Oregon Ballot Measure 36 (2004)

Oregon Ballot Measure 36 (2004)
A van in 2009 displays bumper stickers against Measure 9 (2000) and Measure 36.

Ballot Measure 36 was a 2004 initiative in the U.S. state of Oregon. It amended the Oregon Constitution to define marriage as a union of one man and one woman. The initiative passed with 1,028,546 votes in favor, and 787,556 votes against (57% to 43%) in the November 2, 2004 general election.[1] It is one of a number of U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions.



Results by county:
  Yes by a two-thirds majority
Measure 36[1]
Choice Votes Percentage
Referendum passed Yes 1,028,546 56.63%
No 787,556 43.37%
Total votes 1,816,102 100.00%

Amendment to Constitution

Legal recognition of
same-sex relationships


South Africa

Performed in some jurisdictions

Mexico: Mexico City
United States: CT, DC, IA, MA, NH, NY, VT, Coquille, Suquamish

Recognized, not performed

Aruba (Netherlands only)
Curaçao (Netherlands only)
Mexico: all states (Mexico City only)
Sint Maarten (Netherlands only)
United States: CA (conditional), MD

Civil unions and
registered partnerships

Czech Republic
- New Caledonia
- Wallis and Futuna

Isle of Man
New Zealand
United Kingdom

Performed in some jurisdictions

Australia: ACT, NSW, TAS, VIC
Mexico: COA
United States: CA, CO, DE, HI, IL, ME, NJ, NV, OR, RI, WA, WI

Unregistered cohabitation



Recognized in some jurisdictions

United States: MD

See also

Same-sex marriage
Same-sex marriage legislation
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Marriage privatization
Civil union
Domestic partnership
Listings by country

LGBT portal
v · d · e

Measure 36 added the following text to Article 15 of the Oregon Constitution, as Section 5a:[2]

Policy regarding marriage. It is the policy of Oregon, and its political subdivisions, that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or legally recognized as a marriage. [Created through initiative petition filed March 2, 2004, and adopted by the people Nov. 2, 2004]

Political context

The measure was placed on the ballot through an initiative petition brought by the Defense of Marriage Coalition, a group dedicated to "preserving marriage as a union only between one man and one woman." The group was formed in reaction to same-sex marriages performed in Multnomah County and Benton County after their respective county commissions interpreted the Oregon Constitution and Oregon law as authorizing the issuing of marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Supporters of the measure, in addition to opposing same-sex marriage on principle, were also angry by the controversial means by which the Multnomah County Commission had come to its decision: no public hearings were held before the commission voted to allow the marriages and one of the commissioners, Lonnie Roberts, was not informed of the move until after the other commissioners began issuing licenses. Roberts criticized the "clandestine way" that the decision was made and speculated that he had not been included in the discussion because the other commissioners knew that he wouldn't support their decision.[3][4] Supporters also wanted to prevent the state courts from coming to the same conclusion as the county commissions--that the state constitution and law required the government to license same-sex marriage--before several standing civil rights lawsuits on the issue could be resolved.

Basic Rights Oregon led the campaign against Measure 36. Opponents of the measure made several arguments. Many were supporters of same-sex marriage. In addition, some argued that regardless of voters' feelings on same-sex marriage, the state constitution was an inappropriate place to dictate marriage policy, which should have been statutory. Opponents also argued that the measure added discriminatory language to the state constitution, which, they predicted, would later be seen in the same negative light as earlier constitutional language against African Americans. They also feared that the measure could be used as a legal basis for denying benefits to same-sex couples which are automatically granted to heterosexual married couples.

Satirical arguments

M. Dennis Moore, a Portland church organist, wrote satirical arguments on several Oregon ballot measures, including Measure 36. Moore's arguments, ostensibly in favor of the measure, were printed in the official voters' pamphlet. For example, reacting to some supporters' claims that the purpose of marriage is for procreation, he argues that "couples who fail to conceive within two years ought to have their marriage licenses revoked." Measure 36 supporters criticized the placement of Moore's arguments in the "Arguments in Favor" section of the pamphlet, but the Oregon Secretary of State's Office countered they had no choice under the law but to print his arguments as specified.[5]

See also


  1. ^ a b "November 2, 2004, General Election Abstract of Votes: STATE MEASURE NO. 36". Oregon Secretary of State. http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov22004/abstract/m36.pdf. Retrieved 2008-11-17. 
  2. ^ "Article I - Bill of Rights". Oregon Constitution.
  3. ^ Stine, Mara (March 3, 2004). "County supports gay marriage". The Gresham Outlook Online. http://web.archive.org/web/20040618214250/http://www.theoutlookonline.com/article/2410. 
  4. ^ "Statements of Multnomah County commissioners about gay marriage". The Oregonian. March 5, 2004. http://www.oregonlive.com/special/gaymarriage/index.ssf?/special/oregonian/gaymarriage/040305_statements.html. Retrieved 2007-03-17. 
  5. ^ Jacob Quinn Sanders (October 22, 2004). "Voters’ guide amuses, annoys". The Portland Tribune. http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id=26678. Retrieved 2007-03-17. 

External links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004) — Oregon Ballot Measure 37 is a controversial land use ballot initiative that passed in the U.S. state of Oregon in 2004 and is now codified as Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 195.305. Measure 37 has figured prominently in debates about the rights of …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 30 (2004) — Ballot Measure 30 of 2004 would have created a surcharge on Oregon s income tax, raised the minimum tax corporations pay in Oregon income taxes, and made other changes to the tax code to increase revenues. Similar to the previous year s defeated… …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 38 (2004) — Ballot Measure 38 of 2004 would have abolished Oregon s State Accident Insurance Fund (commonly known as SAIF Corporation), a nonprofit state chartered workers compensation provider. SAIF s assets would have been sold and the revenues from the… …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 31 (2004) — Ballot Measure 31 of 2004 was an amendment to the Oregon Constitution, referred to a popular vote by the Oregon Legislative Assembly, that permitted the Legislative Assembly to postpone certain elections in the event of the death of a candidate.… …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 39 (2006) — Oregon Ballot Measure 39, passed in the 2006 General Election, is a ballot measure that prohibits the government from condemning property from one private party (by eminent domain) on behalf of another private party. Advocates both for and… …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measures 37 (2004) and 49 (2007) — Oregon Ballot Measure 37 is a controversial land use ballot initiative that passed in the U.S. state of Oregon in 2004 and is now codified as Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 195.305. Measure 37 has figured prominently in debates about the rights of …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 11 (1994) — Measure 11 was a citizens initiative passed in 1994 in the U.S. State of Oregon. This statutory enactment established mandatory minimum sentencing for several crimes. The measure was approved in the November 8, 1994 general election with 788,695… …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 41 (2006) — Measure 41 Allows income tax deduction equal to Federal exemptions deduction to substitute for state exemption credit. Election results Yes or no …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 58 (2008) — Measure 58 Prohibits teaching public school student in language other than English for more than two years. Election results Yes or no Votes …   Wikipedia

  • Oregon Ballot Measure 59 (2008) — Measure 59 Creates an unlimited deduction for federal income taxes on individual taxpayers Oregon income tax returns. Election results Yes or no …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.