Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

In civil law, especially contract law, "ex turpi causa non oritur actio" is the doctrine that an action may not be founded on illegality. (The term is Latin, and means "from a dishonorable cause an action does not arise".) In US courts, this rule is more commonly known as the equitable principle of unclean hands. If the doctrine applies, the plaintiff is unable to pursue his cause of action.

The doctrine's principal application is to be found in the law of contract, and indeed some commentators confine its effect to contract alone (see: Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, 15th edition, p866).

In the law of tort, the principle would prevent a criminal from bringing a claim against (for example) a fellow criminal. In "National Coal Board v England" [1954] AC 403, Lord Asquith said "If two burglars, Alice and Bob, agree to open a safe by means of explosives, and Alice so negligently handles the explosive charge as to injure Bob, Bob might find some difficulty in maintaining an action against Alice."

It is not absolute in effect. For example, in "Revill v Newberry" [1996] 1 All ER 291, an elderly allotment holder was sleeping in his shed with a shotgun, to deter burglars. On hearing the plaintiff trying to break in, he shot his gun through a hole in the shed, injuring the plaintiff. At first instance, the defendant successfully raised the defence of "ex turpi" to avoid the claim. However, the Court of Appeal allowed the plaintiff's appeal, holding that the defendant was negligent to have shot blindly at body height, without shouting a warning or shooting a warning shot into the air, and that the response was out of all proportion to the threat.

The precise scope of the doctrine is not certain. In some cases, it seems that the illegality prevents a duty of care arising in the first place. For example, in "Ashton v Turner" [1981] QB 137, the defendant crashed a car in the course of getting away from the scene of a burglary, injuring the plaintiff. Ewbank J held that the court may not recognise a duty of care in such cases as a matter of public policy. Similarly, in "Pitts v Hunt" [1990] 3 All ER 344, the Court of Appeal rationalised this approach, saying that it was impossible to decide the appropriate standard of care in cases where the parties were involved in illegality. In other cases, the courts view "ex turpi" as a defence where otherwise a claim would lie, again on grounds of public policy. In "Tinsley v Milligan" [1992] Ch 310, Nicholls LJ (as he then was) in the Court of Appeal spoke of the court having to "weigh or balance the adverse consequences of granting relief against the adverse consequences of refusing relief". The plaintiff was ultimately successful in "Tinsley v Milligan" in the House of Lords, which allowed the claim on the grounds that the plaintiff did not need to rely on the illegality.

ee also

*Acts of the claimant
*Contributory negligence
*"Volenti non fit injuria"

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • ex turpi causa non oritur actio — an action will not arise from a disgraceful basis . In the modern law the disgraceful element is usually considered in terms of illegality or immorality. The doctrine, once confined to contract, often appears in other areas of the law, in… …   Law dictionary

  • ex turpi causa non oritur actio — /eks tarpay koza non oratar aeksh(iy)ow/ Out of a base [illegal, or immoral] consideration, an action does [can] not arise …   Black's law dictionary

  • Ex turpi causa non oritur actio — No cause of action can arise out of an immoral (or illegal) inducement (or consideration). 1 Am J2d Actions § 51 …   Ballentine's law dictionary

  • Volenti non fit injuria — (Latin: to a willing person, no injury is done or no injury is done to a person who consents ) is a common law doctrine which means that if someone willingly places themselves in a position where harm might result, knowing that some degree of… …   Wikipedia

  • Moore Stephens v Stone Rolls Ltd — Court House of Lords Citation(s) [2009] UKHL 39; [2009] 3 WLR 455 Case opinions Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lord Brown of Eaton under Heywood and Lord Mance …   Wikipedia

  • Tort — law Part of t …   Wikipedia

  • Acts of the claimant — In the English law of negligence, the acts of the claimant may give the defendant a defence to liability, whether in whole or part, if those acts unreasonably add to the loss.The principlesIn the normal course of events, the defendant is liable… …   Wikipedia

  • List of legal Latin terms — A number of Latin terms are used in legal terminology and legal maxims. This is a partial list of these legal Latin terms, which are wholly or substantially drawn from Latin. Contents: A B C D E F G H I J L M N O P Q R S T U V   …   Wikipedia

  • Términos jurídicos en latín — Anexo:Términos jurídicos en latín Saltar a navegación, búsqueda Se utiliza un gran número de términos jurídicos en latín en lo referente al derecho y otras máximas jurídicas. Esta es una lista parcial de aquellos términos latinos: Contenido 1 A 2 …   Wikipedia Español

  • Латинские правовые термины и выражения — A a fortiori  a posteriori  a priori  a priori assumption  ab extra  ab initio  actus reus  ad colligenda bona  ad hoc  ad hominem  ad idem  ad infinitum  ad litem  ad quod… …   Википедия

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.