Garcia v National Australia Bank
Infobox Court Case
name=Garcia v National Australia Bank
High Court of Australia
date_decided=6 August 1998
full_name= Garcia v National Australia Bank
citations= [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/1998/48.html (1998) 194 CLR 395] , [http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/1998/48.html 1998 HCA 48]
judges= Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, & Callinan JJ
|prior_actions="National Australia Bank v Garcia" 1996 NSWLR 577 – appeal in the
New South Wales Court of Appeal
"Garcia v National Australia Bank" was an important case decided in the
High Court of Australiaon 6 August 1998.cite web | title=Garcia v National Australia Bank|work=Australasian Legal Information Institute | url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/1998/48.html| accessdaymonth=30 September|accessyear=2008] The case determined the circumstances under which it is unconscionable for a lender to enforce a transaction against a wife. It is considered a very important case in Australian Equity (law), as it continues to be the leading case in spouse-surety cases.
In 1979, Jean Balharry Garcia and her then husband, Fabio Garcia, executed a mortgage over their jointly owned matrimonial home in favour of
National Australia Bank. Between 1979 and 1987, Jean Balharry Garcia also signed several guarantees. These documents were signed to secure a loan that was made to Fabio Garcia for use in his company, Citizens Gold Bullion Exchange Pty Limited. The couple separated in 1988, and in the following year, Fabio Garcia's company wound up.
In 1990, Jean Balharry Garcia commenced proceedings in the
Supreme Court of New South Walesseeking declarations that the various documents were of no force or effect, and void. The trial judge applied the rule in "Yerkey v Jones"' and granted a declaration that none of the guarantees which the appellant had given bound her.
On appeal, the
New South Wales Court of Appealheld that the rule in "Yerkey v Jones" should no longer be applied as it had been overruled by "Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio".
The appellant was granted leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.
By a majority of five to six, the High Court declined to adopt the approach taken by Lord Browne-Wilkinson in "Barclays Bank Plc v O'Brien", and instead, held that the rule in "Yerkey v Jones" still applied in Australia. Justice Kirby in his dissenting judgement argued that the approach taken in "Yerkey v Jones" should be rejected. However, the High Court was unanimous in overturning the decision of the Court of Appeal in favour of reinstating the trial judge's orders.
The High Court also held that the law of unconscionability as established in "Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio" did not cover the rule in "Yerkey v Jones", and instead, both of these cases were considered as distinct doctrines.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Diego Garcia — For other uses, see Diego Garcia (disambiguation). Diego Garcia IATA: NKW – ICAO: FJDG Summary … Wikipedia
Military history of Australia — History of Australia … Wikipedia
Colombia national football team — Colombia Nickname(s) Los Cafeteros (The Coffee Growers) Association Colombian Football Federation (Federación Colombiana de Fútbol) Confederation CONMEBOL (South America) … Wikipedia
Colombia national under-20 football team — Colombia Nickname(s) Los Cafeteros (The Coffee Growers) Association Colombian Football Federation (Federación Colombiana de Fútbol) Confederation CONMEBOL (South America) Head coach … Wikipedia
Undue influence — (as a term in jurisprudence) is an equitable doctrine that involves one person taking advantage of a position of power over another person. It is where free will to bargain is not possible.Undue influence in contract lawIf undue influence is… … Wikipedia
Dates of 2004 — ▪ 2005 January It turns out we were all wrong, probably, in my judgment. David Kay, former U.S. chief weapons inspector in Iraq, in testimony to the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, January 28 January 1 Haitian Pres. Jean… … Universalium
May 2011 — was the fifth month of the current year. It began on a Sunday and ended after 31 days on a Tuesday. International holidays (See Holidays and observances, on sidebar at right, below) Portal:Current events This is an archived version of Wikipedia s … Wikipedia
News Corporation — Type Public Traded as NASDAQ: NWS … Wikipedia
Grupo Santander — Este artículo trata del Grupo Santander como conjunto del grupo de empresas financieras y de otro tipo. Para la entidad bancaria cabecera del Grupo Santander, véase Banco de Santander. Grupo Santander Tipo … Wikipedia Español
Dates of 2008 — ▪ 2009 January As we meet tonight, our economy is undergoing a period of uncertainty.… At kitchen tables across our country, there is a concern about our economic future. U.S. Pres. George W. Bush, in his final state of the union address, January … Universalium