- Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès
Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès (
May 3, 1748– June 20, 1836) (pronounced|sjejɛs or IPA| [sijɛs] ) was a French Roman Catholic" abbé" and statesman, one of the chief theorists of the French Revolution, French Consulate, and First French Empire. His 1789 pamphlet " What is the Third Estate?" became the manifesto of the Revolution that helped transform the Estates-General into the National Assembly in June 1789. In 1799, he was the instigator of the " coup d'état" of 18 Brumaire, which brought Napoleon Bonaparteto power. He was also the first to coin the term "sociologie" (French for "sociology") in an unpublished manuscript. Sieyès and his party spoke the language of democracy, unlike Jean Joseph Mounierand his party the Monarchiens.
He was born in
Fréjusin the south of France, and was educated for priesthood in the Roman Catholic Churchat the Sorbonne. While there, he became influenced by the teachings of John Locke, Étienne Bonnot de Condillac, the Encyclopédistes, and other political thinkers, all in preference to theology.
"What Is the Third Estate?" and the "Declaration"
In 1788, the King proposed convocation of the Estates-General of France after the interval of more than a century and a half, and the invitation of
Jacques Neckerto writers to state their views as to the organization of the Estates, enabled Sieyès to publish his celebrated January 1789 pamphlet, "Qu’est-ce que le tiers état?" ("What Is the Third Estate?") He begins his answer::"What is the Third Estate? Everything. What has it been hitherto in the political order? Nothing. What does it desire? To be something."
This phrase, which was to remain famous, is said to have been inspired by
Nicolas Chamfort. The pamphlet was very successful, and its author, despite his clerical vocation (which made him part of the First Estate), was elected as the last (the twentieth) of the deputies the Third Estate of Paristo the Estates-General. He played his main role in the opening years of the Revolution, drafting the " Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen", expanding on the theory of national sovereignty, popular sovereignty, and representation implied in his pamphlet, with a distinction between active and passive citizens that justified suffragelimited to male owners of property.
ignificance of "What Is the Third Estate?" to the French Revolution
The contributions of Sieyès’s pamphlet were indispensable to the revolutionary thought that projected France towards the
French Revolution. In his pamphlet he outlined the desires and frustrations of the alienated class of people that made up the third estate. In many senses of the expression, he was the force that ripped the band-aid off the Ancien Régimein France, there by revealing the fraudulent nobility and more importantly the overburdened and despondent working class on which they preyed. The pamphlet was essentially the rallying cry that united a voiceless class, whose subjugation by an elitist and self-serving French political culture gave way to an unheard-of political force, nonetheless, a force with outlined and clearly stated grievances that for the first time were not to be overlooked in the convocation of the Estates General.
The pamphlet redefined the meaning of “public service,” against the conventional wisdom. The aristocracy defined themselves as an elite ruling class charged with the “arduous” task of maintaining the social order in France. On the contrary, Sieyès saw public service as a function performed not by the first or second but rather the third estate. Expression of radical thought at its best, the pamphlet placed sovereignty not in the hands of the uninformed, self-serving aristocrats, but instead defined the nation of France by its working class, whose daily trials and tribulations “are the activities which support society.” The French Revolution could not have been what it was without this patriotic and “radical” message, more importantly one so eagerly dispersed by the rising revolutionary politics within the third estate.
Furthermore, by defining the third estate as the primary mechanism of public service, he deliberately called into question the role of the aristocracy, alternatively portraying their role as foreign to the nation of France. The aristocratic arrogance and their ability to act absolutely and without query were precisely the grounds upon which Sieyès justified noble privilege as “treason to the commonwealth.” This being perhaps the most daunting of his rhetorical repertoire, Sieyès essentially used the nobility’s own arrogance and self-imposed privileges to establish the aristocracy as an alien body acting outside of the general will and the nation of France. Ironically, it was for these exact self-serving means that the
Parlement of Parispressured the king to call the Estates general. As a consequence, the resulting conflict between the orders inspired the proper political sphere from which the revolution grew.
