Virginia v. Black


Virginia v. Black

SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Virginia v. Black et al.
ArgueDate=December 11
ArgueYear=2002
DecideDate=April 7
DecideYear=2003
FullName=Commonwealth of Virginia, Petitioner, v. Barry Elton Black, Richard J. Elliott, and Jonathan O'Mara
USVol=538
USPage=343
Citation=123 S. Ct. 1536; 155 L. Ed. 2d 535; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 2715; 71 U.S.L.W. 4263; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2954; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 3767; 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 203
Prior=On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia. Black v. Commonwealth, 262 Va. 764, 553 S.E.2d 738 (2001)
Subsequent=Appeal after remand at Elliott v. Commonwealth, 267 Va. 464, 593 S.E.2d 263 (2004)
Holding=Virginia's statute against cross burning is unconstitutional because it places the burden of proof on the defendant to demonstrate that he or she did not intend the cross burning as intimidation.
SCOTUS=1994-2005
OralArgument=http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_01_1107/argument/
Majority=O'Connor (parts I, II, III)
JoinMajority=Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Breyer
Concurrence=O'Connor (parts IV, V)
JoinConcurrence=Rehnquist, Stevens, Breyer
Concurrence2=Stevens
Concurrence/Dissent=Scalia
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=Thomas (parts I, II)
Concurrence/Dissent2=Souter
JoinConcurrence/Dissent2=Kennedy, Ginsburg
Dissent=Thomas
LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend I

"Virginia v. Black et al.", 538 U.S. 343 (2003), was a First Amendment case decided in the Supreme Court of the United States. The respondent, Barry Elton Black, had been convicted of violating a Virginia statute against cross burning. In this case, the Court struck down that statute because it takes the act of cross burning as "prima facie" evidence of intent to intimidate. Such a provision, they argue, blurs the distinction between proscribable "threats of intimidation" and the Ku Klux Klan's protected "messages of shared ideology." However, cross-burning can be a criminal offense if the intent to intimidate is proven.

Background

In cases such as "Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire", ussc|315|568|1942, "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan", ussc|376|254|1964, "R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul" (1992) and others, the Supreme Court has addressed various areas of controversial speech. The Court has frequently sided with the speakers, but occasionally the Court has sided with the government and acknowledged its (limited) power to pass laws protecting citizens from specific types of harmful speech.

Majority

In "Virginia v. Black et al." the Court found that Virginia's statute against cross burning done with an attempt to intimidate is constitutional because such expression has a long and pernicious history as a signal of impending violence. Justice O' Connor delivered the opinion stating, "a state, consistent with the First Amendment, may ban cross burning carried out with the attempt to intimidate." In so doing, the Court created a new area of constitutionally unprotected speech for "true threats." Under that carve-out, "a State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm."

The Court did, however, strike down the provision in Virginia's statute which stated "Any such burning of a cross shall be "prima facie" evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group of persons," holding that the provision was facially unconstitutional because of its "indiscriminate coverage." The state, therefore, must prove intent to intimidate.

Dissents

Justice Clarence Thomas argued that cross-burning itself should be a First Amendment exception, like flag-burning (see Justice William Rehnquist’s dissenting opinion in "Texas v. Johnson"), due to its historical associations with terrorism. " [T] his statute," Thomas writes, "prohibits only conduct, not expression. And, just as one cannot burn down someone's house to make a political point and then seek refuge in the First Amendment, those who hate cannot terrorize and intimidate to make their point."

Justice David Souter argued that cross-burning, even with the proven intent to intimidate, should not be a crime under the R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul precedent because of "the statute’s content-based distinction."

ee also

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 538

External links

* [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=01-1107 Full text of the Court's decision on FindLaw]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Virginia Legislative Black Caucus — The Virginia Legislative Black Caucus is an American political organization composed of African Americans elected to the Virginia General Assembly.PrioritiesThe No. 1 budget priority is continuing to fund a proton beam cancer center at Hampton… …   Wikipedia

  • Black Heath (Chesterfield County) — Black Heath was a home and coal mine located along the Old Buckingham Road in the present Midlothian area of Chesterfield County, Virginia. The Black Heath coal mining enterprises were operated by the Heth family between 1785 and 1844, when the… …   Wikipedia

  • Black Fork (Cheat River) — Black Fork Einzugsgebiet des Monongahela Rivers mit dem Black Fork. DatenV …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Virginia Units in the Civil War — Virginia provided the following units to the Virginia Militia and the Provisional Army of the Confederate States during the American Civil War.Infantry Units (PACS)Infantry Brigades*1st Virginia Brigade (Stonewall Brigade) *2nd Virginia Brigade… …   Wikipedia

  • Black Caucus — may refer to one of the following: In the United States *Congressional Black Caucus *National Black Caucus of State Legislators *Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, Inc. Individual States of the United States*Alabama Legislative House Senate… …   Wikipedia

  • Black Wolf, West Virginia — Black Wolf is an unincorporated community located in McDowell County, West Virginia, USA. Black Wolf lies along the Norfolk and Western Railroad on the Tug Fork River. External links …   Wikipedia

  • Virginia — This article is about the U.S. state, the Commonwealth of Virginia. For other uses, see Virginia (disambiguation). Commonwealth of Virginia …   Wikipedia

  • Black Fives — For the locomotive, see Black Five. The Black Fives usually refers to basketball leagues that thrived in the United States in the period between 1900 and 1940, when racial segregation was institutionalized, in which African American players in… …   Wikipedia

  • Virginia Union University — Established 1865 Type Private, HBCU Religious affiliation America …   Wikipedia

  • Black Dispatches — was a common term used among Union military men in the American Civil War for intelligence on Confederate forces provided by Negroes. This source of information represented a prolific and productive category of intelligence obtained and acted on… …   Wikipedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.