational Resource Center
accessdate=2006-10-22 Course notes for a workshop held at the Mineral Physics Institute at the Stony Brook University.] and the China State Seismological Bureau ordered an evacuation of 1 million people the day before the earthquake, but failed to predict the
July 28, 1976M7.8 Tangshan earthquake. [cite web
title=Earthquake Prediction in China
author=George Pararas Carayannis
accessdate=2006-10-22] This failure put Chinese earthquake prediction research in doubt for several years.However, there are messages showing that the Tangshan earthquake was predicted successfully. [cite book
title=《 [唐山警世錄─七‧二八大地震漏報始末] 》上海人民出版社2006年1月初版，ISBN 7-208-06038-X /K.1170
publisher=上海人民出版社 zh icon] .Chinese research has now merged with Western research, but traditional techniques are still common. Another successful prediction of the
November 29, 1999, M5.4 Gushan-Pianling Earthquakein Haicheng city and Xiuyancity, LiaoningProvince, China was made a week before the earthquake. No fatalities or injuries were reported. [cite news
title=海城岫岩地震预测准确 (Roughly: Prediction of Youyan, Haicheng Earthquake was precise)
December 6, 1999
accessdate=2006-10-22 zh icon]
The "Detection of Electro-Magnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions" satellite, constructed by
CNES, has made observations which show strong correlations between certain types of low frequency electromagnetic activity and the seismically most active zones on the Earth, and have shown a sharp signal in the ionospheric electron densityand temperaturenear southern Japan seven days before a 7.1 magnitude occurred there (on August 29and September 5, 2004, respectively). [cite web
title=Satellite défilant du CNES (France)
The VAN method
VAN is a method of earthquake prediction proposed by Professors Varotsos, Alexopoulos and Nomicos in the 1980s; it was named after the researchers' initials. The method is based on the detection of "seismic electric signals" (SES) via a telemetric network of conductive metal rods inserted in the ground. The method stems from theoretical predictions by P. Varotsos, a solid-state physicist at the
National and Capodistrian University of Athens. It is continually refined as to the manner of identifying SES from within the abundant electric noise the VAN sensors are picking up. Researchers have claimed to be able to predict earthquakes of magnitude larger than 5, within 100 km of epicentral location, within .7 units of magnitude and in a 2-hour to 11-day time window. The method has undergone [http://www.amazon.com/Critical-Review-Van-Earthquake-Prediction/dp/9810225423 critical review] by [http://deprem.itu.edu.tr/VAN_METHOD.htm Sir James Lighthill] , and has [http://yochi.iord.u-tokai.ac.jp/eprc/res/incede/incede2a.html created scientific interest in Japan] .
It is claimed that animals can detect the
P-waveor ultrasonic wavegenerated by a big underground explosion or the rupture of an earthquake, even if the waves are too small for humans' senses. These waves travel faster than the S-waveand Rayleigh earthquake waves that most strongly shake the ground and causes the most damage; when this happens, animals can detect the incoming earthquake wave, and start behaving agitatedly or nervously.
Others postulate that the animal behavior is simply their response to an increase in low-frequency electromagnetic signals. The University of Colorado has demonstrated that electromagnetic activity can be generated by the fracturing of crystalline rock. Such activity occurs in fault lines before earthquakes. According to recent research, electromagnetic sensors yield statistically valid results in predicting earthquakes. [cite journal
author = T. Bleier and F. Freund
month=December | year=2005
title=Earthquake [earthquake warning systems]
Some people believe that in these ways, animals sense the immediate onset of earthquakes. In support of this claim, instances are cited when people have witnessed flight of animals just before an earthquake disaster. In fact, according to the Chief conservator of forests for the
Indian state of Tamil Nadu, a few minutes before the killer tsunamiwaves generated by an underwater earthquake hit the Indian coastline in December 2004, a 500-strong herd of blackbucks rushed away from the coastal areas to the safety of a nearby hilltop. Since the beginning of recorded history, observations of unusual animal behavior before earthquakes have been recorded by people from almost all civilizations. The Chinese began a systematic study of this unusual animal behavior and in December 1974 predicted a major earthquake that did, in fact, occur in February 1975. But skeptics claim to debunk nearly all such observations. In fact, the 1975 prediction relied most heavily on a series of strong foreshocks. The animal behavior reports are often ambiguous and not consistently observed. There is little evidence for animals being able to sense impending earthquakes, although it is likely they can sense the initial, weaker P-waves before people. Seismometers remain much more sensitive than even the animals, however.