Perhaps most significant was the influence of Sieyès’s pamphlet on the structural concerns that arose surrounding the convocation of the Estates general. Specifically, the third estate demanded their representation be made up of members from the third estate, that the number of deputies for their order be equal that of the two privileged orders combined, and most controversially “that the States General Vote, Not by Orders, but by Heads.” The pamphlet took these issues to the masses and their partial appeasement was met with revolutionary reaction. By addressing the issues of unjust representation directly, Sieyès inspired resentment and agitation that united the third estate against the feudalistic traditions of the Ancien Régime.
Assemblies, Convention, and Terror
Although not noted as a speaker (he spoke rarely and briefly), Sieyès had major influence, and he recommended the decision of the Estates to reunite its chamber as the National Assembly, although he opposed the abolition of
tithes and the confiscation of Church lands. Elected to the special committee on the constitution, he opposed the right of "absolute veto" for the King of France, which Honoré Mirabeauunsuccessfully supported. He had considerable influence on the framing of the departmental system, but, after the spring of 1790, he was eclipsed by other politicians, and was elected only once to the post of fortnightly president of the Constituent Assembly.
Like all other members of the Constituent Assembly, he was excluded from the Legislative Assembly by the ordinance, initially proposed by
Maximilien Robespierre, that decreed that none of its members should be eligible for the next legislature. He reappeared in the third national Assembly, known as the National Conventionof the French Republic (September 1792 - September 1795). He voted for the death of Louis XVI, but not in the contemptuous terms sometimes ascribed to him. ["La Mort, sans phrases" ("Death, without rhetoric") being his supposed words during the debate on Louis' fate] Menaced by the Reign of Terror, and offended by its character, Sieyès even abjured his faith at the time of the installation of the Cult of Reason, and afterwards he characterized his conduct during the period in the ironic phrase, "J'ai vécu" ("I survived").
Directory and intrigue
In 1795 he went on a diplomatic mission to
The Hague, and was instrumental in drawing up a treaty between the French and Batavian republics. He resented the constitution of 1795 (that of the Directory), and refused to serve as a Director of the Republic. In May 1798 he went as the plenipotentiaryof France to the court of Berlin, in order to try to induce Prussiato ally with France against the Second Coalition; despite his efforts, this was not to happen. His prestige grew, and he was Director of France in place of Jean-François Rewbellin May 1799.
Nevertheless, Sieyès was considering ways to overthrow the Directory, and is said to have taken in view the replacement of the government with unlikely rulers such as
Archduke Charles of Austriaand Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand of Brunswick (a major enemy of the Revolution). He attempted to undermine the constitution, and thus caused the revived Jacobin Clubto be closed while making offers to General Joubert for a " coup d'état".
Brumaire, Empire, and later life
The death of Joubert at the
Battle of Novi, and the return of Napoleon Bonaparte from the Egypt campaign put an end to this project, but Sieyès resumed it by reaching a new understanding with Bonaparte. After " 18 Brumaire", Sieyès produced the constitution which he had long been planning, only to have it completely remodelled by Bonaparte, who thereby achieved a coup within the coup - the " Constitution of the Year VIII" favored by the latter became the basis of the Consulate.
Sieyès soon retired from the post of provisional
Consul, which he had accepted after Brumaire, and became one of the first members of the Sénat conservateur(acting as its president in 1799); pasquinades at the time linked this concession to the large estate at Crosnethat he received from Napoleon. [Crosne, Essonne, had belonged to the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prés, with a seigneurie that descended in the family of Brancas; both came to the French State with the Revolution.] After the plot of the Rue Saint-Nicaisein late December 1800, Sieyès the senator defended the arbitrary and illegal proceedings whereby Bonaparte rid himself of the leading Jacobins.
During the Empire (1804-1814) Sieyès rarely emerged from his retirement. When Napoleon briefly returned to power in 1815 he was named to the Chamber of Peers. After the Second Restoration Sieyès was expelled from the Academy in 1816 by Louis XVIII. He then moved to
Brussels, but returned to France after the July Revolutionof 1830. He died in Paris in 1836.
