Move to the Left

The heart of the move to the left can be simply stated. It is... that political and economic power must be vested in the majority

—Uganda People's Congress, Common Man's Charter, 1969

The Move to the Left was a policy direction undertaken in the East African state of Uganda, most notably under President Milton Obote in the period 1968–1971. Despite being nominally a move towards socialism, it also had strong nationalist overtones.[1]

Contents

Beginnings

According to Akena Adoko, former head of the General Service Unit in Uganda, it took time for socialism to be established in Uganda because of the political realities of the time:[1]

The first and nominal socialist phase was from 1952 to 1963 when the Uganda National Congress and later the UPC professed socialism. But it could not be implemented as the colonial administration preferred capitalism which they covered under the name 'mixed economy'. During the second phase from independence day certain socialist measures were implemented, but on the whole, the split in the Cabinet between leftists and rightists completely neutralised all efforts for the 'Move to the Left'. The word socialism was even scrapped from the party constitution, and was only reinstated after the 1966 crisis [when Obote turned to the Army and suspended the constitution in order to solidify his position].
—Akena Adoko, Work for Progress, Uganda's Second Five-Year Plan 1966-71 (Entebbe, 1966), 15

Between 1966 and 1969, however, little of a socialist bent was announced. Selwyn Ryan attributes this to Obote's political instability, suggesting that Obote "did not at first consider himself sufficiently strong politically to embark upon radical economic policies." Yash Tandon observed that "Obote has not until recently [1970] been free from the problems of maintaining the basic unity of the country.. [he] was always inclined towards a socialist path for Uganda, but for reasons of state and politics played this down between 1962 and 1968.[2] The second Five Year Plan (roughly 1966-1971) noted the potential of the state-controlled Uganda Development Corporation, but also sought to promote small, private industry and attract foreign investment. There were few genuine socialists in Uganda, let alone socialists with genuine administrative ability. Of these, very few enjoyed the confidence of Obote.[1]

It was in November 1968 that Obote remarked that Uganda was pursuing a "middle of the road strategy", one that was "neither left nor right", and predicted a leftwards swing in policy during 1969. The Common Man's Charter, which was published for comment in October 1969 and approved by the Party on 19 December, was the first major document that attempted to give definition to the Move to the Left. It stated that "the heart of the move to the left can be simply stated. It is.... that political and economic power must be vested in the majority", typifying the mixture of socialist and nationalist motivations the policy represented. The first step was to establish the state owned Uganda Commercial Bank and to require foreign banks operating in Uganda to re-incorporate in Uganda itself.[1]

Nakivubo Pronouncement

Despite sentiments at the time that these moves had taken the momentum out of the push for socialism, by late 1969 Obote had decided that something more radical needed to be done. On 1 May 1970 he outlined his Nakivubo Pronouncement. It proclaimed that, with immediate effect, the government was to take control of 60% (up from at most 51%) of over 80 corporations in Uganda;[3] they would now be run by state corporations, trade unions, municipal councils and cooperative unions.[1] The list included all banks, insurance companies, manufacturing and mining industries, plantations, oil companies and transport undertakings in Uganda.[4] The pronouncement added that a government monopoly would be enforced in Uganda's import-export markets[4] with the exception of oil.[5]

In reality, little preparation had been carried out, nor thought given to the pronouncement's consequences; it seems that the President did not even give the Cabinet any prior warning of his decision.[4] The criteria for nationalisation were not made clear and there was great uncertainty as to whether the nationalisation exercise was complete. It was not even clear whether the nationalisation was supposed to complement the Africanisation of Uganda commerce or to re-prioritise it.[1] The "governmental machine was thrown into the kind of incoherent muddle which became increasingly characteristic of the regime's final phase."[4] The result was that nationalisation was never fully realised, and the government never took control of Uganda's major industries.[3]

Evaluation

Ugandan commentators worried that the Move to the Left, insofar as it was socialist, could not co-exist with plans to Africanise the Ugandan economy, since the latter promoted African enterprise (what Ryan termed "petty bourgeois accumulation") in a way that was incompatible with the planned economy model of socialism. Particular vocal in their hostility to nationalisation were many UPC members of parliament, who were themselves business owners. Former Minister Sam Odaka tried to reassure him that this was not the case. "We appeal to people not to put wrong interpretations on the Common Man's Charter," he said. "It does not stop a person building ten houses if he does it properly." Ultimately, the issue was not resolved before the government was overthrown by a military coup in January 1971. There was no attempt to abandon the incentives that were being offered to promote African capitalism.[1] This has led commentators such as Ryan to comment:

Whatever the motivations of Obote, the Move to the Left in Uganda must be seen in practice as a nationalist rather than a socialist exercise. The behaviour of the educated and business elite certainly indicates that racial, national, and vocational considerations were of major importance and that socialism was something to which only ritualistic obeisance was paid if any concern was expressed about it at all... talk about the Common Man was more often than not cynical in the extreme.