In folklore, some animals have had more reports of being able to predict earthquakes than others, especially dogs, cats, chickens, horses, and other smaller animals. There have been reports with elephants, as well. Goats, cows, and most larger animals are generally reported as being less able to predict earthquakes.
Japanhas a long tradition associating catfish with earthquake prediction. From this idea emerged a long university research programme concluding in 2004 in which it was proposed that the (established) high sensitivity of catfish to electric fields was involved in detecting fields of a few hertzbecause of piezoelectriceffects on deeply buried quartzcrystals. Actual monitoring of catfish and correlation with earthquakes gave results that are not promising.
In early 2004, a group of scientists at the
University of California, Los Angeles, lead by Dr. Vladimir Keilis-Borok, predicted that a quake similar in strength to the San Simeon earthquakeof 2003 would occur in a 12,000 square mile (31,100 km) area of Southern Californiaby September of that year. The odds were given as 50/50.
In April 2004, the
California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council(CEPEC) evaluated Keilis-Borok's prediction and reported to the California State Office of Emergency Services. [cite web
title=Report to the Director, Governor's Office of Emergency Services
author=California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council
month=March | year=2002
format=PDF] CEPEC concluded that the "uncertainty along with the large geographic area included in the prediction (about 12,400 square miles) leads (us) to conclude that the results do not at this time warrant any special policy actions in California.” The predicted time window came and went with no significant earthquake.
Based on the historic record of the various published efforts to predict a quake, one might conclude that earthquake prediction is usually imprecise, but remains an art that is scientifically and socially useful.
According to new research to be published by Prof.
Shlomo Havlin, of Bar-Ilan University's Department of Physics, earthquakes form patterns which can improve the ability to predict the timing of their recurrence. In November 2005 (November 11 issue) the journal " Physical Review Letters", published by the American Physical Society, published an article by researchers from Israel and Germany that say that there is a way to predict when the next earthquake will hit.
Prof. Shlomo Havlin's from
Bar-Ilan Universityin Israel, in collaboration with Prof. Armin Bunde, of the Justus-Liebig University in Giessen, Germany, and Bar-Ilan University graduate student Valerie Livina used the "scaling" approach from physics to develop a mathematical function to characterize earthquakes of a wide range of magnitudes in order to learn from smaller magnitude earthquakes about larger magnitude earthquakes. The team's findings reveal that the recurrence of earthquakes is strongly dependent on the recurrence times of previous earthquakes.
This memory effect not only provides a clue to understanding the observed clustering of earthquakes, but also suggests that delays in earthquake occurrences, as seen today in Tokyo and in San Francisco, are a natural phenomenon.
In another paper in the journal "Nature", Richard Allen of the University of California claims that the distinction between small and large earthquakes can be made from the very first seconds of seismic energy recorded by seismometers, though other scientists are not convinced. [cite journal
November 9, 2005
title=The start of something big?
accessdate=2006-10-22] If correct this may make earthquake early warning (as distinct from prediction) more powerful. Earthquake early warning provides an alarm that strong shaking is due soon to arrive, and the more quickly that the magnitude of an earthquake can be estimated, the more useful is the early warning. However, earthquake early warning can still be effective without the ability to infer the magnitude of an earthquake in its initial second or two.
Loma Prieta, California
From 1968 to 1988 scientists in California mapped seismic activity on a cross section of the fault lines. They identified a "
seismic gap" in the Loma Prieta area from various features of the regional seismicity. They therefore concluded that Loma Prieta was due for an earthquake. On 17 October 1989the Loma Prieta earthquakeoccurred, initially reported as measuring 7.1 on the Richter scale but later more accurately recorded as moment magnitude 6.9, causing 63 deaths. This prediction, however was not very useful as it could not predict the exact date.