Sieyès and the Social Sciences
1795 Sieyès became one of the first members of the class of moral and political sciences, the future Academy of Moral and Political Sciences of the Institute of France. When the
French Academywas reorganized in 1803, he was elected in the second class replacing, in armchair 31, Jean Sylvain Bailly, who had been guillotined November 12, 1793during the Reign of Terror. After the second Restoration, however, in 1815, he was expelled for his role in the execution of King Louis XVI, and was replaced by the Marquis of Lally-Tollendal, who was named to the Academy by a royal decree.
The recent publication of his unpublished works shows that he was the first to use the term 'sociologie' in 1780, ["Des Manuscrits de Sieyès. 1773-1799", Volumes I and II, published by Christine Fauré, Jacques Guilhaumou, Jacques Vallier et Françoise Weil, Paris, Champion, 1999 and 2007 ] although the term was some fifty years later again introduced as a neologism by
Auguste Comtewho helped to popularize the concept to refer to the science of society.
Les Neuf Sœurs"
* [http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Sieve "Encyclopaedia Britannica" 1911:] Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes
* [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/sieyes.html Emmanuel Joseph Sieyes, "What is the Third Estate?"] (Excerpts)
* [http://www.thenagain.info/Classes/Sources/Sieyes.html "What is the third estate?"]
NAME=Sieyès, Emmanuel Joseph
SHORT DESCRIPTION=French "
abbé" and statesman
DATE OF BIRTH=
May 3, 1748
PLACE OF BIRTH=
DATE OF DEATH=
June 20, 1836
PLACE OF DEATH=
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès — (1817), por Jacques Louis David. Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, Conde Sieyès (Fréjus, 3 de mayo de 1748 París, 20 de junio de 1836) fue un político, eclesiástico, ensayista y académico francés, uno de los teórico … Wikipedia Español
Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes — Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès par Jacques Louis David Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès (prononcer [sjejɛs]), né le 3 mai 1748 à Fréjus et mort le 20 juin 1836 à Paris, est un ho … Wikipédia en Français
Emmanuel-joseph sieyès — par Jacques Louis David Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès (prononcer [sjejɛs]), né le 3 mai 1748 à Fréjus et mort le 20 juin 1836 à Paris, est un ho … Wikipédia en Français
Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès — par Jacques Louis David Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès (prononcer [sjejɛs]), né le 3 mai 1748 à Fréjus et mort le 20 juin 1836 à Paris, est un ho … Wikipédia en Français
Emmanuel Joseph Siéyès — Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès par Jacques Louis David Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès (prononcer [sjejɛs]), né le 3 mai 1748 à Fréjus et mort le 20 juin 1836 à Paris, est un ho … Wikipédia en Français
Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès — (3 de mayo de 1748 †20 de junio de 1836), político y hombre de estado francés, uno de los teóricos de la Revolución Francesa y de la era napoleónica. Nació en Fréjus, al sur de Francia, y fue educado por la Iglesia en la Sorbona. Mientras estuvo… … Enciclopedia Universal
Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Sieyès (homonymie). Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès … Wikipédia en Français
Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès — Porträt Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès von Jacques Louis David aus dem Jahr 1817 Emmanuel Joseph (seit 1808 Graf) Sieyès, auch: l abbé Sieyès [ɛmaˈnɥɛl ʒoˈzɛf sjeˈjɛs] (* 3. Mai 1748 in Fréjus; † 20. Juni … Deutsch Wikipedia
Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès — Porträt Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès von Jacques Louis David aus dem Jahr 1817 Emmanuel Joseph (seit 1808 Graf) Sieyès [ɛmaˈnɥɛl ʒoˈzɛf sjeˈjɛs] (* 3. Mai 1748 in Fréjus; † 20. Juni 1836 in … Deutsch Wikipedia
Emmanuel-Joseph Siéyès — Porträt Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès von Jacques Louis David aus dem Jahr 1817 Emmanuel Joseph (seit 1808 Graf) Sieyès [ɛmaˈnɥɛl ʒoˈzɛf sjeˈjɛs] (* 3. Mai 1748 in Fréjus; † 20. Juni 1836 in … Deutsch Wikipedia