Genuine socialists despaired of any chance of seeing socialism implemented in Uganda in their life-time... While the need for redistribution was repeatedly... the redistribution

the UPC leadership was most concerned with was from the former metropolis to the new nation, from Asians to Africans, and only marginally from rich Africans to poor Africans.
—Selwyn Ryan, "Economic nationalism and socialism in Uganda". Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 11: 140—158. 1973. 

Revocation

Obote's overthrow by the forces of Idi Amin in the military coup of January 1971 ended hopes of a full move toward socialism. The incoming Minister of Finance declared that the new regime would "break away from the trend towards absolute central control of the economy and adopt a more liberal economic policy". In his Kabale Pronouncement of 1 May 1971, a year to the day after Obote's Nakivubo Pronouncement, Amin confirmed this swing, and added that pure socialism and capitalism were only of academic interest to him; his aim was to choose elements of either which might be relevant to Uganda's needs. Except for four banks, four insurance companies, two locally owned sugar companies, and the East African Steel Corporation in which the government retained 49% of the shares, all other firms were left completely in private hands. The Move to the Left was clearly no longer a policy of the administration.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Ryan, Selwyn D. (1973). "Economic nationalism and socialism in Uganda". Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 11: 140—158. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a791693476. Retrieved 15 August 2010. 
  2. ^ Tandon, Yash (1 June 1970). The People. Cited by Ryan.
  3. ^ a b H. Mittelman, James (1977). "Devising an Ideology: The Demonstration Effect in East Africa.". Cahiers d'études africaines 17 (66-67): 262–3. http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cea_0008-0055_1977_num_17_66_2453. Retrieved 15 August 2010. 
  4. ^ a b c d Chick, John D. (December 1972). "Class Conflict and Military Intervention in Uganda". The Journal of Modern African Studies (Cambridge University Press) 10 (4): 634–637. http://www.jstor.org/stable/160020. Retrieved 14 August 2010. 
  5. ^ Collins, Robert O. (1991). Eastern African history. Markus Wiener Publishers. p. 46. ISBN 9781558760165. http://books.google.com/books?id=v9NIrNTedJkC&pg=PA46. Retrieved 14 August 2010. 

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • The Left (Germany) — The Left Die Linke Leader Gesine Lötzsch Klaus Ernst Founded 16 J …   Wikipedia

  • Future of the Left — Infobox musical artist Name = Future of the Left Background = group or band Origin = Cardiff, Wales Genre = Rock Years active = 2005 – present Label = 4AD URL = [http://www.futureoftheleft.com/ Official website] Current members = Andy Falco… …   Wikipedia

  • Back and to the left — is a phrase originating from the 1991 Oliver Stone movie JFK about the assassination of John F. Kennedy, 35th President of the United States. In the movie, Jim Garrison, played by Kevin Costner, screens the Zapruder film to a jury, pausing and… …   Wikipedia

  • To take ground to the left — Take Take, v. t. [imp. {Took} (t[oo^]k); p. p. {Taken} (t[=a]k n); p. pr. & vb. n. {Taking}.] [Icel. taka; akin to Sw. taga, Dan. tage, Goth. t[=e]kan to touch; of uncertain origin.] 1. In an active sense; To lay hold of; to seize with the hands …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • Curses (Future of the Left album) — Curses Studio album by Future of the Left Released September 24, 2007 Genre Alternative rock Label …   Wikipedia

  • Counting Hallways to the Left — Studio album by Embrace the End Released June 28, 2005 …   Wikipedia

  • The Loop, River Dart — The Loop is a section of the River Dart, Dartmoor. It is perhaps the most popular section of whitewater for kayakers and canoeists in England. This section is preceded by the Upper Dart, and followed by the The Lower. Overview The Loop is named… …   Wikipedia

  • The Mike Malloy Show — Genre Progressive talk Running time Three hours Country United States …   Wikipedia

  • move — [[t]mu͟ːv[/t]] ♦ moves, moving, moved 1) V ERG When you move something or when it moves, its position changes and it does not remain still. [V n prep/adv] She moved the sheaf of papers into position... [V n prep/adv] You can move the camera both… …   English dictionary

  • left — adjective it s in my left pocket move to the left side Syn: left hand, sinistral; Nautical port, larboard; Heraldry sinister Ant: right, starboard …   Thesaurus of popular words


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.