Earthquake warning system
Jim Berkland(and the role of the moon)
* The USGS view on earthquake prediction http://www.geophys.washington.edu/SEIS/PNSN/INFO_GENERAL/eq_prediction.html
* Earthquake forecasting techniques and more research on the study of electromagnetic fields: http://www.quakefinder.com/research/forecasttech.php
* Studies on Tide-Forming Forces and Earthquakes were published in [http://www.opteryx.de/docs/tamrazyan/Tamrazyan_1967.pdf 1967] and [http://www.opteryx.de/docs/tamrazyan/Tamrazyan_1968.pdf 1968] by
Elsevier, but the [http://earthquake.usgs.gov/faq/myths.html#5 U.S. Geological Survey: Common Myths About Earthquakes] contradicts this study.
* [http://www.petquake.org/ PetQuake] - encourages users to submit reports of atypical animal behavior and produces real-time dot map of the world
* [http://hayadan.org.il/english/2008/01/01/havli-earthquakes/ When Will the Next Earthquake Occur?]
* [http://www.isracast.com/tech_news/181105a_tech.htm Stopping the next big one] - Is Earthquake prediction and prevention possible?
* [http://quake.exit.com Earthquake Predictions]
* [http://www.earthquakeweather.org The Earthquake Weather Project]
* [http://www.quakeprediction.com Earthquake Prediction - updated daily]
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7435324.stm Plan for quake 'warning system'] (BBC News)
Earthquake prediction by geometric relationship of planets, moon, and sun.
* [http://www.quakestar.org Astronomical/astrological geometric relationship prediction]
* [http://www.seismicwarning.com/web/technology/waveseparation.php Earthquake Pre-Detection and Advance Warning Technology for Disaster Mitigation]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction — Part of a series on earthquakes Types Foreshock • Aftershock • Blind thrust Doublet • Interplate • … Wikipedia
California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council — The California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council (CEPEC) is a committee of earthquake experts that reviews potentially credible earthquake predictions and forecasts. Its purpose is to advise the Governor of California via the California… … Wikipedia
Earthquake cloud — Earthquake clouds are clouds claimed to be signs of imminent earthquakes. The analyses of earthquake clouds as a form of earthquake prediction are generally not accepted by seismologists and other scientists.In chapter 32 of his work Brihat… … Wikipedia
Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo — Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo(ERI; 東京大学地震研究所 Tokyo Daigaku Jishin Kenkyu jo ) is the institute in affiliation with University of Tokyo. It was founded in 1925. Many fellows research on various topics about Seismology and… … Wikipedia
earthquake — /errth kwayk /, n. 1. a series of vibrations induced in the earth s crust by the abrupt rupture and rebound of rocks in which elastic strain has been slowly accumulating. 2. something that is severely disruptive; upheaval. [1300 50; ME erthequake … Universalium
Earthquake — For other uses, see Earthquake (disambiguation). Global earthquake epicenters, 1963–1998 … Wikipedia
Earthquake light — An earthquake light is an unusual luminous aerial phenomenon, similar in appearance to the aurora borealis, that allegedly appears in the sky at or near areas of tectonic stress, seismic activity or volcanic eruptions. Scientific evidence for the … Wikipedia
Earthquake warning system — An earthquake warning system is a system of accelerometers, communication, computers, and alarms that is devised for regional notification of a substantial earthquake while it is in progress. This is not the same as earthquake prediction, which… … Wikipedia
Earthquake engineering — is the study of the behavior of buildings and structures subject to seismic loading. It is a subset of both structural and civil engineering.The main objectives of earthquake engineering are: * Understand the interaction between buildings or… … Wikipedia
Prediction of volcanic activity — (also: volcanic eruption forecasting ) is an interdisciplinary scientific and engineering approach to natural catastrophic event forecasting. Volcanic activity prediction has not been perfected, but significant progress has been made in recent… … Wikipedia