Rational mapping

In mathematics, in particular the subfield of algebraic geometry, a rational map is a kind of partial function between algebraic varieties. In this article we use the convention that varieties are irreducible.


A first attempt

Suppose we take the prescription literally that a rational map is to be a partial function between two varieties. Then we must make the (ultimately incorrect) definition:

* A rational map from V to W is a pair F = (U, f), where U subset V is an open set and f colon U o W is a morphism of varieties.

To see how far we can get with this definition, we will try to define the composition of two rational maps F = (U,f), G = (T, g) with U subset V, T subset W. This should just be the composition g circ f, defined on at least a subset of U, but this is meaningless unless the range of f is inside T. Nonetheless, we have at least a partially defined composition law, whenever f(U) subset T. We might try to extend the definition by saying that the composition G circ F is obtained by extending g onto a larger open set containing f(U) (if possible) and then composing with f. This is easily seen not to depend on the extension we take.

With this definition, when g is the identity map on T then g circ f = f. Likewise, if f is the identity map on U, then g circ f = g. This means that we have a different rational map which is the identity for every open subset of every variety, which is at least philosophically offensive. However, we have a sort of built-in correction if we take the extended definition of composition, in that if we have identities defined on nested open sets T subset T', they compose equally with every (U, f) with f(U) subset T. Since we would like, if possible, to have only one identity map, we can try to identify (T, { m id}_T), (T', { m id}_{T'}) in this case. Since of course the identity map makes sense on "any" domain, and since every open set is contained in the entire variety W, this means that we have at least succeeded in identifying all prospective identity maps. The result is the following:
* The identity rational map on a variety W is the collection of all pairs (T, { m id}_T) with T subset W an open subset.Considering that this was motivated by the extended definition of composition, we are led to make a similar definition for all rational maps.

Formal definition

Formally, a rational map f colon V o W between two varieties is an equivalence class of pairs (f_U, U) in which f_U is a morphism of varieties from U to W, and two such pairs (f_U, U) and (f_V, V) are considered equivalent if f_U and f_V coincide on the intersection U cap V (this is, in particular, vacuously true if the intersection is empty). The proof that this defines an equivalence relation relies on the following lemma:

* If two morphisms of varieties are equal on any dense open set, then they are equal.

Given such an equivalence class, f itself is supposed to be interpreted as the function obtained by gluing together the partial functions f_U to obtain a function on the union of all U which appear. This itself may be a partial function if the U do not form an open cover of V.

We return to the problem of composition. Two arbitrary rational maps f colon V o W, g colon W o X can not necessarily be composed, but if f has dense image then they can: pick any representative pairs (f_U, U), (g_V, V) and note that since f_U(U) is dense in W it must intersect V, and so f_U^{-1}(V) is a nonempty open subset of V (as a morphism is necessarily continuous). Then g_V circ f_U is defined on this set, so we take g circ f to be the equivalence class containing the pair (g_V circ f_U, f_U^{-1}(V)).

Dominant and birational maps

We encountered the following condition in considering composition: f is said to be dominant if the range of any of the f_U is dense in W (this then implies that the range of any of them is dense, since open sets are dense in a variety). Since dominant rational maps can be composed, we can go further and talk about their inverses: a dominant rational map f is said to be birational if there exists a rational map g colon W o V which is its inverse, where the composition is taken in the above sense.

The importance of rational maps to algebraic geometry is in the connection between such maps and maps between the function fields of V and W. Even a cursory examination of the definitions reveals a similarity between that of rational map and that of rational function; in fact, a rational function is just a rational map whose range (or codomain, more categorically precisely) is the projective line. Composition of functions then allows us to "pull back" rational functions along a rational map, so that a single rational map f colon V o W induces a homomorphism of fields K(W) o K(V). In particular, the following theorem is central: the functor from the category of projective varieties with dominant rational maps (over a fixed base field, for example mathbb{C}) to the category of field extensions of the base field with reverse inclusion of extensions as morphisms, which associates each variety to its function field and each map to the associated map of function fields, is an equivalence of categories.

An example of birational equivalence

Two varieties are said to be birationally equivalent if there exists a birational map between them; this theorem states that birational equivalence of varieties is identical to isomorphism of their function fields as extensions of the base field. This is somewhat more liberal than the notion of isomorphism of varieties (which requires a globally defined morphism to witness the isomorphism, not merely a rational map), in that there exist varieties which are birational but not isomorphic.

The usual example is that mathbb{P}^2_k is biratonal to the variety X contained in mathbb{P}^3_k consisting of the set of projective points [w : x : y : z] such that xy - wz = 0, but not isomorphic. Indeed, any two lines in mathbb{P}^2_k intersect, but the lines in X defined by w = x = 0 and y = z = 0 cannot intersect since their intersection would have all coordinates zero. To compute the function field of X we pass to an affine subset (which does not change the field, a manifestation of the fact that a rational map depends only on its behavior in any open subset of its domain) in which w eq 0; in projective space this means we may take w = 1 and therefore identify this subset with the affine xyz-plane. There, the coordinate ring of X is:A(X) = k [x,y,z] /(xy - z) cong k [x,y] via the map p(x,y,z) mapsto p(x,y,xy). And the field of fractions of the latter is just k(x,y), isomorphic to that of mathbb{P}^2_k. Note that at no time did we actually produce a rational map, though tracing through the proof of the theorem it is possible to do so.

ee also

* Birational geometry


* | year=1977, section I.4.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Mapping class group — In mathematics, in the sub field of geometric topology, the mapping class group is an important algebraic invariant of a topological space. Briefly, the mapping class group is a discrete group of symmetries of the space. Contents 1 Motivation 2… …   Wikipedia

  • Rational normal curve — In mathematics, the rational normal curve is a smooth, rational curve C of degree n in projective n space mathbb{P}^n. It is a simple example of a projective variety. The twisted cubic is the special case of n =3.DefinitionThe rational normal… …   Wikipedia

  • Rational choice theory (criminology) — In criminology, the Rational Choice Theory adopts a Utilitarian belief that man is a reasoning actor who weighs means and ends, costs and benefits, and makes a rational choice.In democratic countries, like that of the United States or United… …   Wikipedia

  • Rational variety — In mathematics, a rational variety is an algebraic variety, over a given field K, which is birationally equivalent to projective space of some dimension over K. This is a question on its function field: is it up to isomorphism the field of all… …   Wikipedia

  • Rational data industry model — The Rational Data Industry Model is overseen by Rational Data International, an umbrella company. The industry model is designed to be self supporting, synergistic, and complementary on a number of different levels. One of its significant… …   Wikipedia

  • Crime mapping — Mapping of homicides in Washington D.C. Crime mapping is used by analysts in law enforcement agencies to map, visualize, and analyze crime incident patterns. It is a key component of crime analysis and the CompStat policing strategy. Mapping… …   Wikipedia

  • Non-uniform rational B-spline — Three dimensional NURBS surfaces can have complex, organic shapes. Control points influence the directions the surface takes. The outermost square below delineates the X/Y extents of the surface …   Wikipedia

  • Nonuniform rational B-spline — Non uniform rational B spline (NURBS) is a mathematical model commonly used in computer graphics for generating and representing curves and surfaces. History Development of NURBS (Non Uniform Rational Basis Spline) began in the 1950s by engineers …   Wikipedia

  • Tone Mapping — Tone Mapping, Tone Reproduction oder Dynamikkompression sind synonyme Begriffe, die die Kompression des Dynamikumfangs von Hochkontrastbildern (high dynamic range images) bezeichnen, also von digitalen Bildern mit hohem Helligkeitsumfang. Beim… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • List of mathematics articles (R) — NOTOC R R. A. Fisher Lectureship Rabdology Rabin automaton Rabin signature algorithm Rabinovich Fabrikant equations Rabinowitsch trick Racah polynomials Racah W coefficient Racetrack (game) Racks and quandles Radar chart Rademacher complexity… